ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

cr1ckett · 24 June 2008, 02:12 AM

The classic range of Rolexs look impressive but i think lack the status a 40mm size would give them. The Subby and GMT master are 40mm and look bloody stunning. Managed to purchased a SS GMT II (Ceremic) and i must say, its a truly handsome time piece.

Does the forum think that its time Rolex modernises the classic range and make them larger.

scottschoe · 24 June 2008, 02:14 AM

41MM would be ideal, 42 on the border. Anything bigger wouldn't do it for me. I don't think they should be making <38MM for men in the future.

GMTII Owner · 24 June 2008, 03:22 AM

For me, the 40 mm is perfect for my wrist and as large as I could go. I could see the need for the larger size depending on the size of the wrist... for example, the DSSD.

John

CPTL · 24 June 2008, 03:25 AM

I think my 36mm DJ is a great size for a dress watch. If I want something larger (sportier), then I wear my sporty watches (Exp-II; Sub). The DJ is strictly for wear under the cuff of a dress shirt, and anything larger would be too much, IMO.

pessoa00 · 24 June 2008, 03:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cr1ckett

The classic range of Rolexs look impressive but i think lack the status a 40mm size would give them. The Subby and GMT master are 40mm and look bloody stunning. Managed to purchased a SS GMT II (Ceremic) and i must say, its a truly handsome time piece.

Does the forum think that its time Rolex modernises the classic range and make them larger.

I think they are already increasing the size of their watches at a good pace. Look at the milgausses, the Deep Sea and the new DD at 41mm (looks great on pics). I would say that in a few years the datejust will sure follow.

JJ Irani · 24 June 2008, 04:05 AM

40 mm is well balanced and spot-on for virtually most wrists. Anything bigger would be acceptable only to a few - NOT most!! And that would be Rolex's primary concern.

JJ

SPACE-DWELLER · 24 June 2008, 04:22 AM

I've tried 43 mm watches and don't think they look too big on me. However, in the world of sport's watches, 40 mm has been the standard for a long time and looks good on pretty much any wrist, imho.

WatchTimes · 24 June 2008, 04:49 AM

SD, how big is your wrist?

cr1ckett · 25 June 2008, 01:56 AM

Does everybody think that other classic ranges could benefit from a slight size increase to 40mm (ie. Day Date, Datejust etc)?

cr1ckett · 27 June 2008, 01:33 AM

Does everybody think that other classic ranges could benefit from a slight size increase to 40mm (ie. Day Date, Datejust etc)?

astcell · 27 June 2008, 01:40 AM

The day date at 40mm will be nice!

CPTL · 27 June 2008, 02:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cr1ckett

Does everybody think that other classic ranges could benefit from a slight size increase to 40mm (ie. Day Date, Datejust etc)?

No--I think they're perfect at 36mm. Luckily for all of us, it appears that Rolex will release super-sized versions of the DD and DJ, while continuing to offer the classic models in 36mm.

Quote:

Originally Posted by astcell

The day date at 40mm will be nice!

Are you kidding?? Any guess as to how much that thing will weigh in solid gold?

WatchTimes · 27 June 2008, 03:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CPTL

No--I think they're perfect at 36mm. Luckily for all of us, it appears that Rolex will release super-sized versions of the DD and DJ, while continuing to offer the classic models in 36mm.

Are you kidding?? Any guess as to how much that thing will weigh in solid gold?

I doubt anymore than the YM II in WG

cr1ckett · 28 June 2008, 01:23 AM

I honestly think its only a matter of time before 40mm is standard across the board and Rolex needs to keep up. 36mm looks small on most wrists.

Trurolexer · 28 June 2008, 01:52 AM

40mm is PERFECT!!!

SPACE-DWELLER · 28 June 2008, 02:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JYogi

SD, how big is your wrist?

My wrist is 7 ½ ".

cody p · 28 June 2008, 02:17 AM

in my opinion it's the smaller sizes that makes 'em classics. but i guess for guys with larger wrists, larger case sizes would be/are a good option. just keep making the smaller case sizes as well... i hope.

24 June 2008, 02:12 AM	#1
cr1ckett Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: London Posts: 123	Attention : 40mm Classic Range The classic range of Rolexs look impressive but i think lack the status a 40mm size would give them. The Subby and GMT master are 40mm and look bloody stunning. Managed to purchased a SS GMT II (Ceremic) and i must say, its a truly handsome time piece. Does the forum think that its time Rolex modernises the classic range and make them larger.

24 June 2008, 02:14 AM	#2
scottschoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: CA Posts: 3,295	41MM would be ideal, 42 on the border. Anything bigger wouldn't do it for me. I don't think they should be making <38MM for men in the future. __________________ __________________

24 June 2008, 03:22 AM	#3
GMTII Owner "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: John Location: Nashville, TN Watch: S/S GMT Master IIc Posts: 1,210	For me, the 40 mm is perfect for my wrist and as large as I could go. I could see the need for the larger size depending on the size of the wrist... for example, the DSSD. John __________________

24 June 2008, 03:25 AM	#4
CPTL "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Kevin Location: Texas on my mind Watch: Sub Date; SS/WG DJ Posts: 2,445	I think my 36mm DJ is a great size for a dress watch. If I want something larger (sportier), then I wear my sporty watches (Exp-II; Sub). The DJ is strictly for wear under the cuff of a dress shirt, and anything larger would be too much, IMO. __________________ 16610 Submariner Date; D Serial 16234 DateJust SS with WG Fluted Bezel & Jubillee, White Roman Dial; F Serial 16570 Explorer II White Dial; M Serial And Hers: 78240 Mid-Size DateJust SS with Domed Bezel & Oyster, White Roman; D Serial

24 June 2008, 04:05 AM	#6
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,319	40 mm is well balanced and spot-on for virtually most wrists. Anything bigger would be acceptable only to a few - NOT most!! And that would be Rolex's primary concern. JJ __________________ Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!

24 June 2008, 04:22 AM	#7
SPACE-DWELLER "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Real Name: Bo Location: Denmark Watch: Rolex, of course! Posts: 22,436	I've tried 43 mm watches and don't think they look too big on me. However, in the world of sport's watches, 40 mm has been the standard for a long time and looks good on pretty much any wrist, imho. __________________ With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...

24 June 2008, 04:49 AM	#8
WatchTimes 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Real Name: JYogi/Jeremy Location: Metro Detroit USA Watch: It's a Rolex! Posts: 5,787	SD, how big is your wrist?

25 June 2008, 01:56 AM	#9
cr1ckett Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: London Posts: 123	Does everybody think that other classic ranges could benefit from a slight size increase to 40mm (ie. Day Date, Datejust etc)?

27 June 2008, 01:33 AM	#10
cr1ckett Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: London Posts: 123	Does everybody think that other classic ranges could benefit from a slight size increase to 40mm (ie. Day Date, Datejust etc)?

27 June 2008, 01:40 AM	#11
astcell "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Real Name: Robert Location: Angelus Oaks, CA Watch: 116713 Posts: 6,828	The day date at 40mm will be nice!

28 June 2008, 01:23 AM	#14
cr1ckett Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: London Posts: 123	I honestly think its only a matter of time before 40mm is standard across the board and Rolex needs to keep up. 36mm looks small on most wrists.

28 June 2008, 01:52 AM	#15
Trurolexer Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: USA Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex Posts: 18,421	40mm is PERFECT!!!

28 June 2008, 02:17 AM	#17
cody p "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Canada Watch: Air-King 114200 Posts: 2,878	in my opinion it's the smaller sizes that makes 'em classics. but i guess for guys with larger wrists, larger case sizes would be/are a good option. just keep making the smaller case sizes as well... i hope.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)