ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

CaputMortuum · 19 February 2016, 11:09 PM

With the help of other users here I found an AD which had a BLNR, a SudC Date and a Daytona in stock. Very pleased that I now had an opportunity to try them on, although now I'm more confused than ever.

I think Daytona looks pretty good but the SubC Date and GMT are a bit on the large side. What do you guys think?
My wrist is about 6" and pretty flat, just to inform others that may be troubled by the same thing.

Other pics to follow.

Easy Rhino · 19 February 2016, 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by airchitect

First off.....travel to a location to try them all on in one sitting. One or two will sing, the others will not.

I agree with this. Go to an authorized dealer with hundreds of Rolex's and try any and all of them on that grab your eye in the least, and narrow it down to a grouping that is manageable to you (2, 6, 12?). My retailer had at least a hundred on open display. I would do this early in the day, not last thing.

Then take the rest of the day off, and daydream about what you see on your wrist. Sleep on it, then make your decision. Think about whatever comes to mind, as those are your instincts coming to the fore. If it feels too expensive, small, ornate, whatever, it will surface during your daydreaming about it.

Most of all, enjoy the process. It's part of the fun.

Me, I knew what I wanted for a dozen years before I got my first. Now ten years later, I'm going to do the above process to pick my second (I need two heirloom watches, one for each son).

namussuz bilo · 19 February 2016, 11:17 PM

daytona looks good

CaputMortuum · 19 February 2016, 11:22 PM

SubC Date too big for me?

watchwatcher · 19 February 2016, 11:22 PM

Well...not to be the dissenting opinion, but...

It sounds like you don't know what you really want yet...and in my experience buying before you do would be a mistake. The availability (or non-availability) of the models you're looking at is of secondary concern. Focus in on what it is you need and want...take your time and enjoy the hunt.

CaputMortuum · 19 February 2016, 11:38 PM

Not exactly. I wanted SubC Date, then came the lust for GMT II BLNR but now I'm worried that neither will fit on my small wrist. Any opinion on that would be much appreciated.

CaputMortuum · 19 February 2016, 11:44 PM

And here is a pic of the GMT II BLNR. Is it too big for me?

rick101 · 19 February 2016, 11:46 PM

this

rick101 · 19 February 2016, 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaputMortuum

And here is a pic of the GMT II BLNR. Is it too big for me?

no its fine as long as the bezel doesnt overlap your wrist edges which yours dont

dunhill965 · 19 February 2016, 11:59 PM

They all look great on your wrist. I second the opinion to not let availability influence you. Trust your gut and pick the one that will make you smile the most.

I just added a BLNR after waiting and could not be more happy. After seeing one in the flesh I knew it was the one.

IMHO if you're looking for one watch to do it all I would suggest that or a white dial Daytona.

AlexMachine · 20 February 2016, 12:00 AM

All seem to sitting quite nice and not too big.

dera · 20 February 2016, 12:09 AM

They all look great. Choose quick though, they sell them quick. This AD has them in stock once a month. Did you try on the Polar exp2? (They have one in stock but it is reserved. Might know who to... :) )

JRT · 20 February 2016, 02:43 AM

All 3 watches can fit your wrist well from the picture shown. But I vote for the BLNR, which has the best looking and more functions for you.

antbkny · 20 February 2016, 03:00 AM

sub looks best!

Etschell · 20 February 2016, 03:06 AM

6 inch wrist? nope. your wrist is closer to 6.75 or 7 inches.

id go with the subc.

Galion · 20 February 2016, 03:13 AM

If I had your wrist size, I'd go with the Subc date as my one and only Rolex.

Arclight · 20 February 2016, 03:20 AM

Find a clean 14060M and don't look back! If you need the date look at your phone.

CaputMortuum · 20 February 2016, 03:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Etschell

6 inch wrist? nope. your wrist is closer to 6.75 or 7 inches.

id go with the subc.

Doh, I just checked and my wrist and it is 6,7". Damn, I feel stupid now. We use the metric system, so that's my defence. Maybe I could pull 'em off, then.

AlexMachine · 20 February 2016, 03:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaputMortuum

Doh, I just checked and my wrist and it is 6,7". Damn, I feel stupid now. We use the metric system, so that's my defence. Maybe I could pull 'em off, then.

Of cource every wrist is different. Mine is about same as yours. But I think it is the shape that makes the difference. Mine is flat and wide, others might have round etc. So I think you have any of them with no problem.
Wait, try, and take the one that really sings to you and feels "right".

ILuvSubs · 20 February 2016, 08:06 AM

All three look great on your wrist and not oversized at all. Personally, I think the BLNR looks particularly good on your wrist (and that's coming from someone who loves Subs!).

Good luck in choosing! Any of those three would be a fantastic choice

lak · 20 February 2016, 06:35 PM

BLNR looks best on you!!

HogwldFLTR · 20 February 2016, 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaputMortuum

With the help of other users here I found an AD which had a BLNR, a SudC Date and a Daytona in stock. Very pleased that I now had an opportunity to try them on, although now I'm more confused than ever.

I think Daytona looks pretty good but the SubC Date and GMT are a bit on the large side. What do you guys think?
My wrist is about 6" and pretty flat, just to inform others that may be troubled by the same thing.

Other pics to follow.

They all look great on you. I found the SubC (nd) too awkward feeling. The point being that looks shouldn't be the only determining factor. By which feels right to you. IMHO.

japenney · 20 February 2016, 07:12 PM

Daytona looks best by a country mile

Fed · 20 February 2016, 07:38 PM

Here's my personal preference from most favourite, Daytona, GMT, Sub. But if this is going to be your only Rolex for some time, I'd pick the Sub.

Boothroyd · 21 February 2016, 02:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack T

"I wanted a watch that could handle daily use for at least one lifetime and goes just as well with jeans and a t-shirt as it does with a suit. "

Based on the criteria you set, I don't see how you can not seriously consider an Explorer, 214270. It meets all your requirements, is discreet, versatile and durable. I have several watches, but the Explorer gets most of my wrist time, by far. I really like it. Jocke's pic

Have to second that opinion.

turboawd · 21 February 2016, 03:15 PM

Out of the three choices, if it were me and finances allowed it, I'd go for the Daytona (white dial if possible)

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

itsmekevin · 21 February 2016, 03:43 PM

From your pictures, I'd say Daytona.

Ravager135 · 21 February 2016, 06:13 PM

All of them look fine. The BLNR is probably the most versatile sport Rolex.

For me, the Daytona wears a bit too small. It's a classic no doubt, but I see it as a piece you add to a collection.

There is nothing wrong with the Submariner Date but everyone has one. Heck, it was my first Rolex.

Robbyman · 21 February 2016, 10:32 PM

Avoid the Sub maxi case.

The GMT BLNR has thinner lugs and you can tell it easily, fits my small wrist better.

I am getting SDc to replace my SubC. It looks much small on and I have worn a Breitling Superocean 42mm for ten years that is 15mm thick so not worried about the SDc as I like the presence.

daswann · 22 February 2016, 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MickCollins1916

I concur with these gents. SD4K is a gem. 👍

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

+1

19 February 2016, 11:09 PM	#61
CaputMortuum "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Location: Finland Posts: 110	With the help of other users here I found an AD which had a BLNR, a SudC Date and a Daytona in stock. Very pleased that I now had an opportunity to try them on, although now I'm more confused than ever. I think Daytona looks pretty good but the SubC Date and GMT are a bit on the large side. What do you guys think? My wrist is about 6" and pretty flat, just to inform others that may be troubled by the same thing. Other pics to follow. Attached Images

19 February 2016, 11:22 PM	#64
CaputMortuum "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Location: Finland Posts: 110	SubC Date too big for me? Attached Images

19 February 2016, 11:44 PM	#67
CaputMortuum "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Location: Finland Posts: 110	And here is a pic of the GMT II BLNR. Is it too big for me? Attached Images

19 February 2016, 11:46 PM	#68
rick101 Member Join Date: Jan 2016 Location: UK Posts: 442	this Attached Images

20 February 2016, 03:06 AM	#75
Etschell "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Location: FL Watch: platinum sub Posts: 15,884	6 inch wrist? nope. your wrist is closer to 6.75 or 7 inches. id go with the subc. __________________ If you wind it, they will run. 25 or 6 to 4.

19 February 2016, 11:17 PM	#63
namussuz bilo Banned Join Date: Apr 2014 Location: earth Posts: 794	daytona looks good

19 February 2016, 11:22 PM	#65
watchwatcher "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Larry Location: Kentucky Watch: Yes Posts: 35,044	Well...not to be the dissenting opinion, but... It sounds like you don't know what you really want yet...and in my experience buying before you do would be a mistake. The availability (or non-availability) of the models you're looking at is of secondary concern. Focus in on what it is you need and want...take your time and enjoy the hunt.

19 February 2016, 11:38 PM	#66
CaputMortuum "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Location: Finland Posts: 110	Not exactly. I wanted SubC Date, then came the lust for GMT II BLNR but now I'm worried that neither will fit on my small wrist. Any opinion on that would be much appreciated.

19 February 2016, 11:59 PM	#70
dunhill965 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2014 Real Name: J Location: Greater NYC area Watch: BLNR, Omega AT Posts: 36	They all look great on your wrist. I second the opinion to not let availability influence you. Trust your gut and pick the one that will make you smile the most. I just added a BLNR after waiting and could not be more happy. After seeing one in the flesh I knew it was the one. IMHO if you're looking for one watch to do it all I would suggest that or a white dial Daytona.

20 February 2016, 12:00 AM	#71
AlexMachine "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: Finland Posts: 277	All seem to sitting quite nice and not too big.

20 February 2016, 12:09 AM	#72
dera "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2015 Location: Dallas, TX Posts: 1,372	They all look great. Choose quick though, they sell them quick. This AD has them in stock once a month. Did you try on the Polar exp2? (They have one in stock but it is reserved. Might know who to... :) )

20 February 2016, 02:43 AM	#73
JRT "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2015 Location: Taiwan Watch: Rolex BLNR Posts: 2,308	All 3 watches can fit your wrist well from the picture shown. But I vote for the BLNR, which has the best looking and more functions for you.

20 February 2016, 03:00 AM	#74
antbkny "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Real Name: Anthony Location: Brooklyn, NY Watch: Dblue Posts: 6,723	sub looks best!

20 February 2016, 03:13 AM	#76
Galion "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Location: PE - BR Posts: 558	If I had your wrist size, I'd go with the Subc date as my one and only Rolex.

20 February 2016, 03:20 AM	#77
Arclight Banned Join Date: Mar 2013 Real Name: Rob Location: New York Watch: Rolex Posts: 577	Find a clean 14060M and don't look back! If you need the date look at your phone. Attached Images

20 February 2016, 08:06 AM	#80
ILuvSubs 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2015 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 1,011	All three look great on your wrist and not oversized at all. Personally, I think the BLNR looks particularly good on your wrist (and that's coming from someone who loves Subs!). Good luck in choosing! Any of those three would be a fantastic choice

20 February 2016, 06:35 PM	#81
lak "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2016 Real Name: Larry Location: Canada, Vancouver Watch: Rolex Daytona Posts: 37	BLNR looks best on you!!

20 February 2016, 07:12 PM	#83
japenney "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Real Name: Josh Location: Canada Watch: undecided Posts: 4,777	Daytona looks best by a country mile

20 February 2016, 07:38 PM	#84
Fed "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: Hong Kong Posts: 49	Here's my personal preference from most favourite, Daytona, GMT, Sub. But if this is going to be your only Rolex for some time, I'd pick the Sub.

21 February 2016, 03:15 PM	#86
turboawd "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2013 Location: Canada Posts: 208	Out of the three choices, if it were me and finances allowed it, I'd go for the Daytona (white dial if possible) Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

21 February 2016, 03:43 PM	#87
itsmekevin "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2015 Location: Orange County, CA Posts: 125	From your pictures, I'd say Daytona.

21 February 2016, 06:13 PM	#88
Ravager135 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: New Jersey Posts: 4,224	All of them look fine. The BLNR is probably the most versatile sport Rolex. For me, the Daytona wears a bit too small. It's a classic no doubt, but I see it as a piece you add to a collection. There is nothing wrong with the Submariner Date but everyone has one. Heck, it was my first Rolex.

21 February 2016, 10:32 PM	#89
Robbyman "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Location: Blighty (England) Watch: Daytona/Pepsi/Sub Posts: 1,517	Avoid the Sub maxi case. The GMT BLNR has thinner lugs and you can tell it easily, fits my small wrist better. I am getting SDc to replace my SubC. It looks much small on and I have worn a Breitling Superocean 42mm for ten years that is 15mm thick so not worried about the SDc as I like the presence.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)