ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
2 November 2007, 10:11 PM | #1 |
Facilitator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 33,588
|
New 'M' serial Air-King..proportions
Is it just me or does the hour and especially the minute hand seem to be disproportionately small (short and narrow) on this new "M" serial Air-King?
The new Air-King does seem to have quite a few improvements/changes: SEL, new style bracelet & clasp, COSC, broad lugs.....but the minute hand |
2 November 2007, 10:17 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Queensland, AUST
Posts: 2,003
|
Nice, but.....the hands could be a little thicker?
|
2 November 2007, 10:25 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
I agree, Steve!
Those hands suck!
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
2 November 2007, 10:28 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Queensland, AUST
Posts: 2,003
|
Is the lume on the indices really pink or are you messing around with photoshop Steve?
|
2 November 2007, 10:35 PM | #5 |
Facilitator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 33,588
|
I took the photo from a Japanese web-site, I thought this was just the normal silver dial with white markers. I don't notice the markers were pink, but now you mention it.....yeah, must be a ladies model Air-King
|
2 November 2007, 11:37 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: san francisco
Watch: gmt2c pam372
Posts: 842
|
i've got an m series AK in my hands at the moment and the indices appear white (though the dial on this watch is "rose"). the hands are a little small but are very readable and i think they are the right proportion for the watch (which is also small). i bought this watch for my mom, but i tried it on the other day and i thought it looked good on (and i'm used to wearing a gmt iic), but this watch is not a sports watch. it is, by design, refined and elegant. in the flesh, the minute hand does not look as small as the picture above (probably because of the way it catches the light). in the picture above, i believe that the hour hand is in the light, and the minute hand is in the shadow (based upon the shading on the dial) and that is contributing to the minute hand looking smaller than it really appears in person.
|
2 November 2007, 11:58 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Florida
Watch: PAM 1090
Posts: 3,723
|
The hours hand looks ok, but the minutes hand looks pathetic.
__________________
Member #471 |
3 November 2007, 02:38 AM | #8 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
Yes, it does seem they could beef those hands up a bit.
Here is the blue version.. Doesnt look too bad at 10X normal size.. |
3 November 2007, 03:02 AM | #9 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
Have to agree with you, Steve.....that long hand does look way too skinny!!
Here's a more proportionate and much better version!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
3 November 2007, 03:15 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: san francisco
Watch: gmt2c pam372
Posts: 842
|
|
3 November 2007, 03:16 AM | #11 | |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
Quote:
JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
|
3 November 2007, 03:37 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: san francisco
Watch: gmt2c pam372
Posts: 842
|
|
3 November 2007, 05:09 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Robert
Location: Angelus Oaks, CA
Watch: 116713
Posts: 6,828
|
What Rolex has the thickest hands? I wan to SEE it!
|
3 November 2007, 10:14 AM | #14 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New York
Watch: Pepsi,LV,SSDJ
Posts: 343
|
Those hands look like they belong to Kate Moss.
|
3 November 2007, 03:40 PM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: John
Location: Australia
Watch: Me
Posts: 1,950
|
Quote:
You are right, it does look a little strange. Just looked at a couple of my OP Dates, one dating from 1969ish and another from the mid 1980's, and both have minute hands slightly thinner than the hour hand. Anthough, they don't look as notable as the AK above. Here is my K Series AK. A little thinner. John. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.