ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
15 February 2011, 08:37 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: The Major
Location: Surrey, UK
Watch: All Are Beautiful
Posts: 356
|
Deepsea Divers Clasp Removal Guide
Removing The Divers Link From A Glidelock Bracelet
If like many Deepsea owners you are truthful then you will admit that you will probably never wear it over a wetsuit which means the divers link clasp is redundant. Now that said what harm is it doing there? Well for a 7" wrist with 2 links removed the glidelock mechanism on maximum tightness is just a couple of mm too short. The solution is to remove the divers link and replace it with a single spare link. Adding the single spare link over the clasp just gives that perfect fit to some wrist size configurations and allows the glidelock to sit central for average wear and be tightened when cold and lengthened when warm. Removing the divers clasp regardless just makes the watch feel better on the wrist and when extended it is a full bracelet of links rather than several links and a divers clasp. Anyway heres the guide. Tools required: Screwdriver, Pliers, ThreadLock The glidelock complete as issued When opened the divers clasp needs to be fully extended to reveal the screw Loosen both screws as shown, if you dont have a steady hand or confidence then I suggest you tape over them before you start and put the screwdriver through them With the screws removed drop the divers link and place back in the box with the papers etc As you can see the divers clasp is near identical to 2 links Then replace the divers clasp with a single link, ensuring a tiny spot of thread lock to the screws. All fitted and adjusted it glides seemlessly and makes the bracelet feel better, look better, and if you know youll never dive then it will never be required. That said it takes all of 5 minutes to refit it |
15 February 2011, 08:55 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Rescueguy
Location: Here
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 1,129
|
Simply Outstanding, time to purchase 2 spare links and eliminate the divers extention totally.
The pics were a great help in comparing the divers link to the 2 extra links. |
28 February 2011, 05:45 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Jimmy
Location: Lancs - England
Watch: Rolex Submariner C
Posts: 86
|
Are people liking this? Does it make much of a difference and how much will it be for two links?
|
28 February 2011, 05:49 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
|
Nice pics. Thanks for sharing.
|
28 February 2011, 05:59 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Richard
Location: England
Watch: 16610 & 16710
Posts: 899
|
Great info thanks
__________________
SS Submariner Date "V" SS GMT Master II Pepsi "D" |
5 March 2011, 04:25 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Jimmy
Location: Lancs - England
Watch: Rolex Submariner C
Posts: 86
|
Are people liking this? Does it make much of a difference and how much will it be for two links?
|
5 March 2011, 04:39 AM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,217
|
I don't own a DSSD but have heard from more than one owner who has done this and agrees, removing the divers extension makes for a better fit.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club |
5 March 2011, 04:43 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: John
Location: Australia
Watch: Depends on mood.
Posts: 9,536
|
Awesome info, thanks everyone!
|
5 March 2011, 04:43 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,131
|
+1
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB |
1 April 2012, 04:25 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: The Major
Location: Surrey, UK
Watch: All Are Beautiful
Posts: 356
|
Ive have met a few people who have removed the extention link now and all agree its the way forward
|
1 April 2012, 04:29 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: US
Watch: Sub
Posts: 3,175
|
How about you remove those stickers too!
__________________
侘 寂 -- wabi-sabi -- acceptance of transience and imperfection by finding beauty in that which is imperfect, impermanent, and incomplete Commissioner of WEIRD POLICE , Badge # ecsub44 |
1 April 2012, 11:01 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,131
|
I can confirm...I removed the extension on Friday and it fits like a glove.
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB |
1 April 2012, 11:15 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Fernwood
Posts: 3,455
|
I don't get it. Does it 'fit better'? Or does it 'operate flawlessly' with the replaced links?
__________________
116613LN 16600SD 16610LV 116710 16710 16570 Speedy 3570.50 PAM25 Oris TT1 and a bunch of G-Shocks. Flipped: Daytona 116520 Seamaster 2231.80 |
23 April 2012, 05:11 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: The Major
Location: Surrey, UK
Watch: All Are Beautiful
Posts: 356
|
It fits alot better yes
|
25 July 2012, 05:55 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2006
Real Name: Mike
Location: Tustin
Watch: LV Sub
Posts: 1,940
|
I dont know why but for me i personally like it with the divers extention. I guess its personal preference.
__________________
116610 LN 116713 LN Instagram: rolexfan69 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.