ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
15 December 2014, 01:43 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Tony
Location: VA
Watch: Rolex 1803
Posts: 28
|
1968 vintage 1803
This is the 1968 vintage (serial 2.581.xxx) model 1803 that my grandfather passed down to me.
Another question, in addition to the link from my other thread, what would the correct box be for this model and year? I have seen some green ones with different codes embossed on the back, as well as some with a buckle. Thanks Tony |
15 December 2014, 04:50 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sweden
Watch: 1680
Posts: 1,874
|
That serial would place it in 1971 I believe.
My father bought a gold DJ in the early seventies, he got a 56 001 box with it. But there are plenty of inconsistencies regarding what box you got with your watch. |
15 December 2014, 05:00 AM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Rob
Location: Parrish fl.
Watch: Tt datejust 16233
Posts: 20,952
|
I'm going with 1970. (2500000). 1970 starts at (2900000) I believe.
__________________
Rolex Omega Tag Heuer |
15 December 2014, 06:28 AM | #4 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,692
|
Welcome, great looking example. Nice heirloom to have received.
I've got one from '71 or '72 (26XXXXX) and the boxes I've seen for them when I've looked around are the brown leather ones with the leather strap and buckle. At any rate that is what I found for mine. I think back in that time frame some wouldn't even bother with the boxes nor would the dealers necessarily give the correct box for the watch. |
15 December 2014, 06:32 AM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: So Cal
Watch: Rolex GMT 1675
Posts: 5,087
|
Very Nice! What a great watch.
__________________
“Anyone can be sarcastic; it takes intelligence to solve a problem!” |
15 December 2014, 06:38 AM | #6 | |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,692
|
Quote:
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=54362 According to that '70 began with 2504211. |
|
15 December 2014, 06:49 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
|
very nice watch ,
|
15 December 2014, 06:49 AM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Tony
Location: VA
Watch: Rolex 1803
Posts: 28
|
Here is the list I found.
http://www.bernardwatch.com/Rolex-Serial-Numbers Interesting that they are different. This list puts it in 1968. Tony |
15 December 2014, 06:50 AM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Tony
Location: VA
Watch: Rolex 1803
Posts: 28
|
|
15 December 2014, 07:13 AM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Tony
Location: VA
Watch: Rolex 1803
Posts: 28
|
Does Rolex offer a history service based on the serial number?
It did just come back from a factory service. Tony |
15 December 2014, 08:33 AM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Tony
Location: VA
Watch: Rolex 1803
Posts: 28
|
|
15 December 2014, 11:21 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,000
|
A classy Rolex in 1970 (ish) .....
.... and just as classy in 2014. A timeless design
|
16 December 2014, 07:54 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Jonas
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 988
|
Sweet watch!!
|
16 December 2014, 07:55 AM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,506
|
He took great care of that! Great dial and overall condition.
Cherish it. |
16 December 2014, 07:44 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough ;-)
Posts: 21,232
|
Love the black dial
And the watch is in really great shape Congrats |
16 December 2014, 10:28 PM | #16 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Tony
Location: VA
Watch: Rolex 1803
Posts: 28
|
Thanks everyone.
I was originally thinking of replacing the black dial with a gold one, but the black is growing on me. And that is the way it was when my grandfather bought it. Tony |
16 December 2014, 11:35 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 813
|
I agree. My 2.32m GMT is IV 1969.
__________________
GMT 1675 SS (1969) Tudor Big Block Chrono 79170 white-dial panda (~1993) Tudor Big Block Chrono 79180 black-dial panda (~1993) Tudor Sub 79090 (1992) |
16 December 2014, 11:38 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 813
|
Good grief, please don't replace that beautiful original dial! If you do, Rolex will keep the original. OTOH you could source a replacement outside the Rolex domain and keep the original stored in a safe place, but I still wouldn't violate that gorgeous thing.
__________________
GMT 1675 SS (1969) Tudor Big Block Chrono 79170 white-dial panda (~1993) Tudor Big Block Chrono 79180 black-dial panda (~1993) Tudor Sub 79090 (1992) |
16 December 2014, 11:46 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Douglas
Location: Tokyo
Watch: but don't touch
Posts: 481
|
Beautiful. Pls don't mess with the dial
|
17 December 2014, 01:19 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: USA
Watch: 6263
Posts: 195
|
Please please please.....do not change that dial.
|
17 December 2014, 01:29 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
|
just say no to the dial swap
|
9 January 2015, 07:49 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 813
|
Correction
Correction on post #17: Case back date is "IV68", not "IV69" as previously stated.
__________________
GMT 1675 SS (1969) Tudor Big Block Chrono 79170 white-dial panda (~1993) Tudor Big Block Chrono 79180 black-dial panda (~1993) Tudor Sub 79090 (1992) |
9 January 2015, 12:17 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16713 & 116610LV
Posts: 368
|
Beautiful!
I have original box for my 2.55m serial 1803 but no pictures of the box... When I bought mine the seller said it was from '72, one registry said '68 and mine does not have the hack feature in the movement which should date it before '72 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.