ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Jimbits76 · 5 April 2008, 03:15 AM

Dipsy!!!!!

J

watchboy · 5 April 2008, 03:27 AM

Well I think they cannot be compared. It depends on what one's needs. It one travels often, then the GMT is for him. If one dives often, then the GMT is not appropriate for him, so naturally the new SD is a the right choice.

I think a fairer comparison will be the new Sub vs the new SD.

For me I did not vote, cos I want them BOTH!!!!!!

Terry Newton · 5 April 2008, 03:37 AM

I have the TT GMT-Master IIc now and am very content with it. I also have an SS Date Sub for sport. I am an old man and wear old man watches. I'm satisfied with sticking with what I have.

Terry Newton

Woody · 5 April 2008, 03:38 AM

I am not impressed with the picturs of the DS that I have seen - perhps it will look better in the flesh but to my eyes the design package is rather OTT - the GMT11-C is a great watch and one I have enjoyed wearing for the last 9 months so that gets my vote. If I wanted a dive watch I would buy the standard Sub - great design and available at about half the price of the new DS.

watchboy · 5 April 2008, 03:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Terry Newton

I have the TT GMT-Master IIc now and am very content with it. I also have an SS Date Sub for sport. I am an old man and wear old man watches. I'm satisfied with sticking with what I have.

Terry Newton

Well Terry, I have seen man of your age drive a HOT FERRARI! So you never know!

Phew · 5 April 2008, 03:49 AM

Deepsea for me. It would be a difficult one if the Pepsi was there!

rob · 5 April 2008, 03:51 AM

for the price GMT II-C, for fun dssd.

DJF881 · 5 April 2008, 04:09 AM

I paid the old price for the GMTIIc in SS, and I am not ready to pay $9000 for a watch. Also, I wear a suit to work, and I think the Deap Sea is too big to be appropriate for work.

However, I think it's a gorgeous watch, a huge improvement on the old SD which I think was just a slight variant on the Sub. I want one.

TheDude · 5 April 2008, 05:14 AM

Remove the garish black "ring" lettering reminding us of the features and I'd be a lot more interested in an SDDS.

PhilM · 5 April 2008, 06:20 AM

Voted for the GMT, as I've already got the only SD that I want

Oscar · 5 April 2008, 06:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seantk

I voted for the SDDS, however if the 12800 on the SDDS turns out to be the price - then I would go with the GMT IIc

Sean

My thoughts exactly. If the price is over the top I'll stick with the SS GMT IIc.

DS/B MINI S · 5 April 2008, 06:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDude

Remove the garish black "ring" lettering reminding us of the features and I'd be a lot more interested in an SDDS.

Yep, that would convince me to get out my checkbook

Dave Kopf · 5 April 2008, 06:26 AM

GMT IIc.

I'm a small guy and about the only thing I could do with the SDDS is wear it around my waist (or hold it over my head?) and tell everyone I'm the WWF flyweight champion.

Brandonsan · 5 April 2008, 06:27 AM

I prefer the GMT 2

arthur_daily · 5 April 2008, 07:29 AM

It would be the GMT. The DS is too big for my wrist and the face is too noisy with text.

vukotab · 5 April 2008, 09:06 AM

Neither of them!I`m traditionalist,I would go for DD or good ol` Sub!

andrewls24 · 9 May 2008, 04:47 AM

Its been about a month, and in a close contest, the winner is the GMT- IIC!!!

SPACE-DWELLER · 9 May 2008, 04:48 AM

I've had the SS GMT IIc.

Going for the DSSD.

warrenmich · 9 May 2008, 04:50 AM

Take off the GAUDY writing and I may change my mind but for now it is the watch that I own and love!

Alex Collector · 9 May 2008, 06:43 AM

Better get the Deep Sea.

Alex

BigHat · 9 May 2008, 07:50 AM

GMT-IIC. Much more useful and attractive watch. Of course, one would have to see the SDDS in the flesh to be sure but based on the pics thus far...

rob · 9 May 2008, 01:05 PM

6 3/4" wrist here, I like the look of the dssd but it would be to massive on me!

pwrslider · 9 May 2008, 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

Neither!! Give me the new DD-II.....what a knock-out!!

X2!! Yeah Baaaaaby!

Magik · 9 May 2008, 02:25 PM

Deep Sea Sea Dweller. No hesitation

.

bwalkerVintage · 9 May 2008, 02:36 PM

Considering I already have a GMT, I'll take the Deep Sea.

wristworks · 10 May 2008, 12:48 AM

GMTII-c is a great watch but not as great as a SeaDweller DeepSea

SeaDweller1220 · 10 May 2008, 02:56 AM

Deep Sea for me!!!!
A watch that can tell time and is big enough to be a lethal weapon.

The DSSD is so tough it looked at Chuck Norris and made him cry!!!

View Poll Results: Which would you rather have?
SS GMT II C	112	55.72%
Deep Sea SD	89	44.28%
Voters: 201. You may not vote on this poll

5 April 2008, 03:37 AM	#33
Terry Newton "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Terry Newton Location: Michigan Watch: Rolex TT GMT II c Posts: 6,644	I have the TT GMT-Master IIc now and am very content with it. I also have an SS Date Sub for sport. I am an old man and wear old man watches. I'm satisfied with sticking with what I have. Terry Newton __________________ Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth "Z" SS Date Submariner "Z" TT GMT-Master IIc

5 April 2008, 09:06 AM	#46
vukotab "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Real Name: Vukota Brajovi Location: Belgrade,Serbia Watch: ing movies! Posts: 3,812	Neither of them!I`m traditionalist,I would go for DD or good ol` Sub! __________________ My fashion blog and Instagram: https://stylebyvukota.com/ https://instagram.com/vukotabrajovic/

9 May 2008, 04:47 AM	#47
andrewls24 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Andrew Location: Bethesda, MD Watch: SS Daytona Posts: 79	And the winner is.... Its been about a month, and in a close contest, the winner is the GMT- IIC!!! __________________ ------------------ SS Daytona - Black, SS Ceramic Daytona - White SS GMT IIc, Panerai - PAM 90, Ceramic Bluesy, SS Subc

9 May 2008, 04:48 AM	#48
SPACE-DWELLER "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Real Name: Bo Location: Denmark Watch: Rolex, of course! Posts: 22,436	I've had the SS GMT IIc. Going for the DSSD. __________________ With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...

5 April 2008, 03:15 AM	#31
Jimbits76 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: UK Posts: 9,407	Dipsy!!!!! J

5 April 2008, 03:27 AM	#32
watchboy "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Real Name: Jacky Location: Watch World Posts: 244	Well I think they cannot be compared. It depends on what one's needs. It one travels often, then the GMT is for him. If one dives often, then the GMT is not appropriate for him, so naturally the new SD is a the right choice. I think a fairer comparison will be the new Sub vs the new SD. For me I did not vote, cos I want them BOTH!!!!!!

5 April 2008, 03:38 AM	#34
Woody "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Africa Posts: 1,127	I am not impressed with the picturs of the DS that I have seen - perhps it will look better in the flesh but to my eyes the design package is rather OTT - the GMT11-C is a great watch and one I have enjoyed wearing for the last 9 months so that gets my vote. If I wanted a dive watch I would buy the standard Sub - great design and available at about half the price of the new DS.

5 April 2008, 03:49 AM	#36
Phew "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Netherlands Watch: GMT II Posts: 12	Deepsea for me. It would be a difficult one if the Pepsi was there!

5 April 2008, 03:51 AM	#37
rob 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Northern Ca. Watch: SS only Posts: 865	for the price GMT II-C, for fun dssd.

5 April 2008, 04:09 AM	#38
DJF881 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: New York Posts: 248	I paid the old price for the GMTIIc in SS, and I am not ready to pay $9000 for a watch. Also, I wear a suit to work, and I think the Deap Sea is too big to be appropriate for work. However, I think it's a gorgeous watch, a huge improvement on the old SD which I think was just a slight variant on the Sub. I want one.

5 April 2008, 05:14 AM	#39
TheDude "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: DC Area, USA Watch: IIc,1680 Red,16660 Posts: 4,492	Remove the garish black "ring" lettering reminding us of the features and I'd be a lot more interested in an SDDS.

5 April 2008, 06:20 AM	#40
PhilM "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Phil Location: London Watch: Sea-Dweller Posts: 1,765	Voted for the GMT, as I've already got the only SD that I want

5 April 2008, 06:26 AM	#43
Dave Kopf Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: NoVa Posts: 91	GMT IIc. I'm a small guy and about the only thing I could do with the SDDS is wear it around my waist (or hold it over my head?) and tell everyone I'm the WWF flyweight champion.

5 April 2008, 06:27 AM	#44
Brandonsan Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Brandon Squibb Location: Maryland Posts: 18	I prefer the GMT 2

5 April 2008, 07:29 AM	#45
arthur_daily "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: UK Watch: 16610LV sub Posts: 109	It would be the GMT. The DS is too big for my wrist and the face is too noisy with text.

9 May 2008, 04:50 AM	#49
warrenmich "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Michigan Watch: Rolex GMTII C Posts: 322	GMTIIc Take off the GAUDY writing and I may change my mind but for now it is the watch that I own and love! __________________ Longines Master Collection Chrono Rolex GMTIIc SS

9 May 2008, 06:43 AM	#50
Alex Collector 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: San Francisco, Ca Posts: 11,819	Better get the Deep Sea. Alex

9 May 2008, 07:50 AM	#51
BigHat Banned Join Date: Sep 2007 Real Name: Matt Location: Arlington, VA Watch: Lange One MP Posts: 4,043	GMT-IIC. Much more useful and attractive watch. Of course, one would have to see the SDDS in the flesh to be sure but based on the pics thus far...

9 May 2008, 01:05 PM	#52
rob 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Northern Ca. Watch: SS only Posts: 865	6 3/4" wrist here, I like the look of the dssd but it would be to massive on me!

9 May 2008, 02:25 PM	#54
Magik Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Real Name: Patrick Location: Royal Kunia, HI Watch: Sub-Date & GMT ll Posts: 603	Deep Sea Sea Dweller. No hesitation.

9 May 2008, 02:36 PM	#55
bwalkerVintage Banned Join Date: Feb 2007 Real Name: Brendan Location: Cougar Country Posts: 825	Considering I already have a GMT, I'll take the Deep Sea.

10 May 2008, 12:48 AM	#56
wristworks Banned Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: GB Posts: 220	GMTII-c is a great watch but not as great as a SeaDweller DeepSea

10 May 2008, 02:56 AM	#57
SeaDweller1220 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Morten Location: Delaware Watch: SD, Daytona, GMT-C Posts: 273	Deep Sea for me!!!! A watch that can tell time and is big enough to be a lethal weapon. The DSSD is so tough it looked at Chuck Norris and made him cry!!!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)