ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
5 June 2016, 06:55 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Jamie
Location: Edmonton, AB
Watch: This & That
Posts: 771
|
What sort of advice are you looking for?
__________________
/. |
5 June 2016, 01:45 PM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 3,578
|
I'm NOT an expert but from the pics it looks good ...
|
5 June 2016, 01:55 PM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,391
|
Overall, looks like a very nice example. Only thing I'd mention is that the pushers are service versions. Not a deal beaker by any means, but figure a period correct pair (MK2/P301's) will run you $2,000.
|
5 June 2016, 06:02 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: London
Posts: 114
|
If it's a 1980s watch, which the papers imply, then the pushers could be original. Service and original were the same by then.
Ian |
5 June 2016, 10:32 PM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Fabio
Location: Como - Italy
Posts: 4,811
|
|
6 June 2016, 02:07 AM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,391
|
You are correct, 80's 6263/5's did leave the factory equipped service style pushers. However, the certificate for this watch states that the serial is 6.2mil, meaning that this particular 6265 would have most likely left the factory with MK2 pushers.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.