The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20 January 2013, 05:26 PM   #61
Duc5150
2024 Pledge Member
 
Duc5150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: TB
Location: West Coast
Posts: 339
Wasn't a fan when pics and info first came out

But in person and on the wrist, my opinion changed......it's a stunner and the complication is pretty cool too Definitely a hefty chunk of metal on your wrist....

Different strokes for different folks!




Todd B. in the OC
Duc5150 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2013, 05:53 PM   #62
TimeOnMyHands
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Canada
Watch: 16570
Posts: 457
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ravager135 View Post
....................... even if Patek is a technically superior brand.
Really...superior in complexity or reliability?
TimeOnMyHands is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2013, 05:56 PM   #63
Psmith
"TRF" Member
 
Psmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadBoy View Post
Maybe you're right, there a probably other watches too who are "better" , "nicest looking" or whatever.
It's just that this Rolex makes my dingy wiggle... ....
And that doesn't happen much...

I believe this is called 'oversharing'
__________________
Psmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2013, 07:26 PM   #64
Sarajevo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: The Netherlands
Watch: 16600371701
Posts: 1,271
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mort1 View Post



The gmt wheel looks ok on the rose gold...
terrible review - he is basically working out how the thing works during it. Nice watch though.
Sarajevo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2013, 07:47 PM   #65
bayerische
"TRF" Member
 
bayerische's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puffy View Post
you'd want a patek for that kind of money
Agreed. Or AP. Its too much dough for a Rolex IMHO.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
bayerische is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2013, 08:19 PM   #66
Bangel
"TRF" Member
 
Bangel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 15,802
Since its unveiling at Basel last year, the passage of time and the opportunity to see it first hand has not changed my original opinion of it.

It's a technically interesting piece, but I have a hard time reconciling having an annual calendar without a day function and find the aesthetics unappealing.

It does please me (and Rolex!) that people have the completely opposite opinion to mine though. Variety makes life interesting.
Bangel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2013, 10:28 PM   #67
NAVY
"TRF" Member
 
NAVY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Watch: 114060
Posts: 319
Saw it weeks ago and at first thought it was some sort of horrific fake Rolex spin off straight from the depths of a Bangkok market

Pretty much sums it up
NAVY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2013, 01:34 AM   #68
FremStar
"TRF" Member
 
FremStar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Sam
Location: Gotham City
Watch: Wall Street
Posts: 9,954
Quote:
Originally Posted by FeelingTheBlues View Post
I hope you didn't take the first part of my post seriously Sam, you know my habit of pulling your leg every once in a while, it's all in good (yet absurd) fun and has nothing to do with my opinion of the Sky-Dweller (which I, as I've written above, happen to like).
Carl, not at all, I am actually smiling and reading responses from the naysayers. As I have said its ok to have a competent opinion on any timepiece including the Sky-Dweller... Fun times!
__________________
"Wealth is of the heart and mind, not of the pocket!"

"A Watch Is An Emotional Object, And So, It Is The Responsibility Of The Brand To Create Emotion Through It's Products" - Georges Kern

"In the 1950s and 60s, they made the Ref 8171, which is a cult collectible—now that’s the ultimate Rolex you could own with a calendar and a moon phase.” - John Reardon

"Heh, heh, heh..." - Michael Kilyung
FremStar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2013, 03:17 AM   #69
patrike
"TRF" Member
 
patrike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Patrik
Location: WISland
Watch: The sun go down.
Posts: 895
I think the SD looks amazing! I really like that its a complicated watch, that's not as fragile as all others. I'd love to get the RG in the future. Only think I'd like to change would be the markers. Would like simple stick markers instead. That might help the watch look a bit more like a dress watch.
__________________
patrike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2013, 04:10 AM   #70
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
SkD is growing on me but I like the DD2 better. Just looking at Sam's SkD vs DD2 pics make me realize how striking the DD2 is in its simplicity.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2013, 04:19 AM   #71
bscepter
"TRF" Member
 
bscepter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Patrick
Location: Omaha
Watch: 16610 Submariner
Posts: 948
i think the SD looks great in WG, but i think it looks pretty horrendous in any other configuration. maybe one day they'll do an SS version. i think that would be pretty cool.
__________________

2009 16610 Submariner Date
1971 1601 Datejust
1966 Omega Seamaster
1965 Vulcain Voyager Chronograph
bscepter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2013, 10:59 AM   #72
Ravager135
"TRF" Member
 
Ravager135's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,224
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimeOnMyHands View Post
Really...superior in complexity or reliability?
In terms of general perception amongst the watch community. Maybe the better phrase would have been "more highly regarded."
Ravager135 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.