ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
2 January 2015, 05:51 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Jason
Location: San Francisco
Watch: 16610 / 16570
Posts: 276
|
Smart Watch Band for your Rolex?
http://www.engadget.com/2015/01/01/m...rap-watchband/
Looks like the best of both worlds! To be fair, I had a Galaxy Gear 2 for about a month and sold it as it was a bit cumbersome to charge daily. Plus the neglect my other timepieces received was a bit, well, |
6 May 2015, 10:15 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: Chris
Location: Toronto
Watch: 116263 LP TOG
Posts: 204
|
Very cool. Anyone seen this in the wild?
__________________
228239♕14060M♕1601♕116263 LP♕116234♕ Time is the most valuable thing that a man can spend. |
26 June 2015, 07:42 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,011
|
Interesting. Not for me, but, interesting.
|
11 February 2016, 12:14 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: prabhu
Location: singapore
Watch: ROLEX 116613LBD
Posts: 713
|
Awesome but i'm thinking desk diving will probably take a toll on that e-strap.. and would it like have possibilities to magnetise the mechanical watch..??
|
11 February 2016, 08:54 AM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,010
|
Very interesting to see the various ways that watchmakers are trying to deal with the threat of smart watches. Personally I still like my watches analog (even the straps).
|
17 February 2016, 11:47 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Glenn
Location: Chester
Watch: 114060
Posts: 92
|
Bit more info here:
https://www.wheelersluxurygifts.com/...FQoCwwodb-cA_A 250 GBP, seems ok as you get a MB strap too! |
27 March 2016, 04:04 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Gerald
Location: Okinawa
Watch: Seiko Black Monste
Posts: 123
|
More useless technology to spend your money on. You have a smart phone in your pocket and a perfectly good watch on your wrist. No need to integrate the two. They have existed in harmony, just fine by the way, for awhile now.
|
29 March 2016, 08:00 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Glenn
Location: Chester
Watch: 114060
Posts: 92
|
I quite agree. Anyway i'm not putting a non Rolex strap on my Sub!
|
31 March 2016, 10:58 AM | #9 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: Glocal
Posts: 21,083
|
As a tech developer / geek for years have been wearing two wrist instruments. As am right-handed the mechanical goes on the normal left wrist and on the right is (today) the latest Samsung Gear S2 Classic 4G on matching metal bracelet. The latest S2 looks like a proper watch, with the metal bracelet completing the look (stock leather strap didn't 'do it' for me visually). Unique is that it has full cell phone / messaging built in plus all the typical health and other bits so can leave the brick at home. For mechanical it was a Patek 5167 yet decided the new Sub was a better fit for my active lifestyle at the beach.
Am not sure we'll see a mechanical combined with 'computerized' for years until they can shrink down a proper imaging/touch overlay 'crystal' that offers good transparency. Add to that the typical size 'limitations' when we add in the mechanical and electrical power delivery bits. JMHO. YMMV. |
13 April 2016, 06:01 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1
|
I quite like my heart rate monitoring and step counting Fitbit. If someone could do those functions and not have them look absolutely shit I'd be interested.
https://wearchronos.com/ looks promising, but no heart rate monitor. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.