The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 27 May 2008, 05:49 AM   #1
crombie
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 246
Locking Bracelet

What year did Rolex move to the locking bracelet? I'm referring to the style that has been on the sports models for at least the past 10 years.

greg
crombie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2008, 06:10 AM   #2
SPACE-DWELLER
"TRF" Member
 
SPACE-DWELLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
The "Fliplock" on the Submariners has been there for a LONG time.

Even the 1960ies Sub bracelet ref. 9315 with folded links had the Fliplock, so you're looking a about 50 years.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo

LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...
SPACE-DWELLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2008, 06:26 AM   #3
crombie
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 246
Sorry I wasn't clearer, but I believe the name of the buckle that I am referring to is the "oyster lock"(?),
thanks,
greg
crombie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2008, 06:48 AM   #4
SPACE-DWELLER
"TRF" Member
 
SPACE-DWELLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
Ah, okay.

Well, the OysterLock was introduced on the "Zenith" Daytonas when the bracelets when from all matte to the shiny centre links in late 1991, early 1992. The YM was introduced in 1992, also having the OysterLock.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo

LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...
SPACE-DWELLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2008, 07:00 AM   #5
crombie
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 246
Were other Rolex models introduced with the Oyster Lock around the same time (1992+)?

Out of curiousity, is it your preference?
greg
crombie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2008, 07:48 AM   #6
AOTM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: usa
Posts: 122
Quote:
Originally Posted by SPACE-DWELLER View Post
Ah, okay.

Well, the OysterLock was introduced on the "Zenith" Daytonas when the bracelets when from all matte to the shiny centre links in late 1991, early 1992. The YM was introduced in 1992, also having the OysterLock.
You are such a student of Rolex. How do you know so much?
AOTM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2008, 08:08 AM   #7
SPACE-DWELLER
"TRF" Member
 
SPACE-DWELLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
First of all, I might be wrong. It's not easy to pin-point years of introduction of such small changes. Secondly, I have learned a lot by other members here, by 20 years of experience with Rolex watches and by reading books.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo

LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...
SPACE-DWELLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2008, 09:02 AM   #8
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
The oysterlock seems to have made it's apperance on the EXP and GMT around the late U series--97-98.
mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2008, 09:10 AM   #9
SPACE-DWELLER
"TRF" Member
 
SPACE-DWELLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by crombie View Post
Sorry I wasn't clearer, but I believe the name of the buckle that I am referring to is the "oyster lock"(?),
thanks,
greg
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike View Post
The oysterlock seems to have made it's apperance on the EXP and GMT around the late U series--97-98.
Yes, the FlipLock did.

The OysterLock is different, though, having the Rolex coronet on the fold-over buckle itself.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo

LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...
SPACE-DWELLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2008, 09:55 AM   #10
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
Quote:
Originally Posted by SPACE-DWELLER View Post
Yes, the FlipLock did.

The OysterLock is different, though, having the Rolex coronet on the fold-over buckle itself.
The oysterlock is the smaller of the two locking clasps, used on the GMT and EXP. The fliplock is used on the Divers watches and of course has the extension.
mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2008, 09:58 AM   #11
SPACE-DWELLER
"TRF" Member
 
SPACE-DWELLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
Yup, it is shorter.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo

LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...
SPACE-DWELLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.