The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18 February 2016, 09:27 AM   #61
WhatTheDeuce
"TRF" Member
 
WhatTheDeuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Kyung
Location: Anywhere?
Watch: cha want...
Posts: 4,488
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wcdhtwn View Post
Does the Portugieser Chrono still have the modified ETA? The one I have does but I got it 12 years ago. I thought they replaced it with an in house movement. Calibre 79350 on their Website, I suppose that could be an ETA...



OP: I'd say Sub and the lume is probably the biggest reason. But if you are set on an IWC I'd suggest the Yacht Club Chronograph. That's closer to the Sub in the Portugieser family. Though the Aquatimer line is their version of dive watches so from a diving tool perspective you should be shopping there.

Still ETA but the Chronograph Classic has an in-house movement.


Sent from half way through the Kessel Run using Tapatalk
__________________
Instagram: @whatthedeuce_
WhatTheDeuce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 February 2016, 09:40 AM   #62
doc.kool
"TRF" Member
 
doc.kool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 610
Sub-C. There is no comparison here for a daily wearer. The IWC is a beauty but it doesn't compare with the Sub as an all rounder IMHO
doc.kool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 February 2016, 09:47 AM   #63
dera
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,372
As someone who would never wear a SS bracelet watch with a suit - IWC. Logic: I would wear a leather strap watch casually and with a suit, and I'd wear a SS bracelet watch casually, but not with a suit.
So, all-rounder, IWC.
dera is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 February 2016, 01:18 PM   #64
mschafer
"TRF" Member
 
mschafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 976
Good one. The sub is a bit more butch, the IWC clearly more refined. So I guess whatever your preference and daily requirement. For my life a bit more rugged is quite suitable, if my life would evolve around office and fine entertainment I would choose the IWC. But they both work in the or opposite worlds in a pinch. The obvious advice is a tough and a dress one, so you have a choice. In the meantime, choose the third way and get a Explorer.
mschafer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 February 2016, 10:34 AM   #65
lindstd
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 233
I just came across this Thread that I started 4yrs ago. How funny. It's a long winded sorry but I purchased the Rolex Sub C at first however it just never really sang to me. I am probably not on the same page as most but I felt as though it was too small for me. I wish it was 42mm in a perfect world. With that being said, I sold it after a few months and purchased the IWC. I absolutely love it and I have no regrets. I also own the Tudor Pelagos and I am in a delemma with my next purchase. I am deciding between the Omega 9300 Speedmaster or the Rolex Explorer 2. Thanks everyone for asking!
lindstd is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.