ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
25 October 2012, 07:05 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 6
|
Have I missed anything ? Deep Sea vs IWC Ingenieur.....
OK - I've done a fair bit of reading and trying on.......but have I missed anything ?!
I'm looking for a 40th Birthday 'forever' watch that is being bought for me as a present I'm quite a big guy and although a Sub was obvious initial choice it just looks and feels too small for me. I currently rotate a Tudor HC, Union Glashutte Pilot, and Breitling Avenger Seawolf (titanium and grey faced so although big nicely understated). I am looking for something rugged but also classy & flexible - needs to look the part in the office as well as a long way away from it ! Functionality isn't a real factor - tough, reasonably waterproof and perhaps a date ! A rotating bezel might be nice but not a major consideration. I was then hoping that the 42mm Explorer would do the trick and although beautiful the bezel didn't sing and not quite chunky enough ! I have given the Black Bay and Pelagos a try - out of the two, the Pelagos had the edge but not quite fitting the forever and classy briefs. Planet Oceans look and feel great but again not quite forever and quite a few of them around (I'd probably prefer the pre-ceramic model which feels a bit more timeless). She who holds the purse strings isn't a PAM fan and AP out of my league ! So at the moment I am left with a Deep Sea vs IWC Ingenieur Mission Earth. Both feel great and although I really did want to prefer the Deep Sea, the height and 'flashyness' caused a bit of doubt. The IWC obviously misses out on the bezel but is more than waterproof enough and comes with a cost advantage (albeit with faster depreciation but I will have no plan to sell)....but it's not a Rolex.... So - in the absence of a 42mm Sub / classic Seadweller has anybody out there come across any other contenders ? Has anybody out there lived with the IWC or ever done a similar comparison ? Ahhhh but not a bad problem to have in the big scheme of things |
25 October 2012, 07:47 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Katy, TX
Watch: GMT II-c TT
Posts: 773
|
Deepsea all the way. I am also a big person and the fit on my wrist is just right. I have gotten many copliment on this watch.
|
25 October 2012, 07:49 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Blancpain Fifty Fathoms
45 mm and wears beautifully. Should tick most/all of the boxes, and looks sensational whether diving in the ocean or out for dinner Great pedigree, classy, and you don't see many in the wild
__________________
|
25 October 2012, 07:50 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
|
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man. |
25 October 2012, 07:56 PM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,017
|
I'd give the Ball Engineer Master II - Aviator Dual Time.
Larger case like you want Lower cost like the wifey wants I love mine. It gets 75% of available wrist-time and I have a Root Beet, YM, DJ, Omega SMP Chrono and Omega Auto. The permanent lume from gas tube technology is stunning...
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
25 October 2012, 08:13 PM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Seth
Location: nj
Watch: Omega
Posts: 24,834
|
Prefer the iwc. But as stated the BP is a total winner as well.
__________________
If happiness is a state of mind, why look anywhere else for it? IG: gsmotorclub IG: thesawcollection (Both mostly just car stuff) |
25 October 2012, 08:14 PM | #7 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,493
|
I'm guessing most will say Deepsea.
The DS is an awesome watch and I love it as much as the next guy but I will say that the Mission Earth is right up there. I find it more comfortable and just fun to wear. Looks great dressed up or down even with a rubber strap but you can always add the bracelet if you want. Good luck. Both are great options. |
25 October 2012, 08:46 PM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wearing DJ or OP
Posts: 133
|
The IWC looks great, that's my vote.
|
25 October 2012, 08:51 PM | #9 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Gotham
Posts: 1,274
|
Quote:
Totally concur. The FF would be a fantastic option. |
|
25 October 2012, 09:38 PM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: CT
Posts: 134
|
IWC products are excellent. I had a IWC aqua timer TI that I bought in 1999 I loved the watch. The problem is that if you nicked the ti case you can't fix that. But IWC finishing it better than the Rolex.
|
25 October 2012, 10:16 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Brendan
Location: NJ
Watch: Pepsi/LVC/DJII
Posts: 446
|
Ap roo?
|
25 October 2012, 10:24 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Kenny
Location: northern ireland
Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs
Posts: 5,136
|
Take another look at the Explorer 42mm - Awesome watch that has the tool watch look, with modern updates! Was conidering a Deepsea myself (and still might in the future) but like you, felt that size and possibly some 'flash' was putting me off, so I picked up an Explorer 42mm with black face .
You could not really go wrong with it! |
25 October 2012, 11:18 PM | #13 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
Save for the AP.
|
25 October 2012, 11:29 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 107
|
I own a DSSD and a 3227-01 Ingy. The 3227 is big and heavy enough so imagine this Mission Earth must be massive. The IWC quality is absolutely superb and the dial is stunning. Tough call.
|
26 October 2012, 01:14 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 6
|
Thanks so far - it's not going to be easy this !
|
26 October 2012, 01:26 AM | #16 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,300
|
FF or PAM 305.
|
26 October 2012, 03:52 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 789
|
I love IWC but the Mission Earth is just a bit too, well, "Breitling" for my taste.
|
26 October 2012, 03:57 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 482
|
Rolex Deepsea all night long.
|
26 October 2012, 04:16 AM | #19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: yes.. it's Kyu
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Rolex 116759SANR
Posts: 1,499
|
Quote:
But Holy shat I love that Ball I'm going to definitely look into it , How sturdy are they and how well built are they ? I'm not aware of this brand, |
|
26 October 2012, 04:20 AM | #20 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
|
Only you can make that call. I do agree to add the Blancpain Fifty Fathom into the mix to make it even more challenging for you.
If you have no issues with the size, hard to beat a DSSD in sheer quality though and classic good looks. Keep in mind, you have to live with it for decades and decades. |
26 October 2012, 06:25 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bay Area, Ca
Watch: 116400GV
Posts: 834
|
If you're entertaining the giant DSSD, how about an Aquatimer instead?
The standard black-and-yellow one is most similar to your two choices, though a white-and-orange boutique edition would be nice. |
26 October 2012, 07:07 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 6
|
Thanks...not sure that the Aquatimer hits the 'smart' brief ? The Fifty Fathoms is definately now on the list although would need to be a used buy I expect - need to track one down to try on
|
26 October 2012, 07:21 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,740
|
I much prefer the IWC Mission Earth to the DSSD. With that said, the new Explorer II's beat them all, it is flat out the best modern day Rolex on the market.
__________________
My grails: |
26 October 2012, 10:23 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Melbourne
Watch: 16610, Tudor 1960
Posts: 1,554
|
Hublot Big Bang?
|
26 October 2012, 10:32 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Melbourne
Watch: 16610, Tudor 1960
Posts: 1,554
|
Take another look at the Omega PO 45.5mm 8500.
Ceramic Bezel, beautiful and dead-accurate double-barrelled 8500 Co-Axial movement, can switch from its S/S bracelet to factory rubber strap (which can be purchased separately), IMO is also classy (and less flashy than a DSSD as you feared) with a suit, and it's a lot less thick than the DSSD which was also your concern. Not to mention at a cost advantage too. IMHO I think this is a great 'forever' piece! What's not to love about it? Or you could go for the Chrono 9300 version, but this is unfortunately thicker than than the DSSD (PO 19.1mm high vs DSSD 17.8mm). |
26 October 2012, 10:53 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NH
Watch: SD4K
Posts: 492
|
X2, I'm 6'4" 220 lbs the FF is the perfect size for me plus it flys under the radar when you want it too but gets loads of attention from those in the know. Throw in the rarity, history, 5 day power reserve and antimagnetic cage and I personally wouldn't choose anything else in that price range. That being said, given the choice again I would probably go for the Aqualung Tribute.
|
26 October 2012, 11:01 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: George
Location: Seattle
Watch: One of Them
Posts: 6,924
|
DSSD is just too fat for a "only one for life" watch. IWC Ingenieur Mission Earth is just a comfortable and great watch... timeless yet modern.
__________________
|
26 October 2012, 11:47 AM | #28 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Canada
Watch: 16570
Posts: 457
|
Had the DSSD and loved it for the six months I owned it. Truly comfy for the size and weight - kudo's to ROLEX for that portion of the engineering. Downside IMHO is the crowded dial/rehaut and small date window. The Omega and Ball are both MF's which I would consider if I was looking for a 40mm+ sized watch.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.