ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

schwartz914 · 22 March 2016, 01:17 AM

Why did they not do the hidden clasp?

Annan · 22 March 2016, 01:21 AM

This is a disappointment for many. I'm guessing the reason was to allow the wearer to use the easylink to make adjustments.

schwartz914 · 22 March 2016, 01:26 AM

I agree. I think that is should have had the hidden clasp and the size should have been 40mm. That is something I would look forward to. It could be a blessing in disguise because I probably would have bought it lol

22 March 2016, 01:17 AM	#1
schwartz914 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Real Name: David Location: NY Watch: Rolex Posts: 917	41mm datejust 2016 Basel Why did they not do the hidden clasp?

22 March 2016, 01:21 AM	#2
Annan "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Real Name: Ron Location: Arizona, USA Watch: 116233 Posts: 3,180	This is a disappointment for many. I'm guessing the reason was to allow the wearer to use the easylink to make adjustments. __________________ *so many Rolexes.....so little time*

22 March 2016, 01:26 AM	#3
schwartz914 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Real Name: David Location: NY Watch: Rolex Posts: 917	I agree. I think that is should have had the hidden clasp and the size should have been 40mm. That is something I would look forward to. It could be a blessing in disguise because I probably would have bought it lol

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)