ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

wirelessdog · 12 August 2016, 02:47 AM

Hoping I got a great deal on eBay. Not seeing anything blatantly wrong but I'm not the expert. Pictures attached.

wirelessdog · 12 August 2016, 02:56 AM

Update. For the movement, time adjusts moving the stem backwards. At the date click it changes the date moving forward

wirelessdog · 12 August 2016, 03:02 AM

Numbers on the case clearly looked etched. Did they start doing that in later years or do I have a decent fake?

jjlawyer · 12 August 2016, 03:07 AM

Obvious counterfeit.

offrdmania · 12 August 2016, 03:49 AM

Case markings look very suspect. Opening the caseback should put your suspicions to rest

Etschell · 12 August 2016, 04:26 AM

its a fake.

Al1969 · 12 August 2016, 05:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Etschell

its a fake.

That's what I was thinking. Is that even a maxi dial? Seems a lot of these LV threads "real or fake" popping up lately.

teqp · 12 August 2016, 05:08 AM

Hope you did not pay too much for that.

Al1969 · 12 August 2016, 05:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by teqp

Hope you did not pay too much for that.

He said he got a "great deal"

Rolex addict · 12 August 2016, 05:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Al1969

He said he got a "great deal"

It's not that great a deal if you get scammed.

I have never seen a bracelet reference number stamped on a link. That goes for ANY Rolex.

crowncollection · 12 August 2016, 05:38 AM

Clearly fake

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

southtexas · 12 August 2016, 05:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rolex addict

It's not that great a deal if you get scammed.

I have never seen a bracelet reference number stamped on a link. That goes for ANY Rolex.

Actually lots of the models are stamped on the last link, starting back in the 50's, I believe.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

wirelessdog · 12 August 2016, 06:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Al1969

He said he got a "great deal"

Great deal if it was real. Not so much since its a fake. No, I didn't spend $50 on it :-p $3500

Rolex addict · 12 August 2016, 06:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by southtexas

Actually lots of the models are stamped on the last link, starting back in the 50's, I believe.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Between my brother and I, we have had over 14 Rolexes dating from early 2000's to now. One of those, which I still have, is a D serial 16610LV. Nothing I have ever owned or looked at has been stamped on the link like that. I would love to see examples of real Rolexes that do. Not saying they don't exist, just that I've never seen one in person. Even the 1967 5513 Sub at my local AD isn't stamped on the bracelet. I'm sure there are plenty of people here with vintage that could offer a picture.

teqp · 12 August 2016, 06:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wirelessdog

Great deal if it was real. Not so much since its a fake. No, I didn't spend $50 on it :-p $3500

I hope you are able to get your money back.

MonBK · 12 August 2016, 06:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wirelessdog

Great deal if it was real. Not so much since its a fake. No, I didn't spend $50 on it :-p $3500

That should have tipped you off.

offrdmania · 12 August 2016, 06:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rolex addict

Between my brother and I, we have had over 14 Rolexes dating from early 2000's to now. One of those, which I still have, is a D serial 16610LV. Nothing I have ever owned or looked at has been stamped on the link like that. I would love to see examples of real Rolexes that do. Not saying they don't exist, just that I've never seen one in person. Even the 1967 5513 Sub at my local AD isn't stamped on the bracelet. I'm sure there are plenty of people here with vintage that could offer a picture.

Here is my 7205 from 1969

And my 78350 from 1979

Al1969 · 12 August 2016, 07:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wirelessdog

Great deal if it was real. Not so much since its a fake. No, I didn't spend $50 on it :-p $3500

Wow. Yeah that should definitely tip you off. I think even a "beat up" LV would command more than that.

Rolex addict · 12 August 2016, 07:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by offrdmania

Here is my 7205 from 1969

And my 78350 from 1979

Thank you!!

Never seen that before.

southtexas · 12 August 2016, 07:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rolex addict

Between my brother and I, we have had over 14 Rolexes dating from early 2000's to now. One of those, which I still have, is a D serial 16610LV. Nothing I have ever owned or looked at has been stamped on the link like that. I would love to see examples of real Rolexes that do. Not saying they don't exist, just that I've never seen one in person. Even the 1967 5513 Sub at my local AD isn't stamped on the bracelet. I'm sure there are plenty of people here with vintage that could offer a picture.

Here are samples of 3 eras' worth of bracelets...rivet, folded, solid oyster.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Rolex addict · 12 August 2016, 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by southtexas

Here are samples of 3 eras' worth of bracelets...rivet, folded, solid oyster.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thank you.

jjlawyer · 13 August 2016, 02:04 AM

BTW OP, google the sn of your watch F437091. That should help you get your refund.

cab56 · 13 August 2016, 02:50 AM

Well known replica SN. Just google "Rolex F437091"

12 August 2016, 02:47 AM	#1
wirelessdog "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Real Name: John Location: Maryland, USA Watch: Black face Sub Posts: 34	16610T Real or fake Hoping I got a great deal on eBay. Not seeing anything blatantly wrong but I'm not the expert. Pictures attached. Attached Images

12 August 2016, 03:49 AM	#5
offrdmania 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2008 Real Name: Matt Location: Wine Country, Ca Posts: 5,998	Case markings look very suspect. Opening the caseback should put your suspicions to rest __________________ TRF Member 11738

12 August 2016, 04:26 AM	#6
Etschell "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Location: FL Watch: platinum sub Posts: 15,884	its a fake. __________________ If you wind it, they will run. 25 or 6 to 4.

12 August 2016, 05:38 AM	#11
crowncollection "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: David Location: australia Posts: 20,216	Clearly fake Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ watches many

12 August 2016, 02:56 AM	#2
wirelessdog "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Real Name: John Location: Maryland, USA Watch: Black face Sub Posts: 34	Update. For the movement, time adjusts moving the stem backwards. At the date click it changes the date moving forward

12 August 2016, 03:02 AM	#3
wirelessdog "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Real Name: John Location: Maryland, USA Watch: Black face Sub Posts: 34	Numbers on the case clearly looked etched. Did they start doing that in later years or do I have a decent fake?

12 August 2016, 03:07 AM	#4
jjlawyer "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: LA Posts: 10	Obvious counterfeit.

12 August 2016, 05:08 AM	#8
teqp "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Real Name: Phil Location: SoCal Watch: 116613LN Posts: 3,052	Hope you did not pay too much for that.

13 August 2016, 02:04 AM	#22
jjlawyer "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: LA Posts: 10	BTW OP, google the sn of your watch F437091. That should help you get your refund.

13 August 2016, 02:50 AM	#23
cab56 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2015 Real Name: Chris Location: Canada Watch: many! Posts: 1,134	Well known replica SN. Just google "Rolex F437091"

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)