ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

jontay02 · 22 January 2013, 02:14 AM

Tried the Hulk the other day.
Then it got me thinking how the 15300ST will look like on my wrist.

Opinions anyone? No Ap Boutique / AD in my area at all.

kilyung · 22 January 2013, 02:24 AM

Two very different watches. Tough to tell... You really have to try it on.

Submarino · 22 January 2013, 03:31 AM

Fits very different than a SubC as it is way thinner and less chunky. It is a very comfortable watch for every day wear.

tifosi · 22 January 2013, 04:04 AM

The Sub fits you nicely. Looks similar to the way the Sub-C fits me. I say 15400 cause that is what I prefer.

JorgeB · 22 January 2013, 04:25 AM

I tried the 15300 the other day and I own a SubC, i felt the AP wore a little smaller than the submariner. It looked great.

jontay02 · 22 January 2013, 04:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kilyung

Two very different watches. Tough to tell... You really have to try it on.

Mike, do we share similar wrist size?
I dont have a measuring tape at home atm ( dont ask why ) , but from wrist shots which you have uploaded in other threads .e.g your bee, 15300ST ,etc etc, i deduce that its not that far off.

Am i right? haha

jontay02 · 22 January 2013, 04:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JorgeB

I tried the 15300 the other day and I own a SubC, i felt the AP wore a little smaller than the submariner. It looked great.

tad much of difference ?
I was offered a mint 15400 ST, so its hard to consider which model.

Still 6 more months before i head back to Singapore.

tifosi · 22 January 2013, 04:33 AM

I tried both the 15300 and the 15400 on in the same AD visit. The 15300 did not look bad. Not by a long shot. But since I would prefer to wear the AP as more of a sports watch, I liked the bigger look. Just the reasoning in my head. You opinion may vary.

jontay02 · 22 January 2013, 04:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tifosi

I tried both the 15300 and the 15400 on in the same AD visit. The 15300 did not look bad. Not by a long shot. But since I would prefer to wear the AP as more of a sports watch, I liked the bigger look. Just the reasoning in my head. You opinion may vary.

I'll be wearing it for any occasion.
It looks great in jeans and, even better under a suit. no flaw there.

Sports-wise, I'll hunt a FC diver within the years to come. Some people may not find it reasonable to purchase it at a premium without any chrono features. ( Just my 2cents). As such, I'll take my time for the time being and appreciate the 15300ST.

TSW · 22 January 2013, 06:13 AM

You would love it

T.S.Eliot · 22 January 2013, 06:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jontay02

Tried the Hulk the other day.
Then it got me thinking how the 15300ST will look like on my wrist.

Opinions anyone? No Ap Boutique / AD in my area at all.

How would the "Hulk" have you think of the RO 15300?

thomaspp · 22 January 2013, 08:03 AM

Really different watches those two. This might help your thought process (15400 pictured below.).

thomaspp · 22 January 2013, 08:12 AM

and these..

jontay02 · 22 January 2013, 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by T.S.Eliot

How would the "Hulk" have you think of the RO 15300?

well it could have been any timepiece really.
The hulk was 41mm.. which was 2mm larger than the 15300ST.

I happened to have this picture in my album and decided to upload it for some opinions.

If i had taken a wrist pic of my GMT IIC, you'd replace the word hulk with GMTIIC haha.

jontay02 · 22 January 2013, 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thomaspp

Really different watches those two. This might help your thought process (15400 pictured below.).

would it hurt to ask for a similar wrist shot to mine?

mmmm 15400.

bayerische · 22 January 2013, 07:05 PM

The Hulk is 40mm.

The 15300 is indeed 39mm, but it wears bigger, due to it's length.

bofon13 · 22 January 2013, 08:35 PM

Maybe this will help. ;)

Cru Jones · 22 January 2013, 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bofon13

Maybe this will help. ;)

what a pair!! nice pic.

thomaspp · 23 January 2013, 01:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jontay02

would it hurt to ask for a similar wrist shot to mine?

mmmm 15400.

here you go. good luck.

B. Doggy · 23 January 2013, 02:01 AM

Can't ever go wrong with a 15300

Le Chef · 23 January 2013, 05:47 AM

I love my 15300 and have a 7 3/4" wrist. I have no desire or interest to swap it for a 15400. The 15300 wears big enough for me.

AK797 · 23 January 2013, 06:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bofon13

Maybe this will help. ;)

Beautiful shot, one day...

tkhu888 · 23 January 2013, 07:08 AM

These shots make my incoming wait for my 15300st unbearable...

TSW · 23 January 2013, 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tkhu888

These shots make my incoming wait for my 15300st unbearable...

That's what we are here for

kilyung · 23 January 2013, 07:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TSW

That's what we are here for

You are bad my friend.

tifosi · 23 January 2013, 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thomaspp

Really different watches those two. This might help your thought process (15400 pictured below.).

This will be me soon!!! Except the 15400 will be black as well... Great pic!

descartes · 23 January 2013, 09:06 AM

My RO15300 feels similar in size to my GMTII

TSW · 24 January 2013, 02:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kilyung

You are bad my friend.

They don't call me The Enabler for nothing..right

22 January 2013, 02:14 AM	#1
jontay02 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: australia Watch: AP! Posts: 192	15300ST fitment Tried the Hulk the other day. Then it got me thinking how the 15300ST will look like on my wrist. Opinions anyone? No Ap Boutique / AD in my area at all.

22 January 2013, 03:31 AM	#3
Submarino "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Mr. H Location: Dallas Watch: them for me! Posts: 7,180	Fits very different than a SubC as it is way thinner and less chunky. It is a very comfortable watch for every day wear. __________________ WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle

22 January 2013, 04:04 AM	#4
tifosi "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Russ Location: Southern NJ Posts: 5,760	The Sub fits you nicely. Looks similar to the way the Sub-C fits me. I say 15400 cause that is what I prefer. __________________ Russ

22 January 2013, 04:33 AM	#8
tifosi "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Russ Location: Southern NJ Posts: 5,760	I tried both the 15300 and the 15400 on in the same AD visit. The 15300 did not look bad. Not by a long shot. But since I would prefer to wear the AP as more of a sports watch, I liked the bigger look. Just the reasoning in my head. You opinion may vary. __________________ Russ

22 January 2013, 06:13 AM	#10
TSW "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: TSW Location: Le Brassus Watch: Rolex & AP's Posts: 27,449	You would love it __________________ AP Owners Club IG @swiss.watch.connection

22 January 2013, 02:24 AM	#2
kilyung 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Cave Watch: Sundial Posts: 33,940	Two very different watches. Tough to tell... You really have to try it on.

22 January 2013, 04:25 AM	#5
JorgeB Banned Join Date: Jun 2012 Real Name: Paula Location: Wyoming USA Watch: El Primero 10th LE Posts: 118	I tried the 15300 the other day and I own a SubC, i felt the AP wore a little smaller than the submariner. It looked great.

22 January 2013, 08:03 AM	#12
thomaspp "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: N/A Posts: 11,137	Really different watches those two. This might help your thought process (15400 pictured below.). Attached Images __________________ Instagram: @watches_anonymous

22 January 2013, 08:12 AM	#13
thomaspp "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: N/A Posts: 11,137	and these.. Attached Images __________________ Instagram: @watches_anonymous

22 January 2013, 07:05 PM	#16
bayerische "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Andreas Location: Margaritaville Watch: Smurf Posts: 19,879	The Hulk is 40mm. The 15300 is indeed 39mm, but it wears bigger, due to it's length. __________________ Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

22 January 2013, 08:35 PM	#17
bofon13 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Europe Posts: 146	Maybe this will help. ;)

23 January 2013, 02:01 AM	#20
B. Doggy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Bryan Location: Oregon Posts: 7,399	Can't ever go wrong with a 15300 __________________ Rolex / Panerai / Omega

23 January 2013, 05:47 AM	#21
Le Chef "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Chicago Posts: 2,005	I love my 15300 and have a 7 3/4" wrist. I have no desire or interest to swap it for a 15400. The 15300 wears big enough for me.

23 January 2013, 07:08 AM	#23
tkhu888 Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Terry Location: Calgary, Canada Watch: RO/GMTIIc /PAM390 Posts: 106	These shots make my incoming wait for my 15300st unbearable...

23 January 2013, 09:06 AM	#27
descartes "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: North Shore Posts: 1,116	My RO15300 feels similar in size to my GMTII

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)