The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25 October 2012, 02:00 AM   #61
Marrk
"TRF" Member
 
Marrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Mark
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: 5513
Posts: 2,192
Quote:
Originally Posted by Submarino View Post
The original Royal Oak from 1972 and referred to as 'Jumbo' is the reference 5402. Check my thread with all the reference numbers on all Royal Oaks ever made. There you'll find the ref. numbers for all the 39mm pieces. The 15202 is also a 39mm watch.

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=219911


Thanks.


So, what's the thickness of the cases on these watches? I am seeing diameter sizes but not thickness (although I admit I've only had time to skim the article).
Marrk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 October 2012, 02:11 AM   #62
Submarino
"TRF" Member
 
Submarino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Mr. H
Location: Dallas
Watch: them for me!
Posts: 7,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marrk View Post
Thanks.


So, what's the thickness of the cases on these watches? I am seeing diameter sizes but not thickness (although I admit I've only had time to skim the article).
The thickness of the 5402 is 0.8cm (8mm) and the 15202 is one millimeter thicker because it's fitted with a sapphire case back opposed to a solid back on the 5402. The thickness was measured on my 5402 from the bottom of the case back to the top of the crystal.
__________________
WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER

Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle

Submarino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 October 2012, 02:14 AM   #63
Marrk
"TRF" Member
 
Marrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Mark
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: 5513
Posts: 2,192
Quote:
Originally Posted by Submarino View Post
The thickness of the 5402 is 0.8cm (8mm) and the 15202 is one millimeter thicker because it's fitted with a sapphire case back opposed to a solid back on the 5402. The thickness was measured on my 5402 from the bottom of the case back to the top of the crystal.

8mm! Really? If so, I gotta see this watch.
Marrk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 October 2012, 02:18 AM   #64
Submarino
"TRF" Member
 
Submarino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Mr. H
Location: Dallas
Watch: them for me!
Posts: 7,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marrk View Post
8mm! Really? If so, I gotta see this watch.
Just measured mine and I didn't use a caliper slide gauge. If I had, it's possible that it might be even thinner than what I told you.

Just as a reference, the 15300 is only 9.4mm thick and is considerably thicker than the 5402 or the 15202.
__________________
WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER

Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle

Submarino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 October 2012, 05:39 AM   #65
Bulliondesk
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Howard100/101
Posts: 656
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willygallardo View Post
here's mine such a beauty the new dials..
Might be for sale, if anyone is interested gonna start shopping for a new RGRC
For sale you don't say? Hmm..
Bulliondesk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 October 2012, 09:22 AM   #66
Willygallardo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Willy
Location: Montreal
Watch: AP's - Rolex
Posts: 972
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulliondesk View Post
For sale you don't say? Hmm..
I want a Rgrc new dial ,if you have one we could trade +$$
Willygallardo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 November 2012, 04:48 AM   #67
ap_mike
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Michael
Location: Singapore
Watch: AP, PP, Rolex
Posts: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by psv View Post
My AD just got a Rubberclad in, latest version bien sure with black datewheel, updated numerals etc. My inclination has been to find the right time to pick up a 15202, but this, needless to say, makes for a better daily driver.



Oh well, choices...
Wow... lovely!
ap_mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.