The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12 March 2014, 10:36 PM   #1
mmancari
"TRF" Member
 
mmancari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: MichaelMancari
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Ap Diver 5513Rolex
Posts: 119
ROO Diver or ROO 42mm

The dilemma: I like the following watches for different reasons

-The Royal Oak Offshore stainless diver
Beautiful and timeless.
drawback- can't admire the momement
-The new 42mm Royal Oak Offshore models
I like the design and size and the return to a modest pushers in ceramic
drawback- wish the bezel was ceramic

Which watch would you purchase? Why? Any pics of the new ROO 42mm are welcome. Love you diver pics too
mmancari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2014, 10:56 PM   #2
s14roller
"TRF" Member
 
s14roller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: US
Posts: 3,257
I would get one of the new 42 ROOs, or one of the 44 with the ceramic bezel.
s14roller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2014, 11:57 PM   #3
texex91
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
Put me in the Diver camp (but ceramic or FC).
texex91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2014, 12:24 AM   #4
el1125
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 3,578
No diver for me. I prefer ROO 42 or 44
el1125 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2014, 01:37 AM   #5
diver2012
"TRF" Member
 
diver2012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: N/A
Watch: N/A
Posts: 1,373
I love the Diver for its timeless design and versatility.

If you have a small collection I would get the Diver...if you have a big collection go with a ROO chrono.
diver2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2014, 03:36 AM   #6
singe89
"TRF" Member
 
singe89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: Orange County, CA
Watch: Rolex, AP & Patek
Posts: 3,747
I would go carbon or ceramic diver over the new 42mm ROOs. It will prob take time before we see decent discounts from the $26k price on the new ROOs. The FC and ceramic can be had in the low $20s and I think both are great a great value in the AP ROO line up.

I would give up a modular chono feature for increased water resistance, a FC or ceramic case, ceramic bezel, and Ti caseback, plots and buckle.
singe89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2014, 04:42 AM   #7
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
Diver for me but would like to see the grey ROO as well.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2014, 04:51 AM   #8
Jim12345
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Jim
Location: England
Posts: 416
Go for the ceramic diver, it's the best of both worlds as it has a display back. Good luck in your decision.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Jim12345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2014, 05:03 AM   #9
tavv160
"TRF" Member
 
tavv160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Tony
Location: UK
Watch: AP, Rolex, JLC...
Posts: 631
My vote is for the Diver. Great watch!
__________________
Kind Regards, Tony.
tavv160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2014, 06:32 AM   #10
mmancari
"TRF" Member
 
mmancari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: MichaelMancari
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Ap Diver 5513Rolex
Posts: 119
Thanks everyone, a difficult decision awaits. Might wait a while and see
mmancari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2014, 07:15 AM   #11
FightOnSC!
"TRF" Member
 
FightOnSC!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: J
Location: El Lay
Watch: AP. Rolex. The end
Posts: 636
i would say one of the black Divers. they get the most wear out of my collection. PM me if you have any questions, would love to talk shop.
FightOnSC! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2014, 07:28 AM   #12
masterserg
"TRF" Member
 
masterserg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,437
I'd get an FC or Ceramic Diver (as many above said).
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat????
masterserg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2014, 07:53 AM   #13
gummy
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
gummy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Thomas
Location: Midwest USA
Watch: AP PP Rolex
Posts: 3,348
I haven't seen the new 42's in the flesh...

But I know I LOVED my Diver and I want one back pretty bad.

Such a nice piece - comfortable for everyday wear.

If weight is a concern the new FC and Ceramic pieces are Rock solid too.
gummy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2014, 07:57 AM   #14
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,008
42 ROO
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2014, 01:26 PM   #15
Hairdude1
"TRF" Member
 
Hairdude1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
I say diver! I love mine!
Hairdude1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2014, 04:59 PM   #16
exxondus
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 568
Diver for me. Prefer clean timeless dials.
exxondus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2014, 09:38 PM   #17
steveclocks
"TRF" Member
 
steveclocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Geert
Location: Belgium
Watch: rolex/JLC/panerai
Posts: 5,612
I like the Diver, but I also like the new ROOs.
Would be a difficult question for me too
steveclocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2014, 10:05 PM   #18
diver2012
"TRF" Member
 
diver2012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: N/A
Watch: N/A
Posts: 1,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by exxondus View Post
Diver for me. Prefer clean timeless dials.
I genuinely believe the Diver will become a classic.

I can't say the same about most of the ROO range...however much I love them!
diver2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2014, 10:56 PM   #19
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,008
Quote:
Originally Posted by diver2012 View Post
I genuinely believe the Diver will become a classic.

I can't say the same about most of the ROO range...however much I love them!
I certainly think the recently retired Rubberclads are destined to become classics as well and better yet already are!
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2014, 10:59 PM   #20
Audemars Piguet
"TRF" Member
 
Audemars Piguet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Real Name: Alex
Location: Europe
Watch: AP
Posts: 5,252
Diver fc or ceramic
Audemars Piguet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2014, 01:05 AM   #21
DOUGHN
"TRF" Member
 
DOUGHN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Manila
Watch: AP.Rolex.Pam.Tudor
Posts: 372
roo 42mm :)
__________________
'13 Rolex116610LV Hulk / '16 Tudor BlackbayBronze / '57 Rolex6494 / '64 Rolex1018 / '74 Tudor9101/0 Ranger2 Auto / '94 Tudor 79090 Sub / '02 Tudor 72980 TigerChrono / '11 AP ROO Ti / '12 Panerai 372 / 71' Omega Cons / '91 TagHeuer 4000 Auto / '16 Seiko PADI turtle / '16 Seiko Sumo / Seiko 6139 speedtimer / Seiko Nano
DOUGHN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2014, 04:33 AM   #22
Porker
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North West UK
Posts: 142
It may also be worth considering the royal oak chrono in this price bracket - could always get the conversion kit and wear it on leather or rubber too, would give a lot more versatility with the bracelet too
Porker is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.