The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16 May 2016, 03:03 AM   #1
emanuah
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Emanuel
Location: Israel
Watch: 1680R,15400,16610
Posts: 452
Birth year 1680

Hi,

Please help me with this piece:
1. Is all look good?
2. What is a good price for it ( my dealer asking 7$)?
3. Any other input???

Tnx ahead

Emanuel
Attached Images
 
emanuah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2016, 03:06 AM   #2
emanuah
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Emanuel
Location: Israel
Watch: 1680R,15400,16610
Posts: 452
5.1 mil
1977
Without box or papers
emanuah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2016, 04:38 AM   #3
emanuah
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Emanuel
Location: Israel
Watch: 1680R,15400,16610
Posts: 452
Anything???
Plz
emanuah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2016, 07:15 AM   #4
mattedialdoc
"TRF" Member
 
mattedialdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,002
Can we have a few more pictures. That would help.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mattedialdoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2016, 12:05 PM   #5
emanuah
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Emanuel
Location: Israel
Watch: 1680R,15400,16610
Posts: 452
Sorry as I don't have any more pictures yet.

Emanuel
emanuah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2016, 12:16 PM   #6
el1125
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 3,578
All I see from that pic are scratches that I assume are on the plexi?
el1125 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2016, 02:01 PM   #7
emanuah
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Emanuel
Location: Israel
Watch: 1680R,15400,16610
Posts: 452
you are right

Quote:
Originally Posted by el1125 View Post
All I see from that pic are scratches that I assume are on the plexi?
all the scratches are on the plexi.

can you plz tell me which mk the dial?
does it belong to 5.1 mil serial?

emanuel
emanuah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2016, 06:56 PM   #8
emanuah
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Emanuel
Location: Israel
Watch: 1680R,15400,16610
Posts: 452
Some more pictures

Plz you're input...
Attached Images
 
emanuah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2016, 06:57 PM   #9
emanuah
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Emanuel
Location: Israel
Watch: 1680R,15400,16610
Posts: 452
And more

Tnx
Attached Images
 
emanuah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2016, 06:57 PM   #10
emanuah
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Emanuel
Location: Israel
Watch: 1680R,15400,16610
Posts: 452
One more

Emanuel
Attached Images
 

Last edited by emanuah; 16 May 2016 at 06:58 PM.. Reason: Adding picture
emanuah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2016, 07:00 PM   #11
emanuah
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Emanuel
Location: Israel
Watch: 1680R,15400,16610
Posts: 452
Last one indeed

Emanuel
Attached Images
 
emanuah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2016, 11:28 PM   #12
HERITAGE82
"TRF" Member
 
HERITAGE82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,439
Give a few of the more seasoned collectors a chance to comment, but I think it looks great (I do not know the MK variations well). If you polish the crystal it will look a lot better and I LOVE the faded insert!
__________________
- Rolex Explorer - 214270
- Tudor Black Bay - 79230B
- Tudor Chronograph - 79270P
- Breitling Chronomat - 10th Anniv.
- Huguenin Freres Speedmaster Prototype
HERITAGE82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2016, 12:27 AM   #13
springer
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
The dial is a Mark I, which is considered the first variation of the white-lettered dials. The bracelet and insert appear correct for the watch. There should be a date or Alpha code on the bracelet clasp. "A" would be 76, VB-1977, VC-1978, VD-1979.

For the purist, price is driven by condition and the watch's original components. You'll need to spend some time researching sales to determine if you are comfortable at that price range.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2016, 12:41 AM   #14
J!m
"TRF" Member
 
J!m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Jim
Location: Connecticut
Watch: this! Hold my beer
Posts: 2,839
Springer hit the nail on the head, as usual!

Seems very original other than the crown from what I can see. Bracelet may be a later 9315 which would need to be checked by the code Springer mentioned. If original, please send to Mike Young for restoration because it appears to be in good shape but needs TLC.

First few of the serial would help a lot too.

Dial is a Mk I white. Somewhat rare from my experience finding one recently...
J!m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2016, 12:41 AM   #15
avilhena
"TRF" Member
 
avilhena's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Brazil
Posts: 1,139
There seems to be some corrosion around the cristal. other than that, given that the scratches are on the plexi, the watch looks good. However, I think 7k is a bit too much. I think this is a 6k watch
__________________
Once you wear the crown, you can never go down.
avilhena is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2016, 12:58 AM   #16
swish77
2024 Pledge Member
 
swish77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 7,003
Quote:
Originally Posted by avilhena View Post
There seems to be some corrosion around the cristal. other than that, given that the scratches are on the plexi, the watch looks good. However, I think 7k is a bit too much. I think this is a 6k watch
Not sure that's corrosion. Could just be that brown dirt that accumulates there and is fairly common. Easy to remove. I'd say this looks like an honest 1680 with a nice dial and bezel insert at a fair price. (The days of the nice white 1680s at $6K are gone, IMHO). Check the service history, because that ain't cheap, of course, if you need to deal with that. Not sure if it's just a reflection or scratches on the plexi, but check if the tritium is in tact on all the hour markers. Looks as if some might be missing.


Case has definitely been polished some, which is no big deal as long as it's done well. (An unpolished 1680 would be a lot more than $7K.) Check the lugs on the crown side of the case. They could be a little thinner than the other side, but tough to tell in the photos. The pin seems to be sticking out a little on the lower right lug, but that could be the pin size and doesn't always mean the lug is too thin. Good luck!
swish77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2016, 01:56 AM   #17
R.W.T.
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 2,004
Done well is subjective...those spring bar holes are flared REALLY bad.

My pet peeve. Polish all you want but don't flare the springbar holes...
R.W.T. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2016, 01:57 AM   #18
J!m
"TRF" Member
 
J!m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Jim
Location: Connecticut
Watch: this! Hold my beer
Posts: 2,839
Quote:
Originally Posted by avilhena View Post
There seems to be some corrosion around the cristal. other than that, given that the scratches are on the plexi, the watch looks good. However, I think 7k is a bit too much. I think this is a 6k watch
Head only I would agree.

If that is the original bracelet, it easily adds to the value. Just being a 9315 adds a grand based on the recent sales prices. Correct date 9315 is a premium. End links are correct so quite possibly all-original.

Insert and crystal look original, which means to me it is an honest example. Possibly polished but so what? If all parts check out, and you can get it for anything under seven grand you are doing well in my opinion.

Gunk around crystal is normal. I though I had some corrosion on my 9411 and a bit of alcohol and time and it turned out to be a pristine, corrosion-free case. If there is no crevice corrosion on the back of the case, chances are it's really nice, if not perfect.

maybe $800 for service (if needed) and a few hundred to have the bracelet restored. Crown is optional but I'd certainly be changing it to the correct 702.
J!m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2016, 02:07 AM   #19
HogwldFLTR
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,698
No wristwatches from 1680 that I know of.
__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 9 (0 members and 9 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.