14060m Bracelet VS 16610 Bracelet

[RolexDivers]

Hi folks,

Can someone list the strong points and weaknesses of one bracelet over another?

Thank you,

[artschool]

clasp is the big difference for me.

[R_Ongjoco]

Originally Posted by artschool

clasp is the big difference for me.

I believe they used the same bracelet until the 16610 added the SEL, no?

[RolexDivers]

Originally Posted by artschool

clasp is the big difference for me.

Really? How so?

By the way, does the 14060M comes with a diver's extension?

Thanks,

[wristybusiness]

Originally Posted by RolexDivers

By the way, does the 14060M comes with a diver's extension?

Thanks,

yes

[stockae92]

14060M bracelet never have SEL, the diver extension is more noisy, and its very comfortable :)

[Tools]

Originally Posted by R_Ongjoco

I believe they used the same bracelet until the 16610 added the SEL, no?

That is correct... Both used the 93150 until the introduction of the 93250 for the 16610 a short decade ago..

the clasps are the same, essentially.

The only real differences are the SEL and the improved Diver extension that locks into the clasp on the 93250. One can decide for theirself if that is a strength or weakness..

[RolexDivers]

Thank you for the info!

[artschool]

Originally Posted by RolexDivers

Really? How so?

By the way, does the 14060M comes with a diver's extension?

Thanks,

my mistake read the numbers wrong.