ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
25 November 2013, 07:10 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Howell, NJ
Posts: 521
|
Im surprised by the votes....
everyone should own a Sub..... |
25 November 2013, 07:49 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Kyle
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Explorer 214270
Posts: 12
|
I had the same issue deciding between the Explorer and a Sub just a few weeks ago. When it came down to it, the Explorer won me over and I've been very happy with my decision. You really can't go wrong with either, so close your eyes and imagine what's on your wrist... then go out and get what you see!
|
25 November 2013, 09:02 AM | #33 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: Patek-Philippe
Posts: 16,832
|
I don't dive and really like my 2 Sub C's!
__________________
Rolex and Patek Philippe |
25 November 2013, 09:05 AM | #34 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,010
|
Quote:
|
|
25 November 2013, 09:34 AM | #35 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chuck
Location: SW Florida
Watch: 16233,16610,214270
Posts: 11,196
|
Both are great watches. I have a sub but I don't dive but I do wear it in the pool. I will one day get a EXP I as it's on my list. I think it's a great watch.
__________________
16233 Y Serial Datejust 16610 Z Serial Submariner 214270 Explorer 114300 Oyster Perpetual 76200 Tudor Date+Day |
25 November 2013, 09:38 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Kenny
Location: northern ireland
Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs
Posts: 5,136
|
Cant really go wrong with either - both excellent in every way!
|
25 November 2013, 09:40 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: Me now
Posts: 19,372
|
Congrats
|
25 November 2013, 12:23 PM | #38 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: PIttsburgh
Watch: Rolex 14060M
Posts: 453
|
Both are awesome. BUT Explorer is my favorite watch in current line up.
Congrats Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk - now Free |
25 November 2013, 09:14 PM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Alan
Location: Connecticut
Watch: 114270 16710B
Posts: 1,062
|
If you are planning on getting both eventually, get the Exp first - it goes with anything.
If you are planning on getting just one, get the Sub - it is the iconic Rolex and also goes with anything; it just won't fly under the radar when you want to be low-key. If you are like most here, you'll end up with both! |
25 November 2013, 10:44 PM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Trav
Location: singapore
Watch: it
Posts: 2,316
|
No bad choices here. But sub for me.
|
25 November 2013, 10:58 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
nothing wrong with a sub and a suit together
|
25 November 2013, 11:15 PM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: sam
Location: Dallas, TX
Watch: Me Tint
Posts: 3,777
|
|
26 November 2013, 07:05 AM | #43 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Richard
Location: Macungie, PA
Watch: 5513 Sub, LV Sub
Posts: 14,497
|
Submariner.
__________________
"Few things in life give man as great a pleasure as wearing a Rolex!" TRF's "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Patron |
26 November 2013, 07:17 AM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,181
|
When they put the correct size hands on the Explorer I'll get one. (the 36mm Exp is a little small for me). Until then, I guess I'm a Sub guy.
|
26 November 2013, 10:55 AM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Alejandro
Location: uruguay
Watch: your step!
Posts: 430
|
Tough... But sub...:thumbup:
|
26 November 2013, 11:22 AM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Manila
Watch: AP.Rolex.Pam.Tudor
Posts: 372
|
Sub First then Explorer Next :)
__________________
'13 Rolex116610LV Hulk / '16 Tudor BlackbayBronze / '57 Rolex6494 / '64 Rolex1018 / '74 Tudor9101/0 Ranger2 Auto / '94 Tudor 79090 Sub / '02 Tudor 72980 TigerChrono / '11 AP ROO Ti / '12 Panerai 372 / 71' Omega Cons / '91 TagHeuer 4000 Auto / '16 Seiko PADI turtle / '16 Seiko Sumo / Seiko 6139 speedtimer / Seiko Nano |
6 December 2013, 06:20 AM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Real Name: Jorge
Location: Switzerland
Watch: EXP
Posts: 78
|
Hi All,
Thank you for your opinions. We have an outcome: I decided to go for the Explorer 1, 14270, U series. I like the size, the fact that it is easily wearable with suit and could not really value the difference of the 11470. Also, being a U series, with Luminova and “Swiss” dial attracted me. But I did not stop here: I also bought a dress watch Cellini Danaos 6229/8 for my wife. Both were bought at Stropianna (eora.it), which was an experience by itself. I will review that on the Who’s who section. Photos will come, but only after Christmas… Regards, Jorge |
6 December 2013, 06:24 AM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: North Carolina
Watch: DD 118206
Posts: 1,858
|
Jorge,
Good for you. You made exactly the right choice...also the one I would have made....36mm. Timeless! The James Bond / Ian Flemming watch. This will be a keeper forever. The Explorer 1 WILL never and CAN never go out of style. The absolute most multi-functional watch made by Rolex IMHO. Bien hecho, jefe! Saludos, Elcompa |
12 December 2013, 05:21 AM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Real Name: Jorge
Location: Switzerland
Watch: EXP
Posts: 78
|
Hi All,
Although I said I would not use my new Explorer before Christmas, I could not resist. I decided wear it today and to bring it to one of the local AD, just to certify that all was ok and add a link (had to find a reason, right?). So I did, and was happy to know that it is the real deal. In fact, the movement is in pristine condition, as the watch overall. It is not really a surprise, as we can “feel the quality”, but I’m very happy for the confirmation. Great rating to the AD, Bucherer in Zurich, for their pleasant service and for charging only the extra link. I did appreciate that. I did not check the Cellini I bought for my wife. Perhaps will do it later on, but I’m very positive that all is ok. Now, I can’t resist to share with you one story: The Cellini is Christmas present for my wife. She has no idea about it and I wanted to add some spice to it. So, I told to my daughter, 6 years old, that I would offer a painting to her mother. I know that she would like it, but would be moderately excited. Of course that in the same day, my daughter said it to my wife (in front of me!!! You cannot trust children). My wife said: “It is unbelievable that you conduct successfully a company, and then trust on a 6 years old girl”. Ahahaha. The plan worked! I will have so much fun on 24th eve. Have fun, Jorge |
12 December 2013, 06:17 AM | #50 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: london
Posts: 416
|
I currently own a GMT which is very similar in someways to the style of the Sub. I am currently in the process of trading my GMT for a Explorer 39mm. The GMT is a beautiful watch and I love it, but for me it just screams Rolex and that is something I do not like. The reason for the trade is I want a quality classic design, that is also rugged and I think the Explorer captures all of this if its a daily wearer, one watch.
|
12 December 2013, 06:29 AM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: philip
Location: missouri
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 1,094
|
The Sub. is more useful - use it to time events, use it for elapsed time or future time, etc.
The new bracelet is an advantage. Plus it's wr to 300 meters. Dollar for dollar the best deal in the line. To me the 39mm Explorer's hands are too short. |
12 December 2013, 06:34 AM | #52 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
|
12 December 2013, 06:36 AM | #53 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
Quote:
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.