ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
15 April 2008, 08:35 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Pacific
Watch: SS Daytona
Posts: 643
|
Water resistant/pressure lab tested only
Hi Guys
I was in New Zealand for the weekend on a business meeting, went to Mansors and a few other ADs, nice stuff all around. I picked up an IWC hard cover catalogue to read back on the flight home. In the dive watches ection, IWC (i admire their truth) specifically state that dive watches are water resistant tested in a lab in a special machine that simulates water resistance and pressure. Therefore these watches have never actually made it down that deep in a "live test". They also say that you should stay well clear of the maximum depth as in reality you can not be sure that the lab tested pressure will hold. So to my question: Is the Deep Sea lab tested to 3900 meters or did they do a live test also? Lab testing is easy, you could guarantee a lot of watches theoretically very deep tested in the lab on the pressure testing machine. Why pay so much for technology that is lab tested? Does the "ring lock" actually work at 3900 meters? |
15 April 2008, 09:00 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
The testing equipment for testing the DSSD was made following exact specs from COMEX. I have no doubt that the watch is indeed tested to show if it can withstand the pressure it is said to be able to handle and that the equipment used to test it will show as reliable results as had the watch been tested by letting it go down 3,900 metres under water.
A test of the current SD was made, though. The test is shown on Sheldon's page.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
15 April 2008, 09:03 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: Virginia, US
Watch: SD 16600
Posts: 4,319
|
I seem to remember reading somewhere the DS was actually tested to 5000m with no problems.
__________________
The fool, with all his other faults, has this also - he is always getting ready to live. - Epicurus (341–270 BC) |
15 April 2008, 08:29 PM | #4 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,534
|
Quote:
The new SD was tested to 5000M but the numbers were 'bad luck"?
__________________
E |
|
15 April 2008, 09:09 PM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Lee
Location: Malaysia
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,534
|
Quote:
5000 ain't that hot, and 4900 isn't much to write home about, but the 12800 is a winner!! |
|
15 April 2008, 09:32 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North America
Watch: their hands, baby.
Posts: 1,116
|
There's also the popular posting for the Sea Dweller where a Sea Dweller--not evidently part of any special Rolex test, just a standard Sea Dweller--is attached to the outside of a submersible, and taken down to 1220 meters.
Real world testing if ever there was. Chris |
15 April 2008, 10:33 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Real Name: Jon
Location: UK
Posts: 2,405
|
1) Rolex test all their watches beyond the guaranteed depth rating
2) The current SD has been to the actual depth rated in the real world 3) The SDDS has been lab tested only but using Comex as the testing partner 4) Rolex are the only comapny that guarantee the watch to be WATERPROOF. Most other comapnys use the term Water resistant, not sure how Rolex get away with stating Waterproof.
__________________
Whatever the watch, it's your wrist, it speaks to you, enjoy it |
16 April 2008, 12:02 AM | #8 | |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: Arlington, VA
Watch: Lange One MP
Posts: 4,043
|
Quote:
Gotta wave the BS flag on this one. MTM asserts they are the only WATERPROOF watch maker. Rolex website does say waterproof to a depth, which is basically water resistant. This is all more legalise that anything else, but Rolex is nothing special here. |
|
16 April 2008, 12:53 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Real Name: Jon
Location: UK
Posts: 2,405
|
Agreed, but if you check Rolex litrature they use the word Waterproof
__________________
Whatever the watch, it's your wrist, it speaks to you, enjoy it |
16 April 2008, 01:07 AM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
X2!!!
|
16 April 2008, 01:35 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: Arlington, VA
Watch: Lange One MP
Posts: 4,043
|
|
16 April 2008, 01:38 AM | #12 | |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: Arlington, VA
Watch: Lange One MP
Posts: 4,043
|
Quote:
From Blancpain on the Fifty Fathoms" The three new models embody the main signature features that forged the reputation of the original Fifty Fathoms and of its subsequent versions. The same professionalism is apparent in the decisive design choices, dictated by a wealth of experience in the field of diving, its risks and its imperious necessities. The same water resistance to 300 metres. The same oversized hour-markers and hands ensuring optimal readability. The same black dial and bezel colour, against which the luminescent indications make a striking contrast. From MTM: MTM Xtreme Ops Seal Squad Diver Watch is the first divers watch to be legally declared Waterproof ! Its depth is measured in fathoms and leagues rather than feet and meters. Its fluid filled 316L solid block stainless steel case cannot be compressed, regardless of the depth. Of course, most watches never see the bottom of a bath tub. How many diver's go to 300Ms? Not too many, the world record is only 313meters with sport equipment. Super hi-tech gear equipped USN personnel have reached 608 meters. Most watches are over engineered in this realm. |
|
22 April 2008, 09:25 PM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Sean
Location: West Florida
Posts: 2,671
|
Quote:
I wonder what pressure/depth it could actually withstand before failure Sean
__________________
"Life is frittered away with detail... simplify, simplify!" Henry D. Thoreau |
|
22 April 2008, 09:39 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Minas
Location: London UK
Watch: Rolex , Omega
Posts: 1,370
|
This is true. So, each time, the stated depth is the minimum one.
__________________
Rolex Oyster Perpetual GMT-Master ll Rolex Oyster Perpetual Datejust Omega Seamaster Professional Chronograph |
22 April 2008, 10:01 PM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: GB
Posts: 220
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.