ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

MonBK · 11 December 2013, 02:31 AM

I think that in order to determine the stretch you have to hold the watch head in a straight verical position which in this case shows more stretch then the original picture.

Still not bad though but of course depending of the age of the watch.

Cc1966 · 11 December 2013, 02:33 AM

For a Presidential band, there is almost zero stretch present IMHO.

Nidal · 11 December 2013, 02:44 AM

Minimal stretch

joeychitwood · 11 December 2013, 03:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by azguy

You guys are either tough or unrealistic, that bracelet is about as good as it gets for pre-owned gold IMHO

I agree. It looks new.

brettpaul · 11 December 2013, 03:53 AM

Looking good!

samsmart · 11 December 2013, 04:01 AM

Looks great!

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 2

CWIN · 11 December 2013, 04:02 AM

Looks fine to me.

Andrew NYC · 11 December 2013, 06:04 AM

As others have said, looks pretty good. I've seen a few better but many more far worse. This one's got a lot of life left in it. Keep it clean and it'll last a very long time.

IAN1 · 11 December 2013, 10:10 AM

normal

Racerdj · 11 December 2013, 10:11 AM

Looks acceptable to me.

madgoncalves · 11 December 2013, 10:12 AM

Looks fine...

AmbSteve · 11 December 2013, 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kilyung

What stretch?

x2

TAKUYA · 11 December 2013, 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmbSteve

x2

x3

11 December 2013, 02:31 AM	#31
MonBK Banned Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Kingstown Posts: 58,279	I think that in order to determine the stretch you have to hold the watch head in a straight verical position which in this case shows more stretch then the original picture. Still not bad though but of course depending of the age of the watch. Attached Images

11 December 2013, 02:33 AM	#32
Cc1966 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Real Name: Christopher Location: Georgia, USA Watch: ing the Sea... Posts: 6,713	For a Presidential band, there is almost zero stretch present IMHO. __________________ "I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way." Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778 "*Curmudgeons* " Favorites: 1665 SD, Sub Date, DSSD, Exp II, Sub LV, GMTIIc

11 December 2013, 06:04 AM	#38
Andrew NYC 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: NYC Posts: 336	Looks good! As others have said, looks pretty good. I've seen a few better but many more far worse. This one's got a lot of life left in it. Keep it clean and it'll last a very long time.

11 December 2013, 10:11 AM	#40
Racerdj 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: Indianapolis Watch: Patek-Philippe Posts: 16,832	Looks acceptable to me. __________________ Rolex and Patek Philippe

11 December 2013, 02:44 AM	#33
Nidal "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: USA Watch: SubC LV Posts: 1,821	Minimal stretch

11 December 2013, 03:53 AM	#35
brettpaul "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Brett Location: Bahrain, Dubai Watch: Rolex and AP Posts: 5,538	Looking good!

11 December 2013, 04:01 AM	#36
samsmart "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Real Name: sam Location: Dallas, TX Watch: Me Tint Posts: 3,777	Looks great! Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 2

11 December 2013, 04:02 AM	#37
CWIN "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Real Name: Chris Location: San Diego Watch: Patek, AP, Rolex Posts: 4,449	Looks fine to me.

11 December 2013, 10:10 AM	#39
IAN1 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: California Watch: A Rolex of course. Posts: 1,067	normal

11 December 2013, 10:12 AM	#41
madgoncalves Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Location: NYC Watch: '85 1680, AP RO Posts: 148	Looks fine...

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)