ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
10 February 2017, 12:43 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Shaun
Location: Devonshire
Watch: SubND/D/LV
Posts: 651
|
Sub 16800 dial question..
Hi forum members, I've just picked up a 1985 (865xxxx serial) Sub 16800 today..Just checking it out and I have a dial query...This one has the gold appliques hour markers which have a gorgeous cream patina, but the dial is matte...Is this possible or should it be gloss? I'm feeling slightly nervous, but case looks largely in original shape with sharp edges, the bracelet is correct and clasp has "I10" code good for a Sub of this age..I'm hoping its correct and original..
Please help! |
10 February 2017, 06:53 AM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Richard
Location: GA
Watch: YTBD
Posts: 23,509
|
I'm not an expert...I believe it should be glossy, but these dials had a tendency to matte over time.
|
10 February 2017, 06:56 AM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 1,125
|
Nice thick case and correct date wheel!
My old Sub 16800 has a matte dial with 7.299 serial number.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
10 February 2017, 07:09 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Real Name: Mike
Location: Philadelphia
Watch: 1016
Posts: 88
|
Don't the WG surrounds indicate it was originally a glossy dial?
|
10 February 2017, 07:16 AM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Richard
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,858
|
Yes, you do have a "gloss" dial as defined by the white gold circles surrounding the lume plots. The original gloss finish has simply faded over the years. A true matte dial has the lume material applied directly to the dial without any trim. For the reference 16800, the switch from matte to gloss dials was right around 8.5 or 8.6 million so everything checks out.
|
10 February 2017, 08:01 AM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Justin S.
Location: Southeastern U.S.
Watch: 5513 Sub
Posts: 790
|
Its a "gloss gone matte" as some like to call it...
Nice watch btw.
Enjoy JS |
10 February 2017, 08:14 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Shaun
Location: Devonshire
Watch: SubND/D/LV
Posts: 651
|
Thanks for your answers guys, I'm still not convinced its a "gloss gone matte" dial..The dial is textured as in the true matte dial variant..Check out very similar watch to mine here; http://www.watchcollectinglifestyle....he-wrist-since
|
11 February 2017, 01:59 AM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Real Name: Mike
Location: Philadelphia
Watch: 1016
Posts: 88
|
Quote:
I was considering a 16800 and ran into this as well. There are reports of later serial 16800s that are fitted with true matte dials, but many also question whether they are original or period correct service dials. As far as I know there was never a true matte dial with WG surrounds. |
|
11 February 2017, 05:35 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Zach
Location: denver
Watch: Sub. 16800
Posts: 52
|
That looks just like the service dial Rolex put in my 16800 about 5 years ago. I believe they stopped putting the Matte dials like U5512's above around 8.3 mil.
|
11 February 2017, 05:37 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Zach
Location: denver
Watch: Sub. 16800
Posts: 52
|
I'm still on the hunt to get my 16800 back to Matte dial and hands.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.