ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 March 2012, 12:18 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3
|
My second Rolex, buy this one?
Hi,
I am happy Rolex owner (Explorer I, 2011) and I am now looking to expand my collection, well double. This would be my first vintage purchase and I seek advice whether it is a good deal or not. The watch (Oysterdate) is said to be from 1961 with one owner in total. The original bracelet is not included and the seller claims that the black dial is rare for this model. The price would be roughly 2000 USD or 1450 EUR. Does it sound like an OK deal given that the watch is fully functional? My idea is to wear it with a nato strap. TIA, frekje |
9 March 2012, 12:54 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
|
Some experts will be here shortly, they are probably busy trashy the new Sky Dweller as I type this
For me, it seems like a lot of money for that watch |
9 March 2012, 01:00 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3
|
azguy,
Haha yeah probably.. This year's Basel news were maybe not that fantastic.. Thanks for your opinion, appreciate it. Sweden has a strong currency against the USD, reference is a that a can of coke is about $1.5. |
9 March 2012, 01:56 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: steve
Location: dallas area
Watch: 50's TT t-bird
Posts: 3,689
|
I'm no expert, but if this is a 34mm Rolex, I would expect to pay about $1,200 in the US. If it's 36mm, a bit more, but $2,000 seems high. If this watch has not been serviced in the recent past, you could be looking at a $500 service in the near future. Now, you're talking about a $2,500 watch.
|
9 March 2012, 02:10 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Belgium
Posts: 2,239
|
bought one last month (1958) iin great shape for +-1000€ so the price seems high to me
|
9 March 2012, 02:13 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
|
Too high.
|
9 March 2012, 02:16 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 262
|
Quote:
I am not an expert either, but I recently gave my oldest a similar watch what appears to be like condition and it was worth about $1200 USD. Unless the watch has some extrinsic value to you ( Dad had similar one, etc) I'd be tempted to negotiate a better price or pass. I'm sure that you could do better on the forum. Cheers, Tom |
|
9 March 2012, 02:19 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough ;-)
Posts: 21,232
|
At this price the original bracelet should be included.
Or at least a Rolex bracelet (even if it is not original. You can always swap |
9 March 2012, 02:27 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Eli Weisman
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: 1675/3, 79090
Posts: 442
|
Far too expensive unless it is in perfect condition and had a recent service. I have that model, but from 1967 on a Rivet bracelet. I expect you can find one on this forum or from Andy for about $1100 or so.
__________________
.................... GMT 1675/3 | 6694 | 16014 Tapestry Cream | 16014 Tapestry Gray | Tudor Black Bay Black ETA | Tudor Sub 79090 | Sinn 103 StSa | PAM 183 | IWC 3717-04 |
9 March 2012, 02:30 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3
|
Thanks guys, really good information and advice - appreciate it. I will see what the seller will offer as price and also if service is included in that. I will most likely keep looking for an alternative as a leisure piece.
Thanks a lot! /frekje |
9 March 2012, 04:15 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Watch: The Habs pick 1st!
Posts: 3,589
|
no bracelet = max value of US$1200
|
9 March 2012, 07:31 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Nick H.
Location: Amherst, NY
Watch: me flip
Posts: 1,901
|
I bought the same model here last year from a seller here for $850 shipped. Like many have said i wouldn'y pay more than $1200 shipped MAX.
|
9 March 2012, 07:33 AM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Nick H.
Location: Amherst, NY
Watch: me flip
Posts: 1,901
|
It's not a perpetual movement either correct? For 2k get yourself a nice DJ. If you need help finding some reputable buyers PM.
|
9 March 2012, 05:13 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Greg
Location: Europe
Watch: Rolex vintage
Posts: 1,062
|
Agree with the previous comments: a bit expensive without the original band.
I would invest a bit more and go for a nice vintage Datejust. |
9 March 2012, 05:52 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Malaysia
Watch: SM300+14060M
Posts: 2,012
|
nice looking..but i do agree the price is a lil high...
|
9 March 2012, 08:45 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Trav
Location: singapore
Watch: it
Posts: 2,316
|
$850 max without bracelet.
|
10 March 2012, 12:26 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: steve
Location: dallas area
Watch: 50's TT t-bird
Posts: 3,689
|
x2
I thought the exact same thing when I looked at the watch. Unless this specific model/year has special meaning, you'll have a much larger selection of DJ's with similar features and bracelet for $2,000.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.