The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10 February 2014, 07:09 PM   #31
htc8p
"TRF" Member
 
htc8p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Bert
Location: philippines
Watch: 116710 ln
Posts: 3,472
good info there.

904l steel is still steel and quite soft. if you want to resist scratches then you should try ceramic the down side to that is it breaks in strong impact.
htc8p is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2014, 07:53 PM   #32
bondtoys
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: World
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,733
if you are worried about the softness of 904L steel, you should not even think about getting a gold watch....
bondtoys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2014, 09:09 PM   #33
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,061
No matter the material the watch is made from it will get digs and scratches when worn that's a fact.There is nothing magical about 904L steel it was developed for industries that use acid type products.Now although its a bit more corrosion resistant over 306L but with today's Rolex wearers and in general pampered watches it has no real advantage if watch follows normal routine service at RSC.Now if you have your watch in a stronger than normal acid solution or in salt water 24/7 then it could be a slight advantage.The 904L SS is not harder than the watch industry norm 306L in general hardness come from how the metal is tempered.In some ways 904L has disadvantages over 316L as 904L will scratch and show scratches more easily.Sure 904L costs more but that's down mainly to demand, far more 316L is sold over the 904L. Rolex used to quote at one time it costs more, and take 12 months to make a Rolex oyster which IMHO was just a brag factor.Now the only difference between 316L over 904L it has slightly more Molybdenum(Mo)approx 2% more, approx 1-2% more Crome(Cr),approx 1% more copper(Cu) and approx 10% more nickel and that's it all quite low cost materials.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2014, 01:12 PM   #34
kamek
"TRF" Member
 
kamek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Brian
Location: NYC
Posts: 534
Great info in this thread.
kamek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 February 2014, 09:48 PM   #35
Dirt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,064
To the OP.

You just need to be more careful.
Too hard on the gear.
Dirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.