ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Terry Newton · 22 July 2008, 09:19 AM

This issue has brought up a lot of controversy lately and there is a lot of passion behind the opinions of the validity of these watches. Here is a reviewer that has posted an article on E-Bay about the very topic for your perusal. It should stimulate some lively discussion.

http://reviews.ebay.com/California-D...00000000821781

I have reported many of these watches in the last week or so. I am passionate about removing fakes from E-bay as I detest seeing my fellow person being ripped off.

Terry Newton

tudorman8276 · 22 July 2008, 10:43 AM

....about the eBay review.

Stan.

stevemulholland3 · 22 July 2008, 10:49 AM

we are not good enough to hear your opinion??

tudorman8276 · 22 July 2008, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevemulholland3

we are not good enough to hear your opinion??

:c lap:

:j oy:

springer · 22 July 2008, 12:21 PM

Terry, I believe that is the same link I alluded to a few months ago. If not, it's close to what the other poser (a seller of something that purports to be something it isn't) had posted on the bay. It is a bunch of hype by someone trying to convince others about something that never was and never will be. I laughed at the statement he made about a Tudor being considered just another Rolex model like a Datejust.

A Tudor is not a Rolex, no matter what anybody places on ebay or any other website. The Rolex dials are trademark infringement and fraud.

The problem is the consumers who buy the watches from guys like this poser buy into his and others scam and usually find out too late that all they really have is a Tudor with a fake dial.

To me, it is apparant that Rolex really doesn't get too excited about this abuse, as I don't believe they have really done anything to stop it.

There really isn't a controversy here, just posers hyping Tudors as Rolexes to make a quick buck. There are many gullible people out there.

Terry Newton · 22 July 2008, 01:00 PM

John:

That is my impression as well. I think a fake in fake's clothing is still a fake. WOW! Was that profound or what.

I think they need to be reported for what they are; a watch that is neither a Rolex nor a Tudor. It should be a Rouder!

Any other opinions before we close the chapter on these watches and continue to get them banned forever more?

Terry Newton

tudorman8276 · 22 July 2008, 01:04 PM

...."round on the way"....!!

Stan.

springer · 22 July 2008, 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Terry Newton

John:

That is my impression as well. I think a fake in fake's clothing is still a fake. WOW! Was that profound or what.

I think they need to be reported for what they are; a watch that is neither a Rolex nor a Tudor. It should be a Rouder!

Any other opinions before we close the chapter on these watches and continue to get them banned forever more?

Terry Newton

That was good. made me laugh..a rouder

Orchi · 22 July 2008, 01:54 PM

Err buddy Terry...thanks for bringing this up...

As far as Orchi is concerned...neither ROLEX nor TUDOR ever made such freaking
watches to begin with...NEVER did n NEVER will be..

Irrespective of whatever any of the Sellers or any of the so called 'acclaimed reviewers' wanna claim such watches to be in eBay or elsewhere...those freaking watches would still be...FAKES...imitations n counterfeits...or 'Frankens' or miss-matched...n absolute loads of obnoxious garbage...!

stevemulholland3 · 22 July 2008, 07:45 PM

alright then,we are of one mind on the subject.

22 July 2008, 09:19 AM	#1
Terry Newton "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Terry Newton Location: Michigan Watch: Rolex TT GMT II c Posts: 6,644	California Rolex/Tudor Watches This issue has brought up a lot of controversy lately and there is a lot of passion behind the opinions of the validity of these watches. Here is a reviewer that has posted an article on E-Bay about the very topic for your perusal. It should stimulate some lively discussion. http://reviews.ebay.com/California-D...00000000821781 I have reported many of these watches in the last week or so. I am passionate about removing fakes from E-bay as I detest seeing my fellow person being ripped off. Terry Newton __________________ Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth "Z" SS Date Submariner "Z" TT GMT-Master IIc

22 July 2008, 10:43 AM	#2
tudorman8276 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: STAN Location: KY-USA Watch: Rolex Prez Posts: 12,583	Terry...I PM'd you .... ....about the eBay review. Stan.

22 July 2008, 12:21 PM	#5
springer 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: jP Location: Texas Watch: GMT-MASTER Posts: 17,319	Terry, I believe that is the same link I alluded to a few months ago. If not, it's close to what the other poser (a seller of something that purports to be something it isn't) had posted on the bay. It is a bunch of hype by someone trying to convince others about something that never was and never will be. I laughed at the statement he made about a Tudor being considered just another Rolex model like a Datejust. A Tudor is not a Rolex, no matter what anybody places on ebay or any other website. The Rolex dials are trademark infringement and fraud. The problem is the consumers who buy the watches from guys like this poser buy into his and others scam and usually find out too late that all they really have is a Tudor with a fake dial. To me, it is apparant that Rolex really doesn't get too excited about this abuse, as I don't believe they have really done anything to stop it. There really isn't a controversy here, just posers hyping Tudors as Rolexes to make a quick buck. There are many gullible people out there. __________________ Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.

22 July 2008, 01:00 PM	#6
Terry Newton "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Terry Newton Location: Michigan Watch: Rolex TT GMT II c Posts: 6,644	John: That is my impression as well. I think a fake in fake's clothing is still a fake. WOW! Was that profound or what. I think they need to be reported for what they are; a watch that is neither a Rolex nor a Tudor. It should be a Rouder! Any other opinions before we close the chapter on these watches and continue to get them banned forever more? Terry Newton __________________ Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth "Z" SS Date Submariner "Z" TT GMT-Master IIc

22 July 2008, 01:04 PM	#7
tudorman8276 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: STAN Location: KY-USA Watch: Rolex Prez Posts: 12,583	....let us KEEP ON BUSTING them!!!!!! ...."round on the way"....!! Stan.

22 July 2008, 10:49 AM	#3
stevemulholland3 Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: steven Location: tampa bay Watch: 1680 18k sub Posts: 6,672	we are not good enough to hear your opinion??

22 July 2008, 01:54 PM	#9
Orchi Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Malaysia Posts: 2,934	Err buddy Terry...thanks for bringing this up... As far as Orchi is concerned...neither ROLEX nor TUDOR ever made such freaking watches to begin with...NEVER did n NEVER will be.. Irrespective of whatever any of the Sellers or any of the so called 'acclaimed reviewers' wanna claim such watches to be in eBay or elsewhere...those freaking watches would still be...FAKES...imitations n counterfeits...or 'Frankens' or miss-matched...n absolute loads of obnoxious garbage...!

22 July 2008, 07:45 PM	#10
stevemulholland3 Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: steven Location: tampa bay Watch: 1680 18k sub Posts: 6,672	alright then,we are of one mind on the subject.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)