ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
9 January 2013, 02:39 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Alan
Location: Bristol. UK
Posts: 621
|
Is the Submariner too small?
I read lots about guys saying 40mm watches being to small for them. Do you think this is the case and will Rolex eventually realise perhaps a 42-44mm Sub would be a better watch for most or would it compete with the DSSD to much for their long term stratergy ?
|
9 January 2013, 02:40 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
no - 40mm sub = perfect
|
9 January 2013, 12:27 PM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ri
Watch: Sun Dial
Posts: 14,346
|
|
9 January 2013, 02:41 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Mickey®
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: Swiss Made
Posts: 5,801
|
Nope. I don't think so.
But some others will think so. Others will also not care. |
9 January 2013, 02:42 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: US
Posts: 3,257
|
I wear a 44mm AP on weekends. 40mm Sub still feels fine on weekdays.
|
9 January 2013, 02:42 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 66
|
Yes!
|
9 January 2013, 02:43 AM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Dad
Location: USA
Watch: To many
Posts: 1,389
|
I personally think its wears and looks perfect. I recently sold my deep sea because I didn't wear it and thought it wore to thick on my wrist.
|
22 April 2013, 01:00 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: UK
Watch: them come and go
Posts: 689
|
X2
__________________
John Sub 126610LV incoming GMT 126710 BLRO YM 40 126622 Rhodium IWC Portugieser Automatic 40.4mm - Pink dial |
9 January 2013, 02:43 AM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,301
|
|
9 January 2013, 12:43 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: United States
Watch: Overseas
Posts: 992
|
|
9 January 2013, 02:45 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Duy
Location: New Orleans, LA
Watch: Speedmaster 3861
Posts: 1,925
|
I don't think the Submariner is too small. But I do have a 6.5 (.75 on a good day ) But imho, I really think a bigger Submariner will sell pretty well. Yes, I understand that the Submariner is already a great seller. But from my personal experiences with my peers and just talking to people. A lot of them really think most Rolex are relevantly small.
__________________
De gustibus non est disputandum. |
9 January 2013, 02:46 AM | #12 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Steve
Location: Chicago
Watch: Rolex and Omega
Posts: 564
|
Nope, I think 40mm is an ideal size for a sport watch.
__________________
Regards, Steve |
9 January 2013, 02:51 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 1,196
|
Let me think.........No!
|
9 January 2013, 02:51 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: DM[V]
Watch: 16710 | 16600
Posts: 3,546
|
Perfect size for me. 6.5 and up wrist (depending on the day) 6'2" and it's perfect.
__________________
Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
|
9 January 2013, 02:53 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Heath
Location: Lawrenceburg KY
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 3,982
|
I think it is the perfect size. I don't think they will ever change
__________________
“You may delay, but time will not.” ― Benjamin Franklin |
9 January 2013, 02:55 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Slovenia, EU
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 1,507
|
No way. 116610s are perfect.
|
9 January 2013, 02:58 AM | #17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
Subc wears like a 42mm, so with old sub at 40mm and DSSD at 44mm all wrists are catered for.
|
22 April 2013, 02:04 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Canada
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 1,594
|
|
9 January 2013, 02:59 AM | #19 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,268
|
Please no, 40mm is perfect. I could even live without the maxi case!
|
9 January 2013, 03:01 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Kyung
Location: Anywhere?
Watch: cha want...
Posts: 4,488
|
No!
__________________
Instagram: @whatthedeuce_ |
9 January 2013, 03:05 AM | #21 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: ATX
Posts: 2,886
|
40 is fine but41 with old lugs would be fine too
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2 |
9 January 2013, 03:19 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 11,137
|
No. Dislike the BIG 42+ trend...
__________________
Instagram: @watches_anonymous |
9 January 2013, 03:21 AM | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
|
40mm far too small. 60mm is minimum, 80-100mm much more in line, with one meter diameter cases to really become the norm.
|
9 January 2013, 03:28 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 11,137
|
Hahah...
__________________
Instagram: @watches_anonymous |
9 January 2013, 04:10 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Vince Choo
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Watch: 5513 '67 Sub
Posts: 160
|
|
9 January 2013, 05:15 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Syed
Location: The Ether
Posts: 3,388
|
There is no perfect size and it always bothers me when people proclaim that 40mm is perfect.
It's relative to wrist size. Yes, a 40mm watch looks great on a 6.5 inch wrist. Not so much on 7.5 or higher. My wrist is 7.5 and 40mm is a bit too small. I don't think it will happen, but I would love to see the majority of rolex watches go to 42mm. Of course that's just me and that reasoning is selfish but it's the same as people with smaller wrists saying that 40mm is perfect. |
22 April 2013, 05:14 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Patrick
Location: New York City
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 135
|
I have 3 watches, 2 in a 42mm and my Sub in 40mm.....I'm happy with the Sub, but wouldn't mind it in 42mm
|
11 May 2019, 06:47 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Dubai
Posts: 1,450
|
|
9 January 2013, 03:48 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,224
|
First off, I am a firm believer that 40mm is the perfect size of a watch. Secondly, I think the 40mm SubC sets itself apart from the DSSD in the same way that I believe the 40mm GMTIIC sets itself apart from the Explorer II.
Part of the Rolex sports lineup is that there is some redundancy (albeit good aesthetics) in the varying sports models. In my opinion what helps inform a consumers decision to by one model over the other are characteristics like dial options, precious metal options, size. Yes we all know the technical specs of the DSSD over the SubC but to the general public and the average consumer one is just a bigger Submariner. Why blur that line by amping up the case size. I think Rolex already succumbed to some of that pressure with the new cases in 2008-2009, I can't see it going bigger at 42mm. The interesting sport model to discuss a possible increase in size would be the Daytona simply because there isn't another sports model similar in the Rolex line up. I personally do not feel the Daytona should go bigger but atleast if it did it would not be competing with anything similar made by Rolex. |
9 January 2013, 03:55 AM | #30 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Mickey®
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: Swiss Made
Posts: 5,801
|
The new SubC is 40mm but looks more like 42mm to me...
We are only talking about the head right? So the Lugs and stuff can make a watch look bigger or smaller.... |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.