ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

greekbum · 24 September 2016, 01:30 PM

Tudor....investment....imho for me only as a much cheaper alternative to the Rolex version. It was always known as the poor mans Rolex as far back as i can remember. If I could choose over the Rolex equivalent I would always go Rolex for myself. The only appeal i ever have with them is if they are 1/2 price or less than the Rolex equivalent. Parts are very hard to source and they have always been a headache for me. This is just my opinion and I know there are collectors and people who love them but the prices of these has gone way high for what they are imho. I've owned 100s and i like the older subs the best.

24 September 2016, 01:30 PM	#25
greekbum "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Real Name: Nikos Location: Florida Watch: Rolex GMT 16750 Posts: 8,418	Tudor....investment....imho for me only as a much cheaper alternative to the Rolex version. It was always known as the poor mans Rolex as far back as i can remember. If I could choose over the Rolex equivalent I would always go Rolex for myself. The only appeal i ever have with them is if they are 1/2 price or less than the Rolex equivalent. Parts are very hard to source and they have always been a headache for me. This is just my opinion and I know there are collectors and people who love them but the prices of these has gone way high for what they are imho. I've owned 100s and i like the older subs the best. __________________ Follow Me On Instagram @nickgogas Original Owner ROLEX 16750 GMT Daily Wearer For Over 13,000 Days And Counting

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)