ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
27 June 2015, 06:31 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: California
Posts: 131
|
Radiation test... '55 Sub with radium and original dial
1955 Sub with radium plots. Hands were replaced in 1976. Nothing glows at night except the lumos on the second hand.
Bought a $150 Geiger counter off Amazon. Tests: - Directly on crystal - 1.75 - 2.25 µSv/h - 2-3 inches from crystal - 0.81 µSv/h - 4-5 inches from crystal - 0.50 µSv/h - Directly on caseback - 0.83 µSv/h |
27 June 2015, 09:06 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: California
Posts: 131
|
Whoops!!!
I tested the watch wrong... you apparently don't use the black hole input looking thing at the top of the unit, you place the item below the unit and test it there (instructions pretty unclear...) Much higher values than expected: - Directly on crystal - >9.99 µSv/h - 1 inch from crystal - >9.99 µSv/h - 2 inches from crystal - 8.40 µSv/h - 3 inches from crystal - 5.20 µSv/h - 4 inches from crystal - 4.80 µSv/h - 12 inches from crystal - 0.60 µSv/h - Directly on caseback - 5.40 µSv/h |
27 June 2015, 09:44 AM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: RedSox Nation
Watch: U Talkn Bout Wilis
Posts: 5,503
|
Yes, there is a geiger tube in the detector that you are supposed to place over 1 inch or so from what you are measuring (it is in the manual).
__________________
I'm a sailor peg. And I've lost my leg. Climbing up the top sails. I've lost my leg! |
27 June 2015, 10:45 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Rich
Location: NC
Watch: Rolex 1675
Posts: 2,359
|
What do these readings mean?
__________________
Rich Member of Nylon Nation Red Sox Nation Instagram watchguy97 |
27 June 2015, 10:50 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: California
Posts: 131
|
Well, that basically the radium is still emitting radiation. It does have a half life of like 1200 years so it will continue to do so for a long time.
There is a chart for exposure and it turns out that in the grand scheme of things, wearing a watch putting out 5-10 µSv/h for 4-5 hours at a time is equivalent to the radiation exposure from a flight from NYC to LA. So not much, but more than zero. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sievert |
27 June 2015, 11:10 AM | #6 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: RedSox Nation
Watch: U Talkn Bout Wilis
Posts: 5,503
|
__________________
I'm a sailor peg. And I've lost my leg. Climbing up the top sails. I've lost my leg! |
27 June 2015, 11:15 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NYC / Milan
Watch: 6263
Posts: 3,938
|
very interesting chart, thanks for posting!
|
27 June 2015, 11:31 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,058
|
Assorted tests have shown that if you wear a Radium dial watch for about 12 hours a day all year (as many people of course did) then you would receive about 3 millisieverts radiation per year from the watch. Will try to find links to post.
Edit - numbers a bit different but this is the article I was thinking of. It's a good one I reckon. http://www.iwcforum.com/Articles/Lum...itaryDials.pdf |
27 June 2015, 12:17 PM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Q
Location: The Q Continuum
Watch: ST:TNG
Posts: 8,466
|
Quote:
At least that is what my 1956 6538 puts out. My 1953 Blancpain Fifty Fathoms puts out over 120 µSv/h...
__________________
Instagram: _queuecumber_ |
|
27 June 2015, 12:22 PM | #10 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: RedSox Nation
Watch: U Talkn Bout Wilis
Posts: 5,503
|
Photo is now needed, please
__________________
I'm a sailor peg. And I've lost my leg. Climbing up the top sails. I've lost my leg! |
27 June 2015, 12:24 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Q
Location: The Q Continuum
Watch: ST:TNG
Posts: 8,466
|
There is a video somewhere on my IG.
Unfortunately, I never uploaded it to flickr and I erased it from my phone, so it's only on my IG.
__________________
Instagram: _queuecumber_ |
27 June 2015, 12:30 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Q
Location: The Q Continuum
Watch: ST:TNG
Posts: 8,466
|
Found the videos on IG.
Here is the 1956 Rolex 6538: https://instagram.com/p/2HFZqVjUOH/?...=_queuecumber_
__________________
Instagram: _queuecumber_ |
27 June 2015, 12:31 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Q
Location: The Q Continuum
Watch: ST:TNG
Posts: 8,466
|
I was incorrect. The Blancpain measured at 223 µSv/h:
https://instagram.com/p/2EBi6zDUDx/?...=_queuecumber_ The device is measuring in millirems and converting to µSv is done by simply multiplying the number by 10. Needless to say, that is one f***in' hot watch....
__________________
Instagram: _queuecumber_ |
27 June 2015, 12:55 PM | #14 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 731
|
Of course this thread caught my attention due to my radium lume 6205...I'm not getting much radiation exposure these days due to the relative "safe queen" status of this one in my modest collection.
A "hot f***in watch" nonetheless |
28 June 2015, 12:34 AM | #15 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: RedSox Nation
Watch: U Talkn Bout Wilis
Posts: 5,503
|
Quote:
__________________
I'm a sailor peg. And I've lost my leg. Climbing up the top sails. I've lost my leg! |
|
28 June 2015, 05:30 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: California
Posts: 131
|
Queue can you test the backside/case side of the watch? I read that the case should dismiss about 2/3 of the radiation.
I am reading 5 microsieverts/hr on the case side, which would suggeset my max reading on the dial side would be about 15. Of course my counter only goes to 10 before limiting. But wondering what your case side reading would be... |
28 June 2015, 06:16 AM | #17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Q
Location: The Q Continuum
Watch: ST:TNG
Posts: 8,466
|
Quote:
__________________
Instagram: _queuecumber_ |
|
28 June 2015, 09:38 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: California
Posts: 131
|
No problem
Guess you don't remember the case back reading? |
28 June 2015, 10:09 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Q
Location: The Q Continuum
Watch: ST:TNG
Posts: 8,466
|
I didn't take one...
__________________
Instagram: _queuecumber_ |
4 July 2015, 02:37 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Denmark
Watch: Sea-Dweller 4000
Posts: 589
|
Very interesting thread!
What is the halftime of Tritium? I can't live with taking ant radiation risks, so I am very eager to learn about radiation from say an old 16660 circa 1984. Happy 4th July - via iPhone |
4 July 2015, 11:32 PM | #21 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Home!
Posts: 1,259
|
Quote:
Tritium half life is around 12 years. Your watch is 30 years old so the activity had dropped to less than a quarter of original. It is a low energy beta particle emitter, really nothing to worry about - whether brand new or a few decades old. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
5 July 2015, 02:20 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: California
Posts: 131
|
Queue, you were right, I got a different Geiger counter (actually same one you have) and it reads 50-80 microseverts/hr at the watch face.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.