ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

stevemulholland3 · 2 August 2008, 10:25 PM

look a little small?opinions..
http://cgi.ebay.com/RARE-VINTAGE-ROL...6.c0.m14.l1318

Spark · 2 August 2008, 10:39 PM

Yes it does look a bit small, but that can sometimes happen depending on the camera angle.
It could also be a replacement aftermarket crystal.
The dial, hands and bezel/pearl look ok for the vintage.
The case sides look a little shallow, which is probably a camera issue too.
It is very hard to see when the pics are not supersize.

frostie · 2 August 2008, 11:05 PM

It looks fishy to me

tudorman8276 · 3 August 2008, 01:31 AM

....crystal. Looks like a straight down camera shot.

Stan.

SUPERDOC · 3 August 2008, 02:54 AM

the case looks ok...the mag doesn' bother me that much...but the cyclops does look a bit crooked in the first shot...almost seems like there is more than one watch being photoghraphed...

May be all camera angle...or maybe, Steve, you've just made us all paranoid...

stevemulholland3 · 3 August 2008, 03:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SUPERDOC

the case looks ok...the mag doesn' bother me that much...but the cyclops does look a bit crooked in the first shot...almost seems like there is more than one watch being photoghraphed...

May be all camera angle...or maybe, Steve, you've just made us all paranoid...

you know what they say,your not paranoid if they really are after you!
trust me these con artists are after your money,so you have to be paranoid about every watch you dont buy from an AD!
p.s.-if I was a scammer I would take it to a place like youbid(its an ebay drop off center)that way the seller has plenty of feedback and they(youbid) cannot check everything out that gets dropped off.

ROGERB · 3 August 2008, 04:53 AM

I don't think Steven the cyclops issue is camera angle, should fill the area more vertically when magnified, and "aftermarket crystal" would make me real nervous w/o more info...R

2 August 2008, 10:25 PM	#1
stevemulholland3 Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: steven Location: tampa bay Watch: 1680 18k sub Posts: 6,672	does the magnification on this watch.. look a little small?opinions.. http://cgi.ebay.com/RARE-VINTAGE-ROL...6.c0.m14.l1318

2 August 2008, 11:05 PM	#3
frostie 1,000,000th PostMember Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Earth Posts: 14,048	It looks fishy to me __________________ GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN

3 August 2008, 01:31 AM	#4
tudorman8276 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: STAN Location: KY-USA Watch: Rolex Prez Posts: 12,583	MM VOTE....aftermarket... ....crystal. Looks like a straight down camera shot. Stan.

2 August 2008, 10:39 PM	#2
Spark "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Real Name: Mark Location: U.K. Watch: Too Many Posts: 2,097	Yes it does look a bit small, but that can sometimes happen depending on the camera angle. It could also be a replacement aftermarket crystal. The dial, hands and bezel/pearl look ok for the vintage. The case sides look a little shallow, which is probably a camera issue too. It is very hard to see when the pics are not supersize.

3 August 2008, 02:54 AM	#5
SUPERDOC "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: R.J. Location: Canada Posts: 1,546	the case looks ok...the mag doesn' bother me that much...but the cyclops does look a bit crooked in the first shot...almost seems like there is more than one watch being photoghraphed... May be all camera angle...or maybe, Steve, you've just made us all paranoid...

3 August 2008, 04:53 AM	#7
ROGERB "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Roger Location: WHITE ROCK BC Watch: 89 16610, 57 7914, Posts: 897	I don't think Steven the cyclops issue is camera angle, should fill the area more vertically when magnified, and "aftermarket crystal" would make me real nervous w/o more info...R

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)