ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 March 2012, 12:29 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Ivan
Location: San Diego
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 757
|
Relume or not?
I was wondering if this dial has been relumed? Can anyone shed some light on the dial, thanks
|
17 March 2012, 12:32 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Jeremy
Location: Louisiana
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,732
|
Lume @ 3 "o'clock looks a bit sloppy.
But, I really can't say. It's strange, I see some dials where I "Know" its a re-lume but then someone says "all original". In short, I'll let someone else confirm or deny. Do you have any other info on the watch... production year (Serial) etc. or better pictures ?
__________________
As a man is, so he sees. As the eye is formed, such are its powers. William Blake |
17 March 2012, 12:39 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Ivan
Location: San Diego
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 757
|
It's a 1967, I think 226xxxx, 5513 model sorry only picture
|
17 March 2012, 12:43 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: steve
Location: dallas area
Watch: 50's TT t-bird
Posts: 3,689
|
non-expert opinion
It has that "colored in the lines" look of a relume.
|
17 March 2012, 12:45 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Jeremy
Location: Louisiana
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,732
|
Ok. So, the dial has most likely been replaced. A 1967 should be a meters first. If your trying to buy this watch, definitely get some more pictures. Unless, this is offered at an absolute steal-lol
__________________
As a man is, so he sees. As the eye is formed, such are its powers. William Blake |
17 March 2012, 12:47 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Ivan
Location: San Diego
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 757
|
Thanks guys you guys really help me out alot
|
17 March 2012, 12:49 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Belgium
Posts: 2,239
|
you think its a 226xxxx ?? based on what are you thinking a serial number ?
|
17 March 2012, 12:52 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Ivan
Location: San Diego
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 757
|
It is a 226xxxx, on the fact they told me
|
17 March 2012, 01:03 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Belgium
Posts: 2,239
|
serial 226xxx is a little high for a '67
'69, '70 and feet first no problem to my opinion... |
17 March 2012, 02:55 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Ivan
Location: San Diego
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 757
|
In regards to the meter first thing, I have researched online and there are some feet first, can anyone elaborate
|
17 March 2012, 03:03 AM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Jeremy
Location: Louisiana
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,732
|
Quote:
As someone else pointed out the watch most likely dates to around 1969-70. Meters first dials, as in the text 200m = 660ft were changed around 1970 to 660ft=200m. Also watches sent in to Rolex for servicing were often changed later on to the "Updated Dial". This is not an issue for a 2.2 million 5513 as it could most likely have either. The year engraving in the caseback could help get a better idea as to the exact year of production.
__________________
As a man is, so he sees. As the eye is formed, such are its powers. William Blake |
|
17 March 2012, 03:08 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Ivan
Location: San Diego
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 757
|
Actually it is a 1968 , they ranged from 185xxxx to 230xxxx
|
17 March 2012, 03:10 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Ivan
Location: San Diego
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 757
|
Case back has 5513 and IV 68
|
17 March 2012, 03:12 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Ivan
Location: San Diego
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 757
|
They are offering it to me for 4000 head only, case is in excellent shape thick lugs
|
17 March 2012, 03:16 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Jeremy
Location: Louisiana
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,732
|
How do you figure the case is in excellent shape?
Are you just going by their description... P.S 4K is by no means a steal, quite average. Most importantly HAS THE WATCH BEEN SERVICED w/ proof like papers etc.
__________________
As a man is, so he sees. As the eye is formed, such are its powers. William Blake |
17 March 2012, 03:18 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Ivan
Location: San Diego
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 757
|
I saw the case, watch was checked, looks good, but no information on past service or papers
|
17 March 2012, 03:23 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Jeremy
Location: Louisiana
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,732
|
Well, if you like the watch buy it. Servicing will cost 550.00 ish and a 93150 will run a bit more than that. A cool NATO can be bought for relatively inexpensive.
-Cheers.
__________________
As a man is, so he sees. As the eye is formed, such are its powers. William Blake |
17 March 2012, 04:42 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Belgium
Posts: 2,239
|
A bit pricy ....
|
17 March 2012, 05:47 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 86
|
i dont think it's relumed.
|
17 March 2012, 05:58 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Jeremy
Location: Louisiana
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,732
|
If the caseback says IV 68 , probably should have meters first...
__________________
As a man is, so he sees. As the eye is formed, such are its powers. William Blake |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.