ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
1 March 2015, 07:48 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Hilliard, OH, USA
Posts: 120
|
Weight of Explorer I versus Explorer II
Has anyone ever checked this in the current models?
I imagine the Explorer I would be a good bit lighter than the Explorer II. I have noticed that the Explorer II seems to way about the same amount as a Subc, but the feel is totally different. |
1 March 2015, 07:54 AM | #2 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CA, USA
Watch: Out!!!
Posts: 6,474
|
Quote:
I have both, Exp II and Sub-C, and although I don't have a scale that can measure them accurately, I would say that the Exp II is 10% heavier than the Sub. |
|
1 March 2015, 07:59 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Hilliard, OH, USA
Posts: 120
|
You are probably correct Tri-Tip. I was forgetting the comparison was with a tt Subc.
That would make a difference. I suspect that a tt would have to weigh more compared to ss |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.