ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

CaveDiver · 29 March 2015, 06:16 AM

Keld,
It comes down to what you want. I doubt there is much price difference in the two dials so cost should not be an issue. The dial in your 2.8mil watch defiantly did not come from the factory with that dial. Sometimes dealers play on words which to me shows their true character. Phases like original Rolex or all original Rolex to describe watch's parts when they should state all parts are authentic Rolex just not period correct. To me, when they do that it is misleading to the buyer.
Most likely your watch dates to 1970 rather than 1969 as well.
The dial that is period correct for your watch is like this:

29 March 2015, 06:16 AM	#1
CaveDiver "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Dallas Posts: 1,075	Keld, It comes down to what you want. I doubt there is much price difference in the two dials so cost should not be an issue. The dial in your 2.8mil watch defiantly did not come from the factory with that dial. Sometimes dealers play on words which to me shows their true character. Phases like original Rolex or all original Rolex to describe watch's parts when they should state all parts are authentic Rolex just not period correct. To me, when they do that it is misleading to the buyer. Most likely your watch dates to 1970 rather than 1969 as well. The dial that is period correct for your watch is like this:

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)