ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
4 June 2015, 04:14 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: norcal
Posts: 151
|
I want. Even though I'm average <+1 sec /day on my 3135, the casebacks aren't getting clearer, and more power reserve could mean less time on the wrist.... I want. Such a ridiculous passion of ours.
|
10 June 2015, 02:10 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Dallas
Posts: 143
|
What's VERY interesting to me at least, is that Rolex is introducing a new caliber and going DOWN in case size, while Omega significantly increased case size for their new calibers. This is a win to me for Rolex.
|
10 June 2015, 02:28 AM | #33 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 879
|
Quote:
When the 8500 came out, what made it such a big deal was that it was the first in-house Omega movement in decades, and the first mass-produced movement built around the Co-Axial escapement. (Yes the Omega 2500 calibre featured the escapement, but it was a modified 2892.) The bizarre thing is that Omega's new in-house movements are not only technically advanced, but slimmer than Rolex movements– yet they've been almost exclusively placed in massively thick cases. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.