New bracelet on 16610?

[actionkwj]

As "pretty" as the new Subs are, I prefer the classic and non-"bling" design of the 16610. That said, the new solid bracelets and clasps are the bomb. Has anyone on the forum bought a new bracelet for their late model Sub? Assuming they're even the same lug width? Just curious and, of so, what's the cost of a new bracelet?

[nikhsub1]

Originally Posted by actionkwj

As "pretty" as the new Subs are, I prefer the classic and non-"bling" design of the 16610. That said, the new solid bracelets and clasps are the bomb. Has anyone on the forum bought a new bracelet for their late model Sub? Assuming they're even the same lug width? Just curious and, of so, what's the cost of a new bracelet?

Yes the new glidelock 97200 bracelet and clasp fit perfectly. I had one on my 16610LV. They are hard to come by, new they go for $2500 or so, used a bit less.

[cop414]

I'm pretty sure that this has been done, I believe that I remember pics of it here. Not sure of the cost but I do believe that it wasn't cheap.

[iWally]

Yeah i switched mine around, from my 116610 to my 16610lv and it fit perfectly, the newer bracelet feels a lot more refined and 'better' (cant think of a word right now). But that was when the 116610 was on a nato, now its back on its 97200 and the 16610lv on its original bracelet.

[Ste_J]

Here is a pic of a glidelock bracelet on a 16710. It will also fit a 16610. I too prefer the older style case but the modern bracelet and clasp quality and weight.

Best of both worlds. Not cheap but worth every penny

Ste

[jeremyam]

Expensive mod: think Tudor Blackbay or an IWC Mark XVI...

I too enjoy the solid bracelet of the newer sport models but I prefer the older clasp... Takes scratches and desk-diving much better...

[padi56]

Originally Posted by actionkwj

As "pretty" as the new Subs are, I prefer the classic and non-"bling" design of the 16610. That said, the new solid bracelets and clasps are the bomb. Has anyone on the forum bought a new bracelet for their late model Sub? Assuming they're even the same lug width? Just curious and, of so, what's the cost of a new bracelet?

There is nothing wrong with the bracelet on your watch now,but the new type bracelet will fit.Plus the new type clasp will fit the old type bracelets but the clasp alone if you could get one will cost around $1300 on its own.In the real world this Internet term "hollow link" is a complete and utter misnomer all it means is simply this. All the links are made from heavy solid gold or solid S.steel tubing and then formed into shape in a press. This leaves a void in the center, just like any other piece of tube,however, the tubes are still made from solid 18Ct gold or solid SS.

While the newer so called solid link bracelet might feel more substantial the newer type or so called solid links are still machined but they are machined with holes drilled right through the metal. So in the real world they are as well technically hollow but not to the same extent as the older type.And in every day wearing would doubt if any real difference in strength or longevity of life as long as you keep them clean. Thats the simple answer in the life of any Rolex oyster bracelet keep it clean and they will last 20-30 years plus.Even the older type Oyster bracelets have been stress tested and will take 525 lbs pressure before breaking and that's enough to seriously damage your wrist.Afraid today many believe that if its heavier it must be better and this is not always the case especially in watches.