ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
12 March 2014, 10:36 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: MichaelMancari
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Ap Diver 5513Rolex
Posts: 119
|
ROO Diver or ROO 42mm
The dilemma: I like the following watches for different reasons
-The Royal Oak Offshore stainless diver Beautiful and timeless. drawback- can't admire the momement -The new 42mm Royal Oak Offshore models I like the design and size and the return to a modest pushers in ceramic drawback- wish the bezel was ceramic Which watch would you purchase? Why? Any pics of the new ROO 42mm are welcome. Love you diver pics too |
12 March 2014, 10:56 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: US
Posts: 3,257
|
I would get one of the new 42 ROOs, or one of the 44 with the ceramic bezel.
|
12 March 2014, 11:57 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
|
Put me in the Diver camp (but ceramic or FC).
|
13 March 2014, 12:24 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 3,578
|
No diver for me. I prefer ROO 42 or 44
|
13 March 2014, 01:37 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: N/A
Watch: N/A
Posts: 1,373
|
I love the Diver for its timeless design and versatility.
If you have a small collection I would get the Diver...if you have a big collection go with a ROO chrono. |
13 March 2014, 03:36 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: Orange County, CA
Watch: Rolex, AP & Patek
Posts: 3,747
|
I would go carbon or ceramic diver over the new 42mm ROOs. It will prob take time before we see decent discounts from the $26k price on the new ROOs. The FC and ceramic can be had in the low $20s and I think both are great a great value in the AP ROO line up.
I would give up a modular chono feature for increased water resistance, a FC or ceramic case, ceramic bezel, and Ti caseback, plots and buckle. |
13 March 2014, 04:42 AM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
Diver for me but would like to see the grey ROO as well.
|
13 March 2014, 04:51 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Jim
Location: England
Posts: 416
|
Go for the ceramic diver, it's the best of both worlds as it has a display back. Good luck in your decision.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
13 March 2014, 05:03 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Tony
Location: UK
Watch: AP, Rolex, JLC...
Posts: 631
|
My vote is for the Diver. Great watch!
__________________
Kind Regards, Tony. |
13 March 2014, 06:32 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: MichaelMancari
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Ap Diver 5513Rolex
Posts: 119
|
Thanks everyone, a difficult decision awaits. Might wait a while and see
|
13 March 2014, 07:15 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: J
Location: El Lay
Watch: AP. Rolex. The end
Posts: 636
|
i would say one of the black Divers. they get the most wear out of my collection. PM me if you have any questions, would love to talk shop.
|
13 March 2014, 07:28 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,437
|
I'd get an FC or Ceramic Diver (as many above said).
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat???? |
13 March 2014, 07:53 AM | #13 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Thomas
Location: Midwest USA
Watch: AP PP Rolex
Posts: 3,348
|
I haven't seen the new 42's in the flesh...
But I know I LOVED my Diver and I want one back pretty bad. Such a nice piece - comfortable for everyday wear. If weight is a concern the new FC and Ceramic pieces are Rock solid too. |
13 March 2014, 07:57 AM | #14 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,008
|
42 ROO
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
13 March 2014, 01:26 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
|
I say diver! I love mine!
|
13 March 2014, 04:59 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 568
|
Diver for me. Prefer clean timeless dials.
|
13 March 2014, 09:38 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Geert
Location: Belgium
Watch: rolex/JLC/panerai
Posts: 5,612
|
I like the Diver, but I also like the new ROOs.
Would be a difficult question for me too |
13 March 2014, 10:05 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: N/A
Watch: N/A
Posts: 1,373
|
|
13 March 2014, 10:56 PM | #19 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,008
|
I certainly think the recently retired Rubberclads are destined to become classics as well and better yet already are!
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
13 March 2014, 10:59 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Real Name: Alex
Location: Europe
Watch: AP
Posts: 5,252
|
Diver fc or ceramic
|
14 March 2014, 01:05 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Manila
Watch: AP.Rolex.Pam.Tudor
Posts: 372
|
roo 42mm :)
__________________
'13 Rolex116610LV Hulk / '16 Tudor BlackbayBronze / '57 Rolex6494 / '64 Rolex1018 / '74 Tudor9101/0 Ranger2 Auto / '94 Tudor 79090 Sub / '02 Tudor 72980 TigerChrono / '11 AP ROO Ti / '12 Panerai 372 / 71' Omega Cons / '91 TagHeuer 4000 Auto / '16 Seiko PADI turtle / '16 Seiko Sumo / Seiko 6139 speedtimer / Seiko Nano |
14 March 2014, 04:33 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North West UK
Posts: 142
|
It may also be worth considering the royal oak chrono in this price bracket - could always get the conversion kit and wear it on leather or rubber too, would give a lot more versatility with the bracelet too
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.