The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18 July 2013, 03:29 PM   #31
Watchguy69
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Ferdie
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 115
Some additional info:

All 5 APs were purchased new around 2 months ago, all within a period of a month.

As many of you know, the 15202 uses an older movement (ref 2121), co-developed by JLC. Thus, I can understand if it behaves differently from the ROO movements.

The 42 FC Diver uses the Calibre 3120 movement. The 42 Navy, 44 FC Chrono, and Ti Schumacher use the Calibre 3126 movement, which is based on the 3120.

While I am trying to find plausible reasons why 3 out of 5 new watches are running fast, I don't think inaccuracy is acceptable for any watch at this price level (or even at half of it).

One out of 5 would suggest an occasional unit that got past QC. 3 out of 5 within a one month period would suggest a design or manufacturing issue.

Within (what is for me) a large watch collection that includes pieces from Rolex, PP, Panerai, IWC, and Tag, these 3 APs are the only ones that run fast over a brief timeframe (easily noticeable over one week), when maintained on watch winders. I am currently observing how they behave when not maintained on winders, and cycled between full power/dead stop.

When worn on the wrist, I don't subject my watches to significant activity. They remain on my wrist all day as I perform typical day-to-day activities, unless I play a sport.
Watchguy69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 July 2013, 03:09 AM   #32
dpkong
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Don
Location: Borneo
Watch: it!
Posts: 864
Watchguy69,

Your posts provide very interesting information. This is pointing more towards a problem with the mainspring and rebanking issue. Letting the watch stop and just having enough power to start plus minimal activity while wearing the watch would imply the mainspring is not fully wound and not rebanking.

A watch should keep reasonable accuracy regardless whether the mainspring is fully wound or not. Am really looking forward to more results from you. I will also try let my ROO wind down by not wearing it. That's a really hard thing to do without a spare AP...
dpkong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 July 2013, 12:34 PM   #33
Hanz079
"TRF" Member
 
Hanz079's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpkong View Post
Watchguy69,

Your posts provide very interesting information. This is pointing more towards a problem with the mainspring and rebanking issue. Letting the watch stop and just having enough power to start plus minimal activity while wearing the watch would imply the mainspring is not fully wound and not rebanking.

A watch should keep reasonable accuracy regardless whether the mainspring is fully wound or not. Am really looking forward to more results from you. I will also try let my ROO wind down by not wearing it. That's a really hard thing to do without a spare AP...
Time to get a spare AP then...
Hanz079 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2014, 01:50 PM   #34
Aarcher@McDGA
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: McDonough, GA
Watch: 116710BLNR 15400ST
Posts: 303
I dug up this old thread because I just purchased a I serial 15400ST and it is running fast on my wrist. I will let the reserve run out, wind it and wear it and it always picks back up to running fast. Goes on the night stand over night and does not gain as much time. It will begin to pickup seconds after about an hour. It gains up to 2 minutes over 24 hours. I am going to log time for a week and then i will send it to Clearwater.

Does anyone have advice for how particularly I should explain the problem so AP is sure to make the proper adjustments.

Thank you,

AA
Aarcher@McDGA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2014, 01:56 AM   #35
Royalex
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 762
This is really 3120 well known issue.
Royalex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2014, 02:10 AM   #36
VICI
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Gotham City
Watch: IG: Mr_Right_NYC
Posts: 5,672
Tell them that it runs ___ seconds fast / day and to check it out
VICI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2014, 02:28 AM   #37
bzabodyn
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: NYC
Watch: Patek / AP / Rolex
Posts: 794
I'm probably jinxing myself here, but my AP 15400 is my most accurate mechanical watch I currently own and that's including Breitling/Rolex/Panerai COSC watches - +1 sec over the course of 6 days being fully wound on day one and worn twice throughout the week for prob 12hrs/time. Next closest was Breitling +6 sec.

BZ
bzabodyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2014, 04:36 AM   #38
Aarcher@McDGA
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: McDonough, GA
Watch: 116710BLNR 15400ST
Posts: 303
So Alex it sounds like I'm right on with my plan. I will log it for a few days and use my results to report the time gained to APSC. How should I initiate the service, through the internet?

And Royalex you are saying that they should easily figure out what's going on since it is a common problem.

And bzabodyn you are just rubbing it in. Lol.

Thanks guys.

AA
Aarcher@McDGA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2014, 04:44 AM   #39
leisen
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Spain
Posts: 250
The 3120 caliber is very nice but it seems to be fragile. My "F" series RO was running very fast (about 30 minutes every day) only when it was on my wrist. Once on the table or in the box it was accurate. Sent to AP it was fixed but the cost was 1100 EUR. Now everything goes smoothly.
leisen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2014, 08:42 AM   #40
Aarcher@McDGA
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: McDonough, GA
Watch: 116710BLNR 15400ST
Posts: 303
Whoa Leisen. Mine is under warranty. I hope they will cover it without a charge. Surely they will.

Quote:
Originally Posted by leisen View Post
The 3120 caliber is very nice but it seems to be fragile. My "F" series RO was running very fast (about 30 minutes every day) only when it was on my wrist. Once on the table or in the box it was accurate. Sent to AP it was fixed but the cost was 1100 EUR. Now everything goes smoothly.
Aarcher@McDGA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 August 2014, 12:47 AM   #41
descartes
"TRF" Member
 
descartes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: North Shore
Posts: 1,116
A little update. Several months ago I reported in this thread that my new 15300 was running about 45 secs per day. The watch appears to have "broken in" and its now running only about 8 secs fast per day which appears to be within AP spec (though still alittle off from COSC spec). It's possible that it sat on a shelf at the AD for some period of time before I purchased it and it needed to be worn. At this point, I'm happy I didn't send it in for servicing.
__________________
I have a weakness for Travel Watches, Platinum, Vintage Rolex and 1960s Divers
descartes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 August 2014, 06:13 AM   #42
JorgeCCW
"TRF" Member
 
JorgeCCW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Jorge
Location: Ohio, USA
Watch: Rolex,Patek and AP
Posts: 4,707
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpkong View Post
What causes a 3126/3840 movement to run faster when worn?

From my timing, I found that my ROO gained 94s when worn between 9am till 6.45pm. When left off the wrist, it gained about 14s between 6.45pm to 9am the next morning.

Is this the 'rebanking' issue that some have spoken about? Is it a simple case of minor adjustment needed or is a major service required?

The watch is about 1.5 years old and still under warranty but the nearest APSC is Singapore.

Thanks all!
Wow, sorry I am late to the thread. I used to own a 15300 H series (now gone) and I had a similar problem. Mine was running 22 secs fast on the wrist (12 hrs) and 2 secs fast on the safe (12 hrs) what makes a total of 24 secs fast. Send it to Clearwater FL, it took them like 4 -5 weeks to fix it (not bad). And yes they said the movement is rebanking and all they did was change the main spring. It worked, because after that, it gained 11 secs on the wrist and about 1 sec on the safe , that's 12 secs/day. Don't think that's great but at that point you can't do nothing because 12 sec is with in range for this movement.
I deal with Betsy, very nice lady, always courteous
Quote:
Originally Posted by benlee View Post
I have been wearing my RO15400 for 10 days continuously now and although I did not time it exactly, I think it has gained about 2 mins so far. This is the first time I am wearing my RO as a daily watch and also the first time I notice this.
Well Ben, 10 days 2 mins fast means 12 secs fast a day. And according to AP that is with in range, so I don't think they consider that a problem.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Royalex View Post
This is really 3120 well known issue.
Yes but I thought that ended with the H series right ? My assumption is that I series is fine, right ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by descartes View Post
A little update. Several months ago I reported in this thread that my new 15300 was running about 45 secs per day. The watch appears to have "broken in" and its now running only about 8 secs fast per day which appears to be within AP spec (though still alittle off from COSC spec). It's possible that it sat on a shelf at the AD for some period of time before I purchased it and it needed to be worn. At this point, I'm happy I didn't send it in for servicing.
Happy for you ! Enjoy
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Nothing happens until something moves "
Albert Einstein
JorgeCCW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 September 2014, 03:31 AM   #43
dpkong
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Don
Location: Borneo
Watch: it!
Posts: 864
Just logged back in after a really long break and noticed this thread bump. I should have updated it earlier.

It wasn't an issue of the watch not being worn for a long time. I wore it regularly for about 4 months and it was consistently giving the same results. Finally, around November 2013, I sent the watch to APSC in Singapore and after explaining the issue to them, they agreed it needed a service and it was covered under warranty. They were apparently aware of what needs to be changed. Then 4 weeks later, the watch was ready and I've been using it since then. It runs virtually spot on regardless whether it's on the wrist on off and I haven't needed to make any adjustments except when I needed to flip the date.

So if anyone else is having the same issue, do explain the problem and have the watch fixed. I don't know if the 3126/3840 movement is COSC certified but it sure runs like it is after the service.

Hope this helps someone.
dpkong is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.