ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
28 June 2012, 01:41 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 23
|
1992 Daytona - Your Thoughts Please
Hello, I came across this watch for a price that seems to good to be true, but the finish of the bracelet makes me think it is real for some reason. There is only one picture, but I can't spot anything wrong with it. What do you think?
|
28 June 2012, 01:50 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Brian
Location: NYC and San Fran
Watch: 5960p+6262
Posts: 1,000
|
Fake
|
28 June 2012, 02:04 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 23
|
Thanks Brian, could you elaborate? I'd like to know how to spot a fake for future reference.
|
28 June 2012, 02:23 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Brian
Location: NYC and San Fran
Watch: 5960p+6262
Posts: 1,000
|
I'd rather not get into it so as not to provide easy pointers for counterfeiters, but your best bet is to look at a genuine white dialed 1992 Daytona (it'll be a model with a Zenith movement), and compare it. I'm not an expert but this one is really obvious.
I would also guess this one has "1992 Daytona Winner" engraved on the back of the case and was found in someone's grandpa's desk drawer. |
28 June 2012, 02:37 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 23
|
seconds subdial in wrong position and subdials should be black? Also, when did Rolex start polishing the center links?
|
28 June 2012, 02:39 AM | #6 |
Liar & Ratbag
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Renato
Location: NYC / Miami Beach
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 5,344
|
100% fake. A 1992 Daytona is a 16520 yet the pic is a horrible attempt to look like a 116520.
|
28 June 2012, 02:45 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Brian
Location: NYC and San Fran
Watch: 5960p+6262
Posts: 1,000
|
Center links were polished beginning with the 16520.
|
28 June 2012, 02:47 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 23
|
thanks guys
|
28 June 2012, 02:52 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Brian
Location: NYC and San Fran
Watch: 5960p+6262
Posts: 1,000
|
Yeah skip this one. |
28 June 2012, 07:09 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
|
Fake for sure stay away
__________________
watches many |
28 June 2012, 07:36 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Mr. Bill
Location: South Florida
Watch: 16610
Posts: 6,148
|
Run Forrest Run!
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of the Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons - ID # 13 |
28 June 2012, 07:47 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
|
To be honest, all it took was 0.5 sec to see the wrong dial, case, bezel, crown, pushers, bracelet.
Even if the crappy pic wasn't there the "too good to be true" price would be enough for me. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.