The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20 December 2014, 01:25 PM   #1
vubui
"TRF" Member
 
vubui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 68
Only Explorers?

My first Rolex was an Explorer II Polar 216570. I have been looking at the rest of the models, trying to choose another (and last for a while) Rolex, and realize the only other Rolex I love is the Explorer I 39mm.

Is it crazy to only own the two Explorers as the only Rolex watches in a collection? (I also have a Speedy Pro and a Tag Heuer Carrera Heritage Calibre 6) I love the BLNR but am not crazy about it actually on my wrist, the same goes for the Sub.
vubui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2014, 02:31 PM   #2
Jidonsu
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 258
Those are two different looking watches, so it's not crazy.
__________________
Current Collection

Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 15400 | Rolex 114060 | Rolex 116710BLNR | Tudor Black Bay GMT | Tudor Pelagos Blue | IWC Mark XVIII Le Petit Prince |
Jidonsu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2014, 02:36 PM   #3
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
Both great models. I just wish they offered it in gold.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2014, 02:37 PM   #4
Quotron
"TRF" Member
 
Quotron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: ...
Posts: 222
Only Explorers would be an excellent collection. Covers just about all of your bases
Quotron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2014, 02:39 PM   #5
sickened1
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
sickened1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Ed
Location: SoCal
Watch: ugiveiswatchuget
Posts: 9,054
Yah, you should start an Explorer-only collection (Polar, black dial and Explorer I)... oh and don't forget 16570 too.
sickened1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2014, 02:41 PM   #6
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,055
Not crazy at all. Good that you know what you like-and what you don't.
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2014, 02:52 PM   #7
kneedeep
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Not 2 far from u
Posts: 3,457
Nothing wrong with an Explorer collection, they are great.
kneedeep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2014, 02:55 PM   #8
FiftyTwoEighty
2024 Pledge Member
 
FiftyTwoEighty's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Woody
Location: Surf City USA
Watch: me live @the Beach
Posts: 1,794
Nothing wrong with two Explorers in a collection! I love both of mine!
__________________

Some 4 digits, 5 digits, and 6 digits

2FA
FiftyTwoEighty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2014, 02:58 PM   #9
AmbSteve
"TRF" Member
 
AmbSteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Steve
Location: San Angelo, TX
Watch: Rlx,Omega,JLC,Breg
Posts: 1,699
Black dial Daytona
__________________
AmbSteve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2014, 02:59 PM   #10
Boothroyd
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Boothroyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Watch: Wilsdorf(s)
Posts: 10,260
Not at all!
__________________
Explorer 214270 MK I/Datejust II Black 116300/Tudor Heritage Black Bay Black 79220N
Boothroyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2014, 03:39 PM   #11
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
They're two completely different watches, so as noted above, it's not a bad choice and those two cover a lot of bases.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2014, 03:52 PM   #12
sea-dweller
"TRF" Member
 
sea-dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
I have three Explorer's, so no!!!
sea-dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2014, 12:05 AM   #13
vubui
"TRF" Member
 
vubui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 68
Sounds like I'm in good company! :)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
vubui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2014, 12:11 AM   #14
Jack T
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,719
I like your thinking. The Explorer was my third Rolex, had it been my first, it could have been my only!
Attached Images
 
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R;
Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT
Jack T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2014, 12:13 AM   #15
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
I know one collector that has nothing but Explorers. Something like a dozen. Tight focused collection with a ton of history.
mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2014, 12:19 AM   #16
~JJ
"TRF" Member
 
~JJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Chicago
Watch: explorer
Posts: 2,292
I have both and went polar for the 2. In all honesty, besides the name there is no overlap... Very different models in design and feeling on the wrist.
~JJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2014, 12:30 AM   #17
cop414
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
cop414's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 72,270
Nothing wrong with that, nothing at all. How about an Exp II polar, another black dial and an Exp I... that would make a great trio!
__________________

Rolex Submariner 14060M
Omega Seamaster 2254.50
DOXA Professional 1200T

Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron
P Club Member #17
2 FA ENABLED
cop414 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2014, 12:33 AM   #18
cangelosijeff
"TRF" Member
 
cangelosijeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Jeff
Location: USA
Watch: LV
Posts: 395
Absolutely. For a while this was my collection, eventually I flipped the polar for a Hulk, but miss having a white dial:

cangelosijeff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2014, 12:33 AM   #19
Rags
2024 Pledge Member
 
Rags's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chuck
Location: SW Florida
Watch: 16233,16610,214270
Posts: 11,196
Here's my new Exp 1



Rags
__________________
16233 Y Serial Datejust
16610 Z Serial Submariner
214270 Explorer

114300 Oyster Perpetual
76200 Tudor Date+Day
Rags is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2014, 12:37 AM   #20
mps354
2024 Pledge Member
 
mps354's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: CT
Posts: 9,099
Can't have too many explorers...I have a polar 16570 and a 1016, and hope to get a 1655 at some point
mps354 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2014, 03:06 AM   #21
Friar
"TRF" Member
 
Friar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Gary
Location: Oregon
Watch: 214270 216570
Posts: 707
The best of the best.....It's not crazy, just common sense!

Name:  Rolex twins.jpg
Views: 293
Size:  84.0 KB
Friar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2014, 03:16 AM   #22
floridaBMW
"TRF" Member
 
floridaBMW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Florida
Watch: IWC 5454-07
Posts: 225
Love my polar, it is incredibly versatile.

Ken

floridaBMW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2014, 03:29 AM   #23
Choo Yao Chuen
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 518
You are only crazy; to think you are crazy!
Choo Yao Chuen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2014, 04:40 AM   #24
sturgeon123456
"TRF" Member
 
sturgeon123456's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,551
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
Both great models. I just wish they offered it in gold.
I think an explorer 2 with ceramic bezel in gold would be amazing.

And to the OP...nothing wrong with owning an explorer and an explorer 2! I think thats a great idea as they are both fantastic pieces and you will see a lot less of them than Subs and GMTs out in the wild.
sturgeon123456 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2014, 05:15 AM   #25
toomuchtalk
"TRF" Member
 
toomuchtalk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 2,253
Quote:
Originally Posted by FiftyTwoEighty View Post
Nothing wrong with two Explorers in a collection! I love both of mine!
toomuchtalk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2014, 05:33 AM   #26
Jason71
"TRF" Member
 
Jason71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
I understand the allure. I love mine

__________________
Best Regards,
Jason


Just Say "NO" to Polishing
Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons
LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches
PLEXI IS SEXY
Jason71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2014, 05:35 AM   #27
Catyack
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Gone
Posts: 217
Why not? They're actually much different watches, and both great!
Catyack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2014, 05:49 AM   #28
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack T View Post
I like your thinking. The Explorer was my third Rolex, had it been my first, it could have been my only!
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2014, 05:50 AM   #29
toneafficianado
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
toneafficianado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Alan
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,204
It would be a true "collection" because the two are linked by the name but to have a black and a white dial Rolex is fantastic for any reason. You will love it!
toneafficianado is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2014, 08:59 AM   #30
maxbaris
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Baris
Location: Toronto
Watch: Rolex Explorer I
Posts: 477
Owned both the 36mm and 39mm Explorer I simultaneously for a brief period and I didn't think I was crazy. So shouldn't you! Lol. Explorer is the best Rolex ever made, IMHO.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
maxbaris is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.