ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
6 August 2016, 06:18 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Batman
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 1,184
|
Sub c (no date) for less weight and being one of the most iconic watches. You can always get the SD later except if you need to dive 1220 m today.
|
6 August 2016, 07:23 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Jason
Location: Aussie/Malaysia
Watch: too many to list
Posts: 1,470
|
I've had a 114060 and have a 116610 and 116613lb and as far as comfortable watches they are lovely... However I have a 16600 and love it! It get far more wrist time then with of my ceramic subs and I always feel like I'm wearing a "Rolex" when I've got it on. The ceramic subs just don't have that feel(hard to explain)
Don't get me wrong the new maxi case is the perfect size for my wrist and is comfortable and ticks every box but they don't have the soul of my 16600 Just my 2 cents... And at the current exchange rate I'll owe you money lol!
__________________
Current lineup -116610LV Sub -16233 Tapestry Datejust -16610LV KERMIT -116600 SD4000....16612 Yachtmaster- 16710 PEPSI -216570(polar)- -Yachtmaster II 116688 126300 Datejust 41 jubilee * Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons *
|
6 August 2016, 07:25 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: -
Posts: 290
|
I like the Sub.
|
6 August 2016, 08:15 PM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Real Name: Jansky
Location: Midwest
Watch: this! Hold my beer
Posts: 610
|
|
6 August 2016, 11:06 PM | #35 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,489
|
114060. Classic Sub design and slim profile make it the one for me.
|
6 August 2016, 11:59 PM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
|
The 114060 weighs slightly more than the 16660, although the weight of the 114060 is probably better proportioned. I'd probably call a pre-ceramic SD more icnonic than a ceramic Sub, to be honest.
|
7 August 2016, 12:03 AM | #37 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Justin
Location: FL
Watch: PO/EXPL
Posts: 3,371
|
Quote:
|
|
7 August 2016, 12:04 AM | #38 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
|
I faced this choice and went for the sd. The only correct answer is "get both eventually".
|
7 August 2016, 12:25 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 7,024
|
|
7 August 2016, 12:28 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 7,024
|
|
7 August 2016, 01:01 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 13
|
Again , Thanks gents for the input!
I stopped by Tourneau and no luck with finding a nice SD 5 digit I dos however re try on the ceramics .... So my dilemma is I want a watch that will be my companion for years to come , at least until I get my toddler girls into middle school :) Maybe then I can add another high dollar watch to the collection! I get what you mean about the 5 digit having a soul feeling:) aside from the flimsy clasp /bracelet :( Dare I say the 6 digit ceramic did feel more robust , But ..... When the lady was showing it to me she made it seem as if it was a tennis bracelet , the way it " shiny" she said Hmmm dunno Maybe il get myself a Steinhart and quit my whining :) JK Lol Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
7 August 2016, 01:29 AM | #42 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Hoth
Posts: 1,243
|
Quote:
If you like the heft of the 16600, why not go for the 116600? If it boils down to the modern references of the Sub and SD, the question you have to ask yourself is: do I want a date (116600) or not (114060)? Good luck with your decision. |
|
7 August 2016, 01:50 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 13
|
I wish the SDK 4
Was in the budget ! I would buy it in a heart beat Best of both worlds right there :) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.