ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

gbear1969 · 14 May 2016, 12:25 AM

Thanks for the clarification Haywood Milton. I may have misunderstood the guy as it was a casual conversation in a watch shop, after he asked me about this watch. He may have said 16000 -with flat bezel- never had a linen dial. (When I briefly googled images of the 16000 and looked on chrono24 it seemed like there were fluted versions.). Anyway, now I know at least the bezel is correct! Still not clear on these denotations. Learning thanks to you and this forum. So Thanks !

But I have yet to see a picture of a 16000 with a linen dial so that part remains open. 1600 yes, but not 16000.

14 May 2016, 12:25 AM	#4
gbear1969 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2016 Real Name: Chris Location: Singapore Watch: 1016, 5513, 16750 Posts: 7	Thanks for the clarification Haywood Milton. I may have misunderstood the guy as it was a casual conversation in a watch shop, after he asked me about this watch. He may have said 16000 -with flat bezel- never had a linen dial. (When I briefly googled images of the 16000 and looked on chrono24 it seemed like there were fluted versions.). Anyway, now I know at least the bezel is correct! Still not clear on these denotations. Learning thanks to you and this forum. So Thanks ! But I have yet to see a picture of a 16000 with a linen dial so that part remains open. 1600 yes, but not 16000.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)