ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: SD or 14060M | |||
SD | 49 | 76.56% | |
14060M | 15 | 23.44% | |
Voters: 64. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
15 March 2008, 06:36 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Real Name: Jon
Location: UK
Posts: 2,405
|
Opinions please
Either tomorrow or mondays the day guys, so give us your thoughts.
SD or 14060M Just a few things: Believe it or not, this is a keeper I cannot flip. So it has to be right. I'm swinging towards the SD for reasons I've stated in previous threads. Thanks in advance
__________________
Whatever the watch, it's your wrist, it speaks to you, enjoy it |
15 March 2008, 06:38 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,571
|
In that case, go with the watch which has been tugging on your feelings for the longer period of time, the SD.
|
15 March 2008, 06:42 AM | #3 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Robb
Location: USA
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 4,939
|
I would go for the SD!!!
__________________
126610LN l 166610LV l 126619LB l 116710BLNR l 126710BLRO l 126720VTNR l 126718GRNR l 116500 white l 116500 black l 116508 john mayer l 116519LN l 116503 white l 126655 l 226627 Ti Master l 116518LN |
15 March 2008, 06:43 AM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Jocke
Location: Sweden
Watch: A dozen of Rolex's
Posts: 22,541
|
SD all the way.
Jocke
__________________
This message is written in perfect swenglish. What is best a custom Rolex or a Rolex that is stuck in custom? Buy a professional camera and you´re a professional photographer, buy a flute and you own a flute. |
15 March 2008, 06:45 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,740
|
Go with your heart, especially if you will never sell it. I love the 14060M no date, comfortable and clean, but I also love the SD, I have never owned one so I have no personal experience to pass on. If you are leaning towards the SD, don't get persuaded by others opinions, buy the one that you know deep down inside is the right choice. Do you need the date, because if you don't the ND Sub will save you some cash. Lets be honest here, they are both fantastic watches, you really can't make a wrong decision.
|
15 March 2008, 06:55 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Khanh
Location: Texas
Watch: SSGMTc
Posts: 1,227
|
SD is my vote!
__________________
Sea Dweller M series SS GMT IIc M series Omega SMP Electric Blue Dial Wife's SS WG MOP Ladies DJ Z series |
15 March 2008, 07:04 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Brandon
Location: FL
Watch: ing my second hand
Posts: 869
|
If you can only have one, and you;re going to keep it forever, you will want the date funtction on it. To me, it's that black and white!
|
15 March 2008, 07:07 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: Charlotte NC
Watch: SD & Exp II
Posts: 961
|
You already know which one...
__________________
16600 Sea-Dweller 16570 Explorer II (White Dial) |
15 March 2008, 07:11 AM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
Quote:
__________________
member#3242 |
|
15 March 2008, 07:17 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
Jon, do the right thing!
BUY THE SD!
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
15 March 2008, 07:21 AM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Stefan
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Watch: SS Daytona,GMT IIc
Posts: 470
|
Has to be the SD Jon.
Good Luck !! |
15 March 2008, 07:24 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
Ah, I just found your others posts. After reading that, I say you should buy the SD and when you get tired of it in three weeks, I'll buy it.
SD for sure...
__________________
member#3242 |
15 March 2008, 08:04 AM | #13 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: dan
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: keystone pocket
Posts: 5,917
|
forget the SD, buy a real watch
best, dan |
15 March 2008, 08:33 AM | #14 |
1,000,000th PostMember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
|
Voted for the 14060
__________________
GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN |
15 March 2008, 08:57 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
If it's one or the other......
|
15 March 2008, 08:59 AM | #16 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 3,478
|
NOT a fair comparison.
All TRue Sportos will eventually own an SD. |
15 March 2008, 08:59 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Tony
Location: Buffalo
Watch: 16613 (blue dial)
Posts: 1,329
|
I've always been partial to the SD...
|
15 March 2008, 10:42 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Buz
Location: Atlanta
Watch: Rolex Tudor Pam
Posts: 5,108
|
Voted SD. It seems that is what you really want.
__________________
Buz The faster you move, the slower time passes, the longer you live. Peter Diamandis |
15 March 2008, 12:45 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Jason
Location: at home
Posts: 5,098
|
I voted for the SD.
__________________
|
15 March 2008, 01:50 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: the other Lisa
Location: Metro New York
Watch: SS/RG Datejust
Posts: 1,014
|
I think the SD is the right watch for you.
__________________
Oyster Date 15200 : DJ Mid TT RG 178241: DJ SS 116234
Sub ND 14060M : PLATTY YM 16622 : Milgauss 116400 White |
15 March 2008, 02:03 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
SD, for the date function and added heft.
|
15 March 2008, 02:05 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Richard
Location: LV, NV
Watch: LV Sub and others
Posts: 2,689
|
SD all the way my friend.
__________________
Always working...by choice |
15 March 2008, 03:04 PM | #23 | |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
Quote:
If DATE is important to you.....then it goes without saying, this one!!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
|
15 March 2008, 03:06 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Vernon
Location: C-a-n-a-d-a
Watch: 16600
Posts: 5,641
|
SD coz you'll always need the date + it's the ultimate Rolex dive watch.
__________________
I'm just a cook... |
15 March 2008, 03:40 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: US
Posts: 468
|
I vote for the 14060m. Its lighter than the SD, thinner, and closest to the "original sub, and the symmetry of the no date dial is beautiful. Plus in the "wild" they are probably just as rare as the SD
|
15 March 2008, 04:54 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Nick
Location: Sonoma Co., CA
Watch: GMTIIc
Posts: 798
|
14060 is the classic and clean look my friend!
__________________
Present: 116710LN SS GMT-Master II C Past: 16610 SS Sub Date |
15 March 2008, 07:26 PM | #27 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
Sd...
Sd...sd...sd...sd...sd...sd...sd...sd...sd...sd...
|
15 March 2008, 07:54 PM | #28 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Simon
Location: UK
Posts: 568
|
SD, for all the reasons above.
I look forward to seeing some pics. Cheers - Simon |
15 March 2008, 07:59 PM | #29 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Michael
Location: LaLa Land
Watch: Sub Date 16610
Posts: 1,757
|
Def SD... ALL THE WAY!!!
:-) |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.