ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
18 November 2015, 08:29 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: John
Location: North Carolina
Watch: 1953 pre explorer
Posts: 2,758
|
Submariner School
Someone please take me to sub school. I am looking for my first sub and have always thought it a nice idea to get a birth year no date (85). That said i am not opposed to other years so far as I know so everyone give me the low down on various references. I don't want the date and I want SS (my budget won't all PM and I hate TT)
Thanks in advance!! |
18 November 2015, 08:39 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: GMT -7
Watch: GMT's & Sub's
Posts: 10,401
|
For a no date Sub from 1985 you should be able to find a nice 5513...and that's pretty much your option for a no date Sub from that era.
__________________
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin Member No. 922 |
18 November 2015, 10:05 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: philip
Location: missouri
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 1,094
|
IMO I would get a 14060M or new 114060 because you'd get newer or new works and luminova, plus a better bracelet.
|
18 November 2015, 10:17 AM | #4 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
5513 was the only Sub available in '85, and for the previous 20 years it was the 5513 or 5512. The 14060 replaced it in ~'89
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
18 November 2015, 10:35 AM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Josh
Location: Lost in time
Watch: Me Nae Nae
Posts: 9,823
|
Quote:
This. Take a look at both. They look, feel, and wear different but are as quality of Subs as you can get. Plus with a newer model you may save on service costs. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
"Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own." -Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter |
|
18 November 2015, 10:46 AM | #6 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,825
|
I would choose a mid-late 1980s 5513 over a 1990-onwards 14060. The 5513 contains a workhorse 1520 movement, and has that classic-looking plexi dome crystal. I bought one cheaply in poor condition (though the case was in great shape) and had it overhauled by Rolex with a new dial, hands, crown, etc, and it's a great daily wearer.
|
18 November 2015, 10:51 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Heath
Location: Elkton Ky
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 354
|
You should be able to find a good 14060 in the $3500 to $4000 price range. Great bang for the buck and easy to flip if need be. 5513 will cost you a little more money but give your classic look. Happy Hunting!
|
18 November 2015, 10:53 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Watch: 1991 14060 Sub
Posts: 498
|
I have an early '90s 14060 and I love it. A classic 2 line no-date sub. Can't beat it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
1991 14060 Submariner 1994 Tudor Big Block 1995 Rolex Explorer II 1992 Omega Speedmaster Pro |
18 November 2015, 11:25 AM | #9 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: not stil
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex n Omega
Posts: 1,327
|
Quote:
You'll also hear a lot of comments about newer movements being better. They probably are but older Subs are COSC and/ or COSC quality. Go for what sings to you...what sings to me are 14060 and prior Submariners. Older references are still great time pieces, work very well, are very accurate and have longevity if taken care of (as with anything mechanical), |
|
18 November 2015, 11:48 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: GMT -7
Watch: GMT's & Sub's
Posts: 10,401
|
The 5513 with the WG surrounds are not really sought after by many of the collectors so they can often be had for quite a bargain. I'd take a 5513 over a 14060 any time. Once you wear a 5513 you will understand what I mean.
Scott
__________________
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin Member No. 922 |
18 November 2015, 11:49 AM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sin City
Posts: 391
|
Quote:
http://www.netc.navy.mil/centers/slc/nss/ |
|
18 November 2015, 12:06 PM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: John
Location: North Carolina
Watch: 1953 pre explorer
Posts: 2,758
|
Quote:
I always liked the sub and the Breitling navitimer. I have decided the sub comes first as I will wear it more. The navitimer I feel is too big for my wrist but I love it none the less so I will get one one day since I have my other childhood favorites. Thanks all for the responses and keep them coming. Adam, I love your advice but I think that having one refurbished is a bit out of my budget as I am still a poor 30 yr old. |
|
18 November 2015, 12:10 PM | #14 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,825
|
Quote:
|
|
18 November 2015, 12:20 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: John
Location: North Carolina
Watch: 1953 pre explorer
Posts: 2,758
|
I will have to look into it. Hoping to find before Christmas as it will be my present to me.
|
18 November 2015, 03:02 PM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: philip
Location: missouri
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 1,094
|
Quote:
God bless them all. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.