ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Nurv1717 · 3 June 2014, 02:50 PM

Congratulations on two spectacular and historical pieces! I would be extremely interested to hear your comparison of the two bracelets in particular.

I was all but set that the 5711 was my next watch, but when I tried one on at my local AD, I have to be honest, the bracelet was a big turnoff to me. It felt flimsy and not very sturdy. Granted, maybe my opinion would change if I wore it for a full day. I do not doubt it is comfortable, but it just didn't feel solid for a watch of that caliber. However, the beefier bracelet on the Patek Nautilus chrono is perfection imo.

Would you be so kind as to enlighten me on the feel of the 15202 vs. the 5711? I am hoping that it is thicker and more solid and I am dying to try one on as I currently have my sights set on it.

Thanks in advance!

3 June 2014, 02:50 PM	#39
Nurv1717 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Portland, OR Posts: 63	Jumbos Congratulations on two spectacular and historical pieces! I would be extremely interested to hear your comparison of the two bracelets in particular. I was all but set that the 5711 was my next watch, but when I tried one on at my local AD, I have to be honest, the bracelet was a big turnoff to me. It felt flimsy and not very sturdy. Granted, maybe my opinion would change if I wore it for a full day. I do not doubt it is comfortable, but it just didn't feel solid for a watch of that caliber. However, the beefier bracelet on the Patek Nautilus chrono is perfection imo. Would you be so kind as to enlighten me on the feel of the 15202 vs. the 5711? I am hoping that it is thicker and more solid and I am dying to try one on as I currently have my sights set on it. Thanks in advance!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)