The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 6 February 2016, 03:14 AM   #1
chino0823
"TRF" Member
 
chino0823's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: ct
Posts: 189
OK guys need your opinion

OK guys looking into my second rolex. Looking for a pre own rolex. But can't decide between a sub, sea dweller or gmt Pepsi bezel. I have to spend 5000 to 7000 to spend. Love all 3 but always around water so I think gmt I's not a great pick. What's your opaion and why. And what should I look for? Am a proud owner of a gmt 16753
chino0823 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 February 2016, 03:32 AM   #2
droptopman
"TRF" Member
 
droptopman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Mark
Location: Washington State
Watch: SUBS and GMT's!
Posts: 9,664
I wear my vintage watches all the time and for most activities, but I must admit I am a little leery of wearing my four digit pieces in the water. Even though both current pieces have been pressure tested I still would not dive with one. I have swam in a 5513 and a 1675 but rarely would anymore. I have 5 digit references that I feel more comfortable doing that activity in.

Maybe a 5 digit Submariner or Sea Dweller with sapphire. They can be found in great condition and generally much less cost than the 4 digit models.

If you love dome plexis and plan to stick to a 4 digit reference then probably an SD.
droptopman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 February 2016, 03:56 AM   #3
JJL
"TRF" Member
 
JJL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: US
Watch: 1680 Red & 16622
Posts: 2,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by chino0823 View Post
OK guys looking into my second rolex. Looking for a pre own rolex. But can't decide between a sub, sea dweller or gmt Pepsi bezel. I have to spend 5000 to 7000 to spend. Love all 3 but always around water so I think gmt I's not a great pick. What's your opaion and why. And what should I look for? Am a proud owner of a gmt 16753
If you already have a GMT, I'd go for the Sea Dweller personally. You can get a nice 16600 for that price range and the thing is a tank! Although I own a Sub (vintage 1680), I like the Sea-Dwellers more in general.

Also, I believe the GMT is waterproof up to 100 meters, so unless you're doing some serious diving, that should be plenty sufficient around the water.

Good luck
JJL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 February 2016, 04:39 AM   #4
chino0823
"TRF" Member
 
chino0823's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: ct
Posts: 189
Yes am leaning more to the SD. What is the big difference between the sub and SD. Spec etc.. just learning guys lol
chino0823 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 February 2016, 05:29 AM   #5
JJL
"TRF" Member
 
JJL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: US
Watch: 1680 Red & 16622
Posts: 2,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by chino0823 View Post
Yes am leaning more to the SD. What is the big difference between the sub and SD. Spec etc.. just learning guys lol
Depth rating
Helium Escape Valve
SD has no cyclops/date magnifier
case thickness (SD taller on the wrist)
SD wears a little heavier
I've also heard the SD wears 1mm smaller than the Sub although it's listed as 40mm

Hope that helps
JJL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2016, 01:51 AM   #6
swish77
2024 Pledge Member
 
swish77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,999
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJL View Post
Depth rating
Helium Escape Valve
SD has no cyclops/date magnifier
case thickness (SD taller on the wrist)
SD wears a little heavier
I've also heard the SD wears 1mm smaller than the Sub although it's listed as 40mm

Hope that helps
The SD indeed wears a tad smaller to the eye when looking down at the dial, but the heft, height, weight and overall thickness gives it a bigger feel on the wrist, IMHO. I own both and prefer the SD because of its wrist presence. I'm referring to the sapphire versions, which can still be "vintage" in my book, if they're from the '80s-early'90s. Vintage 5513 vs. 1665 is a completely different story. Good luck in your search!
swish77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.