ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

fskywalker · 31 August 2016, 07:41 PM

Looks good!

jay_kay · 31 August 2016, 07:47 PM

I'm loving the non cyclops crystal! Thats pretty much the only reason why my 16610LV got sold, I may track an LV down now and get rid of my DSSD! Thanks for the pics.

Also just curious as to why you have the 16610LV in a 93150 strap on the first pic? I think I prefer the look of the end links to the SEL's, how did you get round the 501b end links and allowing you to remove the strap again?

OmegaJJH · 1 September 2016, 12:05 AM

Well you learn something new every day.

Looks good - glad you got it sorted and exactly how you wanted. (For a pretty fair price too).

Mr. K · 1 September 2016, 01:00 AM

Glad you like it. It is a highly sought-after watch. I'm wondering if the modification will hurt the value? But if you never sell it it doesn't matter enjoy.

DawgByte · 1 September 2016, 01:13 AM

I'm a purest and prefer the cyclops, but I think your watch looks terrific without it and I really like the green bezel. Very nice watch, well done sir!

kaiserphoenix · 1 September 2016, 01:49 AM

Wow didnt know Rolex would accept that, this now looks like a Seadweller with a green bezel!! I much prefer it without the cyclops, thanks for sharing!

actionkwj · 1 September 2016, 02:13 AM

Watch looks great but the real story is RSC agreeing to your request!

The Rolex Cowboy

Jemspeed · 1 September 2016, 02:22 AM

This raises some questions aside from Rolex fulfilling the request, which I don't think is all that incredible. (1) why does the card say service 20 march 2013 and the jeweler invoice say 1 May 2013 and (2) why hasn't it been worn? It is neither rare nor special.

solaz1962 · 2 September 2016, 12:40 AM

I Like the new look...

Orangejoe · 2 September 2016, 01:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SC11

Am I missing something or was this done back in 2013 by the looks of the service date?

If so don't think it's relevant now.

It's relevant if he just wanted to share... or is looking for offers. You know how Rolex collectors go crazy for watches with a good story.

The Libertine · 2 September 2016, 01:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by badass09

i didn't know rolex would accept that request.. but anyhow.. the sub looks great..

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

+1 - very surprised to see this, but your Submariner looks good.

badass09 · 2 September 2016, 04:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Libertine

+1 - very surprised to see this, but your Submariner looks good.

thanks buddy..

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Grey.Coupe · 2 September 2016, 04:47 AM

Cheers to Rolex, creating satisfied customers.

Splash · 2 September 2016, 05:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by watchwatcher

Love it. The green is such a nice shade. But...are you telling us you haven't worn this beauty in 3 years? Wow...

Yeah- That's just sad.

milwatch126 · 2 September 2016, 06:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jemspeed

This raises some questions aside from Rolex fulfilling the request, which I don't think is all that incredible. (1) why does the card say service 20 march 2013 and the jeweler invoice say 1 May 2013 and (2) why hasn't it been worn? It is neither rare nor special.

Rolex U.K. Service time? No need to wear it and it's not for sale. Who said it was rare but it's special to me my lad

This is a Rolex forum and those who know Rolex service centres (you may not?)
Know that requests are not fulfilled usually.

M

31 August 2016, 07:41 PM	#31
fskywalker 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2014 Real Name: Francisco Location: San Juan, PR Watch: Is Ticking ! Posts: 25,179	Looks good! __________________ Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001 Zenith 02.480.405 2FA security enabled

31 August 2016, 07:47 PM	#32
jay_kay "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Barrowford Watch: Tudor Black Bay 54 Posts: 1,699	I'm loving the non cyclops crystal! Thats pretty much the only reason why my 16610LV got sold, I may track an LV down now and get rid of my DSSD! Thanks for the pics. Also just curious as to why you have the 16610LV in a 93150 strap on the first pic? I think I prefer the look of the end links to the SEL's, how did you get round the 501b end links and allowing you to remove the strap again? __________________ Rolex Explorer 214270, Omega Speedmaster '1957 Relaunch' 3594.50.00, Panerai Luminor 1950 PAM00127-E, Panerai Radiomir 1936 PAM00249-I, Panerai Mare Nostrum PAM00716-T, Panerai PAM00785-Q Set, Panerai Luminor Black Seal PAM00594-Q, Panerai Luminor Daylight PAM00604-Q, Tudor Black Bay 54 79000N, Heuer Carrera Re-Edition CS3113, Hamilton Military W10 & TAG Heuer F1

1 September 2016, 01:49 AM	#36
kaiserphoenix "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: London/Tokyo Watch: FPJ CO BL Posts: 1,709	Wow didnt know Rolex would accept that, this now looks like a Seadweller with a green bezel!! I much prefer it without the cyclops, thanks for sharing! __________________ F.P.Journe Chronometre Optimum Black Label, Patek 5811G-001, Patek 5968A-001, Patek 5167A-001 IG: tokyo_watch_guy

1 September 2016, 12:05 AM	#33
OmegaJJH "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2013 Real Name: James Location: UK Watch: Rolex & Omega Posts: 6,668	Well you learn something new every day. Looks good - glad you got it sorted and exactly how you wanted. (For a pretty fair price too).

1 September 2016, 01:00 AM	#34
Mr. K "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Mark Location: Seattle-ish Posts: 6,078	Glad you like it. It is a highly sought-after watch. I'm wondering if the modification will hurt the value? But if you never sell it it doesn't matter enjoy.

1 September 2016, 01:13 AM	#35
DawgByte "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2016 Location: Atlanta Watch: Rolex GMT IIc Posts: 163	I'm a purest and prefer the cyclops, but I think your watch looks terrific without it and I really like the green bezel. Very nice watch, well done sir!

1 September 2016, 02:13 AM	#37
actionkwj "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: san diego Watch: me soak up the sun Posts: 1,245	Watch looks great but the real story is RSC agreeing to your request! The Rolex Cowboy

1 September 2016, 02:22 AM	#38
Jemspeed "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: Washington, DC Posts: 199	This raises some questions aside from Rolex fulfilling the request, which I don't think is all that incredible. (1) why does the card say service 20 march 2013 and the jeweler invoice say 1 May 2013 and (2) why hasn't it been worn? It is neither rare nor special.

2 September 2016, 12:40 AM	#39
solaz1962 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2016 Real Name: Scott Location: New Jersey USA Watch: Sub 116610 Posts: 26	I Like the new look...

2 September 2016, 04:47 AM	#43
Grey.Coupe "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: NC, USA Posts: 555	Cheers to Rolex, creating satisfied customers.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)