ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Nidal · 28 July 2013, 11:18 AM

You will regret it big time. You will be able to get a 114060 for the coming 10 yrs, you may never be able to get the Kermit again.

Billywiz · 28 July 2013, 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rolex75216

I think your 16610LV is pretty special. I would hang on to it.

Totally agree...keeeeep!

busytimmy · 28 July 2013, 01:54 PM

I wouldn't do the trade. I'd keep the LV and save for the 114060 ;)

SJCal90 · 28 July 2013, 02:50 PM

Nope.

Gaijin · 29 July 2013, 02:00 AM

No, please keep the LV. It will appreciate as you appreciate it on your wrist.

DAD · 29 July 2013, 11:31 AM

No, I have both. LV is a keeper. No date is nice but it's a flipper.

MortgageGuy · 29 July 2013, 11:35 AM

Not in my opinion

TSW · 29 July 2013, 08:46 PM

No!

Steelgold · 29 July 2013, 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rolex75216

i think your 16610lv is pretty special. I would hang on to it.

x2

DJWong · 29 July 2013, 10:25 PM

No.

Check · 30 July 2013, 01:28 PM

Thanks for all of your feedback.

My momentary lapse has passed and it will definitely stay on my wrist.

Cheers!

BaltimoreBrian · 30 July 2013, 02:00 PM

no

gr33n · 30 July 2013, 09:45 PM

Keep the LV. I wondered too about flipping mine.. but after two days, it was on my wrist again.
Do not underestimate the bracelet: imho it is better engineered than the new one, regarding the "K.I.S.S." principle. (keep it simple, stupid!)
Less parts, lighter, no springs, AND as efficient as the new one (except from the possibility to expand - retract it more easily).

For me, 16610 is the best watch ever made, aesthetically and from an engineer point of view, all brand known included.

akira23 · 30 July 2013, 09:49 PM

I would keep the LV!!!!!

Andad · 30 July 2013, 09:53 PM

I think I see a pattern here.
Keep the LV.

buke45 · 30 July 2013, 09:54 PM

No

polarinda · 30 July 2013, 10:35 PM

nope

bawlin · 31 July 2013, 12:55 AM

Why do people say you'll never be able to get an LV again? I see them for sale all over the place.

Personally I am/was torn between the two, but dollar for dollar I would rather buy something new and with warranty. But that's just me.

blcblc · 31 July 2013, 01:04 AM

no

29 July 2013, 11:35 AM	#37
MortgageGuy "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Adam Location: Orlando, Florida Watch: Me Posts: 9,935	Not in my opinion __________________ The richest people in the world look for and build NETWORKS, Everyone else looks for work... Robert Kiyosaki

29 July 2013, 08:46 PM	#38
TSW "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: TSW Location: Le Brassus Watch: Rolex & AP's Posts: 27,449	No! __________________ AP Owners Club IG @swiss.watch.connection

30 July 2013, 09:45 PM	#43
gr33n "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Real Name: Xavier Location: Switzerland Watch: 116600 Posts: 446	Keep the LV. I wondered too about flipping mine.. but after two days, it was on my wrist again. Do not underestimate the bracelet: imho it is better engineered than the new one, regarding the "K.I.S.S." principle. (keep it simple, stupid!) Less parts, lighter, no springs, AND as efficient as the new one (except from the possibility to expand - retract it more easily). For me, 16610 is the best watch ever made, aesthetically and from an engineer point of view, all brand known included. __________________ Liberty

30 July 2013, 09:53 PM	#45
Andad 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Eddie Location: Australia Watch: A few. Posts: 37,526	I think I see a pattern here. Keep the LV. __________________ E

28 July 2013, 11:18 AM	#31
Nidal "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: USA Watch: SubC LV Posts: 1,821	You will regret it big time. You will be able to get a 114060 for the coming 10 yrs, you may never be able to get the Kermit again.

28 July 2013, 01:54 PM	#33
busytimmy "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: Sydney, Australia Watch: ing the detectives Posts: 3,745	I wouldn't do the trade. I'd keep the LV and save for the 114060 ;)

28 July 2013, 02:50 PM	#34
SJCal90 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Real Name: Steven Location: USA Watch: 16610LV Posts: 163	Nope.

29 July 2013, 02:00 AM	#35
Gaijin 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Japan Watch: ing your back. Posts: 16,179	No, please keep the LV. It will appreciate as you appreciate it on your wrist.

29 July 2013, 11:31 AM	#36
DAD "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: USA Posts: 44	No, I have both. LV is a keeper. No date is nice but it's a flipper.

29 July 2013, 10:25 PM	#40
DJWong "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: Tom Location: Hongkong Watch: SubC, SD, DSSD Posts: 582	No.

30 July 2013, 01:28 PM	#41
Check 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Matt Vera Location: So Cal Watch: Explorer (124270) Posts: 314	Thanks for all of your feedback. My momentary lapse has passed and it will definitely stay on my wrist. Cheers!

30 July 2013, 02:00 PM	#42
BaltimoreBrian "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Real Name: Brian Location: Towson, MD Watch: iZ Posts: 2,224	no

30 July 2013, 09:49 PM	#44
akira23 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: Marty Location: Florida Watch: Pam 1313 Posts: 456	I would keep the LV!!!!!

30 July 2013, 09:54 PM	#46
buke45 Banned Join Date: Jun 2010 Real Name: Juan Location: Ponce, PR Watch: Your Butt Posts: 1,464	No

30 July 2013, 10:35 PM	#47
polarinda "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: Trav Location: singapore Watch: it Posts: 2,316	nope

31 July 2013, 12:55 AM	#48
bawlin "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: USA Posts: 210	Why do people say you'll never be able to get an LV again? I see them for sale all over the place. Personally I am/was torn between the two, but dollar for dollar I would rather buy something new and with warranty. But that's just me.

31 July 2013, 01:04 AM	#49
blcblc "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Somewhere Posts: 2,300	no

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)