ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
20 December 2014, 01:25 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 68
|
Only Explorers?
My first Rolex was an Explorer II Polar 216570. I have been looking at the rest of the models, trying to choose another (and last for a while) Rolex, and realize the only other Rolex I love is the Explorer I 39mm.
Is it crazy to only own the two Explorers as the only Rolex watches in a collection? (I also have a Speedy Pro and a Tag Heuer Carrera Heritage Calibre 6) I love the BLNR but am not crazy about it actually on my wrist, the same goes for the Sub. |
20 December 2014, 02:31 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 258
|
Those are two different looking watches, so it's not crazy.
__________________
Current Collection Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 15400 | Rolex 114060 | Rolex 116710BLNR | Tudor Black Bay GMT | Tudor Pelagos Blue | IWC Mark XVIII Le Petit Prince | |
20 December 2014, 02:36 PM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
Both great models. I just wish they offered it in gold.
|
20 December 2014, 02:37 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: ...
Posts: 222
|
Only Explorers would be an excellent collection. Covers just about all of your bases
|
20 December 2014, 02:39 PM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Ed
Location: SoCal
Watch: ugiveiswatchuget
Posts: 9,054
|
Yah, you should start an Explorer-only collection (Polar, black dial and Explorer I)... oh and don't forget 16570 too.
|
20 December 2014, 02:41 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,055
|
Not crazy at all. Good that you know what you like-and what you don't.
|
20 December 2014, 02:52 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Not 2 far from u
Posts: 3,457
|
Nothing wrong with an Explorer collection, they are great.
|
20 December 2014, 02:55 PM | #8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Woody
Location: Surf City USA
Watch: me live @the Beach
Posts: 1,794
|
Nothing wrong with two Explorers in a collection! I love both of mine!
__________________
Some 4 digits, 5 digits, and 6 digits 2FA |
20 December 2014, 02:58 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Steve
Location: San Angelo, TX
Watch: Rlx,Omega,JLC,Breg
Posts: 1,699
|
Black dial Daytona
__________________
|
20 December 2014, 02:59 PM | #10 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Watch: Wilsdorf(s)
Posts: 10,260
|
Not at all!
__________________
Explorer 214270 MK I/Datejust II Black 116300/Tudor Heritage Black Bay Black 79220N |
20 December 2014, 03:39 PM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
|
They're two completely different watches, so as noted above, it's not a bad choice and those two cover a lot of bases.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
20 December 2014, 03:52 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
I have three Explorer's, so no!!!
|
21 December 2014, 12:05 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 68
|
Sounds like I'm in good company! :)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
21 December 2014, 12:11 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,719
|
I like your thinking. The Explorer was my third Rolex, had it been my first, it could have been my only!
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R; Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT |
21 December 2014, 12:13 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
I know one collector that has nothing but Explorers. Something like a dozen. Tight focused collection with a ton of history.
|
21 December 2014, 12:19 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Chicago
Watch: explorer
Posts: 2,292
|
I have both and went polar for the 2. In all honesty, besides the name there is no overlap... Very different models in design and feeling on the wrist.
|
21 December 2014, 12:30 AM | #17 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 72,270
|
Nothing wrong with that, nothing at all. How about an Exp II polar, another black dial and an Exp I... that would make a great trio!
__________________
Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron P Club Member #17 2 FA ENABLED
|
21 December 2014, 12:33 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Jeff
Location: USA
Watch: LV
Posts: 395
|
Absolutely. For a while this was my collection, eventually I flipped the polar for a Hulk, but miss having a white dial:
|
21 December 2014, 12:33 AM | #19 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chuck
Location: SW Florida
Watch: 16233,16610,214270
Posts: 11,196
|
Here's my new Exp 1
Rags
__________________
16233 Y Serial Datejust 16610 Z Serial Submariner 214270 Explorer 114300 Oyster Perpetual 76200 Tudor Date+Day |
21 December 2014, 12:37 AM | #20 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: CT
Posts: 9,099
|
Can't have too many explorers...I have a polar 16570 and a 1016, and hope to get a 1655 at some point
|
21 December 2014, 03:06 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Gary
Location: Oregon
Watch: 214270 216570
Posts: 707
|
The best of the best.....It's not crazy, just common sense!
|
21 December 2014, 03:16 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Florida
Watch: IWC 5454-07
Posts: 225
|
Love my polar, it is incredibly versatile.
Ken |
21 December 2014, 03:29 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 518
|
You are only crazy; to think you are crazy!
|
21 December 2014, 04:40 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,551
|
I think an explorer 2 with ceramic bezel in gold would be amazing.
And to the OP...nothing wrong with owning an explorer and an explorer 2! I think thats a great idea as they are both fantastic pieces and you will see a lot less of them than Subs and GMTs out in the wild. |
21 December 2014, 05:15 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 2,253
|
|
21 December 2014, 05:33 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
I understand the allure. I love mine
__________________
Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY |
21 December 2014, 05:35 AM | #27 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Gone
Posts: 217
|
Why not? They're actually much different watches, and both great!
|
21 December 2014, 05:49 AM | #28 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
|
21 December 2014, 05:50 AM | #29 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Alan
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,204
|
It would be a true "collection" because the two are linked by the name but to have a black and a white dial Rolex is fantastic for any reason. You will love it!
|
21 December 2014, 08:59 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Baris
Location: Toronto
Watch: Rolex Explorer I
Posts: 477
|
Owned both the 36mm and 39mm Explorer I simultaneously for a brief period and I didn't think I was crazy. So shouldn't you! Lol. Explorer is the best Rolex ever made, IMHO.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 5 (0 members and 5 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.