ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

hpowders · 19 April 2013, 01:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LA_LEC

Yes but you also paid more for it so one would expect that right.

Yes, I did pay more, but I got a terrific price (16.8% off retail list + sales tax) from a trusted dealer on the forum, so I'm happy.

Zman15 · 19 April 2013, 04:35 AM

either way it's a win!!

tomchicago · 19 April 2013, 04:36 AM

114060.

hpowders · 19 April 2013, 05:22 AM

I agree that either watch is a great choice.

broncophil · 19 April 2013, 06:53 AM

<------ see pic

melons · 19 April 2013, 10:34 AM

14060M, just can't seem to find any love for the new case.

gregmoeck · 19 April 2013, 11:16 AM

Pay the extra and get the new no date, its awesome

JohnFM · 19 April 2013, 11:40 AM

So what's the right answer? You folks all disagree! ;-)

Anyone own both?

19 April 2013, 04:35 AM	#62
Zman15 Banned Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: US Posts: 294	either way it's a win!!

19 April 2013, 04:36 AM	#63
tomchicago Banned Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Chicago Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270. Posts: 2,717	114060.

19 April 2013, 05:22 AM	#64
hpowders "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: Tampa, Fl Watch: Rolex 114060 Posts: 313	I agree that either watch is a great choice.

19 April 2013, 06:53 AM	#65
broncophil "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Cali Posts: 423	<------ see pic

19 April 2013, 10:34 AM	#66
melons "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: GMT -5 Watch: Rolex/Panerai Posts: 991	14060M, just can't seem to find any love for the new case.

19 April 2013, 11:16 AM	#67
gregmoeck "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Maui Watch: Patek Posts: 2,032	Pay the extra and get the new no date, its awesome

19 April 2013, 11:40 AM	#68
JohnFM "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: northern CA USA Watch: 114270 Explorer Posts: 479	So what's the right answer? You folks all disagree! ;-) Anyone own both?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 24 (0 members and 24 guests)