The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15 April 2008, 08:35 AM   #1
sub2004
"TRF" Member
 
sub2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Pacific
Watch: SS Daytona
Posts: 643
Water resistant/pressure lab tested only

Hi Guys

I was in New Zealand for the weekend on a business meeting, went to Mansors and a few other ADs, nice stuff all around.

I picked up an IWC hard cover catalogue to read back on the flight home.

In the dive watches ection, IWC (i admire their truth) specifically state that dive watches are water resistant tested in a lab in a special machine that simulates water resistance and pressure.

Therefore these watches have never actually made it down that deep in a "live test". They also say that you should stay well clear of the maximum depth as in reality you can not be sure that the lab tested pressure will hold.

So to my question:

Is the Deep Sea lab tested to 3900 meters or did they do a live test also?

Lab testing is easy, you could guarantee a lot of watches theoretically very deep tested in the lab on the pressure testing machine.

Why pay so much for technology that is lab tested? Does the "ring lock" actually work at 3900 meters?
sub2004 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2008, 09:00 AM   #2
SPACE-DWELLER
"TRF" Member
 
SPACE-DWELLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
The testing equipment for testing the DSSD was made following exact specs from COMEX. I have no doubt that the watch is indeed tested to show if it can withstand the pressure it is said to be able to handle and that the equipment used to test it will show as reliable results as had the watch been tested by letting it go down 3,900 metres under water.

A test of the current SD was made, though.

The test is shown on Sheldon's page.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo

LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...
SPACE-DWELLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2008, 09:03 AM   #3
Letsgodiving
"TRF" Member
 
Letsgodiving's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: Virginia, US
Watch: SD 16600
Posts: 4,319
I seem to remember reading somewhere the DS was actually tested to 5000m with no problems.
__________________
The fool, with all his other faults, has this also - he is always getting ready to live. - Epicurus (341–270 BC)
Letsgodiving is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2008, 08:29 PM   #4
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,534
Quote:
Originally Posted by SPACE-DWELLER View Post
The testing equipment for testing the DSSD was made following exact specs from COMEX. I have no doubt that the watch is indeed tested to show if it can withstand the pressure it is said to be able to handle and that the equipment used to test it will show as reliable results as had the watch been tested by letting it go down 3,900 metres under water.

A test of the current SD was made, though.

The test is shown on Sheldon's page.
To be fair, that was one test of one SD. I don't think rolex strap every watch to that puppy.
The new SD was tested to 5000M but the numbers were 'bad luck"?
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2008, 09:09 PM   #5
Jedi
"TRF" Member
 
Jedi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Lee
Location: Malaysia
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,534
Quote:
Originally Posted by directioneng View Post
To be fair, that was one test of one SD. I don't think rolex strap every watch to that puppy.
The new SD was tested to 5000M but the numbers were 'bad luck"?
Good call Eddie, as it fits into my numerology conspiracy theory!

5000 ain't that hot, and 4900 isn't much to write home about, but the 12800 is a winner!!
__________________
Lee

This is my watch. There are many like it but this one is mine...

Flickr
Blog
Jedi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2008, 09:32 PM   #6
Solar
"TRF" Member
 
Solar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North America
Watch: their hands, baby.
Posts: 1,116
There's also the popular posting for the Sea Dweller where a Sea Dweller--not evidently part of any special Rolex test, just a standard Sea Dweller--is attached to the outside of a submersible, and taken down to 1220 meters.

Real world testing if ever there was.

Chris
Solar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2008, 10:33 PM   #7
Baptistman
"TRF" Member
 
Baptistman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Real Name: Jon
Location: UK
Posts: 2,405
1) Rolex test all their watches beyond the guaranteed depth rating
2) The current SD has been to the actual depth rated in the real world
3) The SDDS has been lab tested only but using Comex as the testing partner
4) Rolex are the only comapny that guarantee the watch to be WATERPROOF.
Most other comapnys use the term Water resistant, not sure how Rolex get away with stating Waterproof.
__________________
Whatever the watch, it's your wrist, it speaks to you, enjoy it
Baptistman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 April 2008, 12:02 AM   #8
BigHat
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: Arlington, VA
Watch: Lange One MP
Posts: 4,043
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baptistman View Post
1)
4) Rolex are the only comapny that guarantee the watch to be WATERPROOF.
Most other comapnys use the term Water resistant, not sure how Rolex get away with stating Waterproof.
Sorry,
Gotta wave the BS flag on this one. MTM asserts they are the only WATERPROOF watch maker. Rolex website does say waterproof to a depth, which is basically water resistant. This is all more legalise that anything else, but Rolex is nothing special here.
BigHat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 April 2008, 12:53 AM   #9
Baptistman
"TRF" Member
 
Baptistman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Real Name: Jon
Location: UK
Posts: 2,405
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigHat View Post
Sorry,
Gotta wave the BS flag on this one. MTM asserts they are the only WATERPROOF watch maker. Rolex website does say waterproof to a depth, which is basically water resistant. This is all more legalise that anything else, but Rolex is nothing special here.
Agreed, but if you check Rolex litrature they use the word Waterproof
__________________
Whatever the watch, it's your wrist, it speaks to you, enjoy it
Baptistman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 April 2008, 01:07 AM   #10
Trurolexer
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
X2!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baptistman View Post
Agreed, but if you check Rolex litrature they use the word Waterproof
X2!!!
Trurolexer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 April 2008, 01:35 AM   #11
BigHat
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: Arlington, VA
Watch: Lange One MP
Posts: 4,043
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baptistman View Post
Agreed, but if you check Rolex litrature they use the word Waterproof
Sorry DP
BigHat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 April 2008, 01:38 AM   #12
BigHat
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: Arlington, VA
Watch: Lange One MP
Posts: 4,043
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baptistman View Post
Agreed, but if you check Rolex litrature they use the word Waterproof
We're not at odds on that point. I said Rolex uses "waterproof" as do others. The Sub is waterproof to 300 meters. That's the depth caveat I was referring to and it's no different than "water resistant" to XX other than different lawyers wrote it.

From Blancpain on the Fifty Fathoms"

The three new models embody the main signature features that forged the reputation of the original Fifty Fathoms and of its subsequent versions. The same professionalism is apparent in the decisive design choices, dictated by a wealth of experience in the field of diving, its risks and its imperious necessities. The same water resistance to 300 metres. The same oversized hour-markers and hands ensuring optimal readability. The same black dial and bezel colour, against which the luminescent indications make a striking contrast.

From MTM:
MTM Xtreme Ops Seal Squad Diver Watch is the first divers watch to be legally declared Waterproof ! Its depth is measured in fathoms and leagues rather than feet and meters. Its fluid filled 316L solid block stainless steel case cannot be compressed, regardless of the depth.


Of course, most watches never see the bottom of a bath tub. How many diver's go to 300Ms? Not too many, the world record is only 313meters with sport equipment. Super hi-tech gear equipped USN personnel have reached 608 meters. Most watches are over engineered in this realm.
BigHat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2008, 09:25 PM   #13
seantk
"TRF" Member
 
seantk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Sean
Location: West Florida
Posts: 2,671
Quote:
Originally Posted by Letsgodiving View Post
I seem to remember reading somewhere the DS was actually tested to 5000m with no problems.
Rolex states the Deep Sea is pressure rated to 2.98 Metric Tonnes, which = 6570 PSI. This pressure would equate to a depth rating of approximately 14770 FT/ 4500m

I wonder what pressure/depth it could actually withstand before failure

Sean
__________________
"Life is frittered away with detail... simplify, simplify!" Henry D. Thoreau
seantk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2008, 09:39 PM   #14
Scarface
"TRF" Member
 
Scarface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Minas
Location: London UK
Watch: Rolex , Omega
Posts: 1,370
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baptistman View Post
1) Rolex test all their watches beyond the guaranteed depth rating
This is true. So, each time, the stated depth is the minimum one.
__________________
Rolex Oyster Perpetual GMT-Master ll
Rolex
Oyster Perpetual Datejust
Omega Seamaster Professional Chronograph
Scarface is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2008, 10:01 PM   #15
wristworks
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: GB
Posts: 220
Quote:
Originally Posted by seantk View Post
Rolex states the Deep Sea is pressure rated to 2.98 Metric Tonnes, which = 6570 PSI. This pressure would equate to a depth rating of approximately 14770 FT/ 4500m

I wonder what pressure/depth it could actually withstand before failure

Sean
Good info. Thanks.
wristworks is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.