ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

VinnieVegas · 5 March 2016, 09:32 AM

Guys,

Looking to expand my collection this year with at least one addition. I am pretty sure I will be adding a 14060 or 14060M at some point. The next question is should I go for the 16610 or the 16660?

Leaning towards the 16660. I think it's distinct enough from the other watches in my collection. And truth me told, the Submariner Date really doesn't grab me.

What do you think? Thanks!

sea-dweller · 5 March 2016, 10:15 AM

I picked the first option, everyone needs Subs in their collection!

MickCollins1916 · 5 March 2016, 02:59 PM

I have a both a 14060m and 16600. Plenty of room for them to coexist in a collection and I think they make a nice pair together.

I have pieces with the cyclops, but I prefer the ones without. I bought the sub BNIB as my first, and the salesperson tried to get me to try the SD at the time to compare.I refused but wish now I had seen the light back then.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ltmgeller · 5 March 2016, 03:03 PM

Sd

BNA/LION · 5 March 2016, 03:04 PM

14060/14060m & 16660

judodave1964 · 6 March 2016, 12:54 AM

This one.

daveswordfish · 6 March 2016, 01:09 AM

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

mikkemus23 · 6 March 2016, 01:34 AM

666

Chrispare · 6 March 2016, 03:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikkemus23

666

beautiful !
Mine says hi

PrinceT · 6 March 2016, 03:28 AM

Think the 14060m would be a nice collection. Most purists fancy the 2 liner sub but on the contrary i prefer the 4 liner cosc version. Not so much from a cosc point of view(honestly doesn't make much a diff) but simply because i feel it just looks more complete. I also like the rehaut engravings on it yet retaining its drilled lugs. They came out with just a few versions before the 114060 replaced them. the more common ones are the Z serial, V serial & the AN serials. You won't regret!

doramas · 6 March 2016, 03:37 AM

Explorer ll white

View Poll Results: What's my next step?
14060/14060M & 16610	7	21.21%
14060/14060M & 16660	18	54.55%
14060/14060M & Something Else	3	9.09%
Something Else Entirely	5	15.15%
Voters: 33. You may not vote on this poll

5 March 2016, 09:32 AM	#1
VinnieVegas "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2015 Real Name: Vincent B Location: New York, NY Watch: '06 GMT Master II Posts: 1,261	16610 or 16660? Guys, Looking to expand my collection this year with at least one addition. I am pretty sure I will be adding a 14060 or 14060M at some point. The next question is should I go for the 16610 or the 16660? Leaning towards the 16660. I think it's distinct enough from the other watches in my collection. And truth me told, the Submariner Date really doesn't grab me. What do you think? Thanks! __________________ Wearing Today: * Seiko SRP777 (2017)

5 March 2016, 10:15 AM	#2
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	I picked the first option, everyone needs Subs in their collection! __________________ TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007)

5 March 2016, 03:04 PM	#5
BNA/LION 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: Larry Location: San Diego, CA Watch: ROLEX Posts: 25,650	14060/14060m & 16660 __________________ ✦ 28238 President DD 18K/YG ✦ 16610LN SS Sub ✦ 16613 18K/SS Serti ✦ 16550 Exp II Non-Rail Cream Dial ✦ Daytona C 116500 ✦ 126710 BLRO GMT-Master II ✦ NEXT-->? ⛳ Hole In One! 10/3/19 DMCC 5th hole, par 3, 168 yards w/ 4-Iron.

6 March 2016, 12:54 AM	#6
judodave1964 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: Sussex Watch: seadweller 16600 Posts: 175	This one. Attached Images

5 March 2016, 02:59 PM	#3
MickCollins1916 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2014 Real Name: Bill Location: Baltimore, MD Watch: 116600 SD4K Posts: 3,282	I have a both a 14060m and 16600. Plenty of room for them to coexist in a collection and I think they make a nice pair together. I have pieces with the cyclops, but I prefer the ones without. I bought the sub BNIB as my first, and the salesperson tried to get me to try the SD at the time to compare.I refused but wish now I had seen the light back then. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

5 March 2016, 03:03 PM	#4
ltmgeller 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Real Name: Mike Location: New York Watch: Rolex Posts: 22,574	Sd

6 March 2016, 01:09 AM	#7
daveswordfish "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2014 Posts: 535	Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

6 March 2016, 01:34 AM	#8
mikkemus23 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: Eirik Location: Norway Watch: Rolex/Omega/PAM Posts: 1,160	666

6 March 2016, 03:28 AM	#10
PrinceT "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2015 Location: One Degree North Posts: 340	Think the 14060m would be a nice collection. Most purists fancy the 2 liner sub but on the contrary i prefer the 4 liner cosc version. Not so much from a cosc point of view(honestly doesn't make much a diff) but simply because i feel it just looks more complete. I also like the rehaut engravings on it yet retaining its drilled lugs. They came out with just a few versions before the 114060 replaced them. the more common ones are the Z serial, V serial & the AN serials. You won't regret!

6 March 2016, 03:37 AM	#11
doramas Banned Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: Gran Canaria Posts: 3,469	Explorer ll white

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)