|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
15 September 2013, 04:37 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: ex SF, back east
Posts: 531
|
not so good
|
|
|
|
15 September 2013, 10:59 AM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
|
What's wrong with older dial, dauphine hands, correct for the period and an older style folded link band ? I may have missed something about the serial, what do you mean. ?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free
__________________
watches many |
|
|
|
|
15 September 2013, 11:43 PM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Christopher
Location: Georgia, USA
Watch: ing the Sea...
Posts: 6,713
|
This one does look good to me. Please explain...
__________________
 "I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way." Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778 "Curmudgeons  " Favorites: 1665 SD, Sub Date, DSSD, Exp II, Sub LV, GMTIIc
|
|
|
|
|
16 September 2013, 06:49 AM
|
#4 |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,460
|
The seller sure could have put up some better pictures.
If I'm not mistaken the serial number would place this watch as produced circa 1958.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
