The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17 March 2012, 12:29 AM   #1
Mocazen
"TRF" Member
 
Mocazen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Ivan
Location: San Diego
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 757
Relume or not?

I was wondering if this dial has been relumed? Can anyone shed some light on the dial, thanks
Attached Images
 
Mocazen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2012, 12:32 AM   #2
Keeperoftime
"TRF" Member
 
Keeperoftime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Jeremy
Location: Louisiana
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,732
Lume @ 3 "o'clock looks a bit sloppy.

But, I really can't say.
It's strange, I see some dials where I "Know" its a re-lume but then someone says "all original".
In short, I'll let someone else confirm or deny.

Do you have any other info on the watch... production year (Serial) etc. or better pictures ?
__________________
As a man is, so he sees. As the eye is formed, such are its powers.
William Blake
Keeperoftime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2012, 12:39 AM   #3
Mocazen
"TRF" Member
 
Mocazen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Ivan
Location: San Diego
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 757
It's a 1967, I think 226xxxx, 5513 model sorry only picture
Mocazen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2012, 12:43 AM   #4
slcbbrown
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: steve
Location: dallas area
Watch: 50's TT t-bird
Posts: 3,689
non-expert opinion

It has that "colored in the lines" look of a relume.
slcbbrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2012, 12:45 AM   #5
Keeperoftime
"TRF" Member
 
Keeperoftime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Jeremy
Location: Louisiana
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,732
Ok. So, the dial has most likely been replaced. A 1967 should be a meters first. If your trying to buy this watch, definitely get some more pictures. Unless, this is offered at an absolute steal-lol
__________________
As a man is, so he sees. As the eye is formed, such are its powers.
William Blake
Keeperoftime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2012, 12:47 AM   #6
Mocazen
"TRF" Member
 
Mocazen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Ivan
Location: San Diego
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 757
Thanks guys you guys really help me out alot
Mocazen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2012, 12:49 AM   #7
Robbyvm
"TRF" Member
 
Robbyvm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Belgium
Posts: 2,239
you think its a 226xxxx ?? based on what are you thinking a serial number ?
Robbyvm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2012, 12:52 AM   #8
Mocazen
"TRF" Member
 
Mocazen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Ivan
Location: San Diego
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 757
It is a 226xxxx, on the fact they told me
Mocazen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2012, 01:03 AM   #9
Robbyvm
"TRF" Member
 
Robbyvm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Belgium
Posts: 2,239
serial 226xxx is a little high for a '67
'69, '70 and feet first no problem to my opinion...
Robbyvm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2012, 02:55 AM   #10
Mocazen
"TRF" Member
 
Mocazen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Ivan
Location: San Diego
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 757
In regards to the meter first thing, I have researched online and there are some feet first, can anyone elaborate
Mocazen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2012, 03:03 AM   #11
Keeperoftime
"TRF" Member
 
Keeperoftime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Jeremy
Location: Louisiana
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,732
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mocazen View Post
In regards to the meter first thing, I have researched online and there are some feet first, can anyone elaborate
Don't worry about it.

As someone else pointed out the watch most likely dates to around 1969-70.

Meters first dials, as in the text 200m = 660ft were changed around 1970 to 660ft=200m. Also watches sent in to Rolex for servicing were often changed later on to the "Updated Dial".

This is not an issue for a 2.2 million 5513 as it could most likely have either. The year engraving in the caseback could help get a better idea as to the exact year of production.
__________________
As a man is, so he sees. As the eye is formed, such are its powers.
William Blake
Keeperoftime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2012, 03:08 AM   #12
Mocazen
"TRF" Member
 
Mocazen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Ivan
Location: San Diego
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 757
Actually it is a 1968 , they ranged from 185xxxx to 230xxxx
Mocazen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2012, 03:10 AM   #13
Mocazen
"TRF" Member
 
Mocazen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Ivan
Location: San Diego
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 757
Case back has 5513 and IV 68
Mocazen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2012, 03:12 AM   #14
Mocazen
"TRF" Member
 
Mocazen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Ivan
Location: San Diego
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 757
They are offering it to me for 4000 head only, case is in excellent shape thick lugs
Mocazen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2012, 03:16 AM   #15
Keeperoftime
"TRF" Member
 
Keeperoftime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Jeremy
Location: Louisiana
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,732
How do you figure the case is in excellent shape?

Are you just going by their description...

P.S 4K is by no means a steal, quite average. Most importantly HAS THE WATCH BEEN SERVICED w/ proof like papers etc.
__________________
As a man is, so he sees. As the eye is formed, such are its powers.
William Blake
Keeperoftime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2012, 03:18 AM   #16
Mocazen
"TRF" Member
 
Mocazen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Ivan
Location: San Diego
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 757
I saw the case, watch was checked, looks good, but no information on past service or papers
Mocazen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2012, 03:23 AM   #17
Keeperoftime
"TRF" Member
 
Keeperoftime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Jeremy
Location: Louisiana
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,732
Well, if you like the watch buy it. Servicing will cost 550.00 ish and a 93150 will run a bit more than that. A cool NATO can be bought for relatively inexpensive.

-Cheers.
__________________
As a man is, so he sees. As the eye is formed, such are its powers.
William Blake
Keeperoftime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2012, 04:42 AM   #18
Robbyvm
"TRF" Member
 
Robbyvm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Belgium
Posts: 2,239
A bit pricy ....
Robbyvm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2012, 05:47 AM   #19
lupus
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 86
i dont think it's relumed.
lupus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2012, 05:58 AM   #20
Keeperoftime
"TRF" Member
 
Keeperoftime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Jeremy
Location: Louisiana
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,732
If the caseback says IV 68 , probably should have meters first...
__________________
As a man is, so he sees. As the eye is formed, such are its powers.
William Blake
Keeperoftime is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.